Skip to main content
Log in

Using risk assessments to address corruption in mining

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transparent and accountable mining can contribute to sustainable development. This begins with corruption-free approvals—the very first link in the mining value chain when decisions are made about whether, where, and under what circumstances to permit mining, including who is awarded licences or contracts. This viewpoint introduces the Mining Awards Corruption Risk Assessment Tool developed by the global civil society anti-corruption coalition, Transparency International. Corruption in mining approvals can result in environmentally unsound and socially destructive mining projects being approved, rights to a country’s mineral wealth being granted to unqualified or unethical operators, and politicians or government officials taking advantage of their position to profit from their interests in the sector. Corruption at the start of the mine lifecycle compromises the rest of the process—impairing how operations are monitored and regulated, undermining the collection of taxes and royalties and damaging the mining industry’s social licence to operate. Identifying, assessing and then managing the risks of corruption are integral to effective anti-corruption strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caripis L (2017) Combatting corruption in mining approvals: assessing the risks in 18 resource-rich countries. Transparency International/Transparency International Australia, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nest M (2017) Mining Awards Corruption Risk Assessment Tool, 2nd edn. Transparency International/Transparency International Australia, Berlin

Download references

Acknowledgments

This programme is led by Transparency International Australia, put into practice by Transparency International national chapters and local stakeholders, and supported by the Transparency International Secretariat.

Funding

This programme is funded by the BHP Billiton Foundation and the Australian Government through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Caripis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caripis, L., Shaw, A. & Skok, A. Using risk assessments to address corruption in mining. Miner Econ 32, 251–253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-018-0157-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-018-0157-8

Keywords

Navigation