Skip to main content
Log in

Transcriptome analysis reveals salinity responses in four Tartary buckwheat cultivars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) is widely planted in the world because of its high nutritional content and strong salt tolerance. However, high salinity still causes some declines in the crop production. In addition, it is unclear of molecular mechanism imparting salt tolerance on this crop. In order to obtain more detailed information regarding this mechanism, we made transcriptome comparisons between short-term acclimation to salt stress (100 mM of NaCl, 48 h) and control in two existing and two new salt-tolerant cultivars of Tartary buckwheat in this study. In total, 205.2 million clean reads were produced through an illumina sequencing approach. A total of 10,865 unigenes were annotated against all four public databases: Nr, Swiss-Prot, KOG and KEGG. 42 common unigenes in all the four cultivars expressed differentially after 100 mM of NaCl for 48 h, suggesting that these differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) may be involved in salinity response. In addition, we identified 57 transcription factor families total in this study, whereas eight of 42 DEGs can encode this protein. We also observed certain unigenes were ROS (reactive oxygen species) related, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), which were chosen for validation by quantitative real-time PCR. Taken together, the transcriptome data obtained from distinct cultivars of F. tataricum with different salt tolerance was the first report, which provides a valuable insight into the mechanisms of salt tolerance and offers promising references for cultivating strong salt-tolerant Tartary buckwheat cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw reads have been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession ID SRP125065: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP125065.

Abbreviations

CDS:

Coding sequence

DEG:

Differentially expressed gene

FDR:

False discovery rate

GO:

Gene ontology

MAPK:

Mitogen activated protein kinase

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SOS:

Salt overly sensitive

SR:

Salt-related

SRA:

Sequence read archive

TF:

Transcription factor

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371552), and acknowledge Dr. Mark Ziemann of Deakin University in Australia for language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J-NS analyzed the relative expression level of genes and drafted the manuscript. X-HL analyzed the transcriptome data of Tartary buckwheat. Y-QW cultivated the plant and treated. H-BY designed the study and helped draft the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Bing Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict exists among all the authors, and the contribution of the authors is clear and unquestionable. All of them declare that they have no conflict of interest. Therefore, all authors are allowed to publish the article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, JN., Liu, XH., Wang, YQ. et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals salinity responses in four Tartary buckwheat cultivars. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 30, 564–578 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-021-00648-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-021-00648-2

Keywords

Navigation