Skip to main content
Log in

Surface morphology characterization of laser-induced titanium implants: lesson to enhance osseointegration process

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface properties of implant are responsible to provide mechanical stability by creating an intimate bond between the bone and implant; hence, play a major role on osseointegration process. The current study was aimed to measure surface characteristics of titanium modified by a pulsed Nd:YAG laser. The results of this study revealed an optimum density of laser energy (140 Jcm−2), at which improvement of osteointegration process was seen. Significant differences were found between arithmetical mean height (Ra), root mean square deviation (Rq) and texture orientation, all were lower for 140 Jcm−2 samples compared to untreated one. Also it was identified that the surface segments were more uniformly distributed with a more Gaussian distribution for treated samples at 140 Jcm−2. The distribution of texture orientation at high laser density (250 and 300 Jcm−2) were approximately similar to untreated sample. The skewness index that indicates how peaks and valleys are distributed throughout the surface showed a positive value for laser treated samples, compared to untreated one. The surface characterization revealed that Kurtosis index, which tells us how high or flat the surface profile is, for treated sample at 140 Jcm−2 was marginally close to 3 indicating flat peaks and valleys in the surface profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interface. Biomaterials. 1999;20(23):2311–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu X, Zhang Y, Li S, Wang Y, Sun T, Li Z, et al. Study of a new bone-targeting titanium implant–bone interface. Int J Nanomed. 2016;11:6307–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reviakine I, Jung F, Braune S, Brash JL, Latour R, Gorbet M, et al. Stirred, shaken, or stagnant: what goes on at the blood–biomaterial interface. Blood Rev. 2017;31(1):11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang J, Zhou Y, Wei F, Xiao Y. Blood clot formed on rough titanium surface induces early cell recruitment. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2016;27(8):1031–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuss S, Schneider RK, Tietze L, Knuchel R, Jahnen-Dechent W. Secretion of fibrinolytic enzymes facilitates human mesenchymal stem cell invasion into fibrin clots. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;191(1):36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z-S, Feng Z-H, Wu G-F, Bai S-Z, Dong Y, Chen F-M, et al. The use of platelet-rich fibrin combined with periodontal ligament and jaw bone mesenchymal stem cell sheets for periodontal tissue engineering. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(5):391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davies JE. Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007;28(34):5058–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsson Wexell C, Shah FA, Ericson L, Matic A, Palmquist A, Thomsen P. Electropolished titanium implants with a mirror-like surface support osseointegration and bone remodelling. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2016;2016:1750105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ting M, Jefferies SR, Xia W, Engqvist H, Suzuki JB. Classification and effects of implant surface modification on the bone: human cell-based in vitro studies. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43(1):58–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Oirschot BA, Eman RM, Habibovic P, Leeuwenburgh SC, Tahmasebi Z, Weinans H, et al. Osteophilic properties of bone implant surface modifications in a cassette model on a decorticated goat spinal transverse process. Acta Biomater. 2016;37:195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hotchkiss KM, Reddy GB, Hyzy SL, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD, Olivares-Navarrete R. Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation. Acta Biomater. 2016;31:425–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen J, Rungsiyakull C, Li W, Chen Y, Swain M, Li Q. Multiscale design of surface morphological gradient for osseointegration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;20(Supplement C):387–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(8):3363–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khosroshahi M, Valanezhad A, Tavakoli J. Evaluation of mid-IR laser radiation effect on 316L stainless steel corrosion resistance in physiological saline. Amir Kabir. 2004;15(58-B):107–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khosroshahi M, Mahmoodi M, Tavakoli J, Tahriri M. Effect of Nd: yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser radiation on Ti6Al4V alloy properties for biomedical applications. J Laser Appl. 2008;20(4):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khosroshahi ME, Pour FA, Hadavi M, Mahmoodi M. In situ monitoring the pulse CO2 laser interaction with 316-L stainless steel using acoustical signals and plasma analysis. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256(24):7421–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartolomeu F, Sampaio M, Carvalho O, Pinto E, Alves N, Gomes JR, et al. Tribological behavior of Ti6Al4V cellular structures produced by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69(Supplement C):128–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marin E, Fusi S, Pressacco M, Paussa L, Fedrizzi L. Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: trabecular titanium. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010;3(5):373–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khosroshahi ME, Mahmoodi M, Tavakoli J. Characterization of Ti6Al4V implant surface treated by Nd:YAG laser and emery paper for orthopaedic applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253(21):8772–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tavakoli J, Khosroshahi M, Mahmoodi M. Characterization of Nd:YAG laser radiation effects on Ti6A14V physico-chemical properties: an in vivo study. Int J Eng Trans B. 2007;20(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khosroshahi ME, Tavakoli J, Mahmoodi M. Analysis of bioadhesivity of osteoblast cells on titanium alloy surface modified by Nd:YAG laser. J Adhes. 2007;83(2):151–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karazisis D, Petronis S, Agheli H, Emanuelsson L, Norlindh B, Johansson A, et al. The influence of controlled surface nanotopography on the early biological events of osseointegration. Acta Biomater. 2017;53:559–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bose S, Tarafder S, Bandyopadhyay A. Effect of chemistry on osteogenesis and angiogenesis towards bone tissue engineering using 3D printed scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(1):261–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coelho PG, Granato R, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Suzuki M, Valverde GB, et al. The effect of different implant macrogeometries and surface treatment in early biomechanical fixation: an experimental study in dogs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(8):1974–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamlet SM, Ivanovski S. Inflammatory cytokine response to titanium surface chemistry and topography. In: The immune response to implanted materials and devices. Springer; 2017. p. 151–67.

  27. Coelho PG, Gil LF, Neiva R, Jimbo R, Tovar N, Lilin T, et al. Microrobotized blasting improves the bone-to-textured implant response. A preclinical in vivo biomechanical study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;56(Supplement C):175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Su Y, Komasa S, Li P, Nishizaki M, Chen L, Terada C, et al. Synergistic effect of nanotopography and bioactive ions on peri-implant bone response. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Queiroz TP, de Molon RS, Souza FÁ, Margonar R, Thomazini AHA, Guastaldi AC, et al. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(2):685–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mangano FG, Pires JT, Shibli JA, Mijiritsky E, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, et al. Early bone response to dual acid-etched and machined dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla: a histologic and histomorphometric human study. Implant dentistry. 2017;26(1):24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Camargo WA, Takemoto S, Hoekstra JW, Leeuwenburgh SC, Jansen JA, van den Beucken JJ, et al. Effect of surface alkali-based treatment of titanium implants on ability to promote in vitro mineralization and in vivo bone formation. Acta Biomater. 2017;57:511–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wirth J, Tahriri M, Khoshroo K, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Dentino AR, Tayebi L. Surface modification of dental implants. In: Biomaterials for oral and dental tissue engineering. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 85–96.

  33. Mangano F, Mangano C, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Histological evidence of the osseointegration of fractured direct metal laser sintering implants retrieved after 5 years of function. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:9732136.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moore B, Asadi E, Lewis G. Deposition methods for microstructured and nanostructured coatings on metallic bone implants: a review. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2017;2017:5812907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Palmquist A, Shah FA, Emanuelsson L, Omar O, Suska F. A technique for evaluating bone ingrowth into 3D printed, porous Ti6Al4V implants accurately using X-ray micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry. Micron. 2017;94:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wieland M, Textor M, Spencer ND, Brunette DM. Wavelength-dependent roughness: a quantitative approach to characterizing the topography of rough titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(2):163–81.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu J, Fan X, Sun C, Zhu W. Oxidation of the titanium (0001) surface: diffusion processes of oxygen from DFT. RSC Adv. 2016;6(75):71311–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Junkar I, Kulkarni M, Drašler B, Rugelj N, Mazare A, Flašker A, et al. Influence of various sterilization procedures on TiO2 nanotubes used for biomedical devices. Bioelectrochemistry. 2016;109:79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad E. Khosroshahi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

It is declared that no human or animal has been used at any stage during this experiment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavakoli, J., Khosroshahi, M.E. Surface morphology characterization of laser-induced titanium implants: lesson to enhance osseointegration process. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 8, 249–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-018-0063-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-018-0063-6

Keywords

Navigation