Advertisement

Biomedical Engineering Letters

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 305–309 | Cite as

Sex differences of cognitive load effects on object-location binding memory

  • Jinsick Park
  • Ga In Shin
  • Young Min Park
  • In Young Kim
  • Dong Pyo Jang
Original Article
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we investigated where the sex differences of object-location binding memory performance were influenced by the cognitive load. We used the fractal objects version of the ‘What was where?’ task to measure object memory, location memory and objection-location binding memory. Cognitive load was controlled by task difficulty presented two sessions: one session randomly displayed three or four fractal objects (Session 34) and the other session four or five objects (Session 45). The results showed that females outperformed males on object-location binding memory. Interestingly, even when the four object trials were compared between Session 34 and Session 45, in which we believed that the level of difficulty was similar while cognitive load varied, the swap error of males was significantly increased in Session 45 compared to females. In conclusion, there may be sex differences in object-location binding memory and the males could be more sensitive about the cognitive load than females.

Keywords

Object-location binding memory Swap error measurement Sex differences Cognitive load 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01059743).

References

  1. 1.
    Astur RS, Ortiz ML, Sutherland RJ. A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: a large and reliable sex difference. Behav Brain Res. 1998;93(1):185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moffat SD, Hampson E, Hatzipantelis M. Navigation in a “virtual” maze: sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evol Hum Behav. 1998;19(2):73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Driscoll I, Hamilton DA, Yeo RA, Brooks WM, Sutherland RJ. Virtual navigation in humans: the impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Horm Behav. 2005;47(3):326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rahman Q, Koerting J. Sexual orientation-related differences in allocentric spatial memory tasks. Hippocampus. 2008;18(1):55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Voyer D, Postma A, Brake B, Imperato-McGinley J. Gender differences in object location memory: a meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007;14(1):23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rahman Q, Wilson GD, Abrahams S. Sexual orientation related differences in spatial memory. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9(03):376–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassan B, Rahman Q. Selective sexual orientation-related differences in object location memory. Behav Neurosci. 2007;121(3):625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silverman I, Choi J, Peters M. The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: data from 40 countries. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36(2):261–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spiers MV, Sakamoto M, Elliott RJ, Baumann S. Sex differences in spatial object-location memory in a virtual grocery store. CyberPsychol Behav. 2008;11(4):471–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dabbs JM, Chang E-L, Strong RA, Milun R. Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evol Hum Behav. 1998;19(2):89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epting LK, Overman WH. Sex-sensitive tasks in men and women: a search for performance fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. Behav Neurosci. 1998;112(6):1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janzen G, Van Turennout M. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(6):673–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Postma A, Jager G, Kessels RP, Koppeschaar HP, van Honk J. Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain Cogn. 2004;54(1):24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones CM, Healy SD. Differences in cue use and spatial memory in men and women. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;273(1598):2241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kessels RP, Nys GM, Brands AM, van den Berg E, Van Zandvoort MJ. The modified Location Learning Test: norms for the assessment of spatial memory function in neuropsychological patients. Arch clin neuropsychol. 2006;21(8):841–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Postma A, Izendoorn R, De Haan EH. Sex differences in object location memory. Brain Cogn. 1998;36(3):334–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rahman Q, Bakare M, Serinsu C. No sex differences in spatial location memory for abstract designs. Brain Cogn. 2011;76(1):15–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pertzov Y, Dong MY, Peich M-C, Husain M. Forgetting what was where: The fragility of object-location binding. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pertzov Y, Miller TD, Gorgoraptis N, Caine D, Schott JM, Butler C, et al. Binding deficits in memory following medial temporal lobe damage in patients with voltage-gated potassium channel complex antibody-associated limbic encephalitis. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 8):2474–85. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gallagher P, Neave N, Hamilton C, Gray JM. Sex differences in object location memory: some further methodological considerations. Learn Individ Differ. 2006;16(4):277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Postma A, De Haan EH. What was where? memory for object locations. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A. 1996;49(1):178–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eals M, Silverman I. The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethol Sociobiol. 1994;15(2):95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewin C, Wolgers G, Herlitz A. Sex differences favoring women in verbal but not in visuospatial episodic memory. Neuropsychology. 2001;15(2):165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinsick Park
    • 1
  • Ga In Shin
    • 1
  • Young Min Park
    • 1
  • In Young Kim
    • 1
  • Dong Pyo Jang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations