Demography

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 559–586 | Cite as

Women, Demography, and Politics: How Lower Fertility Rates Lead to Democracy

Article

Abstract

Where connections between demography and politics are examined in the literature, it is largely in the context of the effects of male aspects of demography on phenomena such as political violence. This project aims to place the study of demographic variables’ influence on politics, particularly on democracy, squarely within the scope of political and social sciences, and to focus on the effects of woman-related demographics—namely, fertility rate. I test the hypothesis that demographic variables—female-related predictors, in particular—have an independent effect on political structure. Comparing countries over time, this study finds a growth in democracy when fertility rates decline. In the theoretical framework developed, it is family structure as well as the economic and political status of women that account for this change at the macro and micro levels. Findings based on data for more than 140 countries over three decades are robust when controlling not only for alternative effects but also for reverse causality and data limitations.

Keywords

Fertility rate Democracy Demography and politics Family structure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Israel Institute in Washington, DC; the Institute of Israel and Jewish Studies; and the Department of Political Science at Columbia University for their support. I thank Victor Asal, David Rousseau, Irene Guiter Mazer, and Greg Worley for their thoughts and comments in earlier stages of the development of this project.

References

  1. Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2002). Democracy and the variability of economic performance. Economics & Politics, 14, 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F., & Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2), 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ananta, A. (2006). Demand for democracy in Indonesia: A demographic perspective. Asian Population Studies, 2, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ananta, A., Nurvidya, A., & Suryadinata, L. (2004). Indonesian electoral behaviour: A statistical perspective (Indonesia’s Population Series No. 2). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Barro, J. R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer, C. (2009). Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleaney, M., & Nishiyama, A. (2002). Explaining growth: A contest between models. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review, 50, 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. (1999). Fertility decline in the developed world: Where will it end? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 89, 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bongaarts, J. (2002). The end of the fertility transition in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 28, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22, 639–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breyer, F., & von der Schulenburg, J. M. G. (1990). Family ties and social security in a democracy. Public Choice, 67, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunnbauer, U. (2000). From equality without democracy to democracy without equality? Women and transition in southeast Europe. South-East Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs, 3(3), 151–168.Google Scholar
  14. Callaway, B. J. (1987). Women and political participation in Kano City. Comparative Politics, 19, 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chesnais, J.-C. (1998). Below-replacement fertility in the European Union (EU-15): Facts and policies, 1960–1997. Review of Population and Social Policy, 7, 83–101.Google Scholar
  16. Choucri, N. (1974). Population dynamics and international violence: Propositions, insights, and evidence. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Cincotta, R. P. (2009, October 9). How democracies grow up. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/09/how-democracies-grow-up/
  18. Cincotta, R. P., & Doces, J. (2012). The age-structural maturity thesis: The impact of the youth bulge on the advent and stability of liberal democracy. In J. A. Goldstone, E. P. Kaufmann, & M. D. Toft (Eds.), Political demography: How population changes are reshaping international security and national politics (pp. 98–116). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  19. Coale, A. J. (1986). Demographic effects of below-replacement fertility and their social implications. Population and Development Review, 12(Suppl.), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conzo, P., Fuochi, G., & Mencarini, L. (2017). Fertility and life satisfaction in rural Ethiopia. Demography, 54, 1331–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coppedge, M., Alvarez, A., & Maldonado, C. (2008). Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics, 70, 632–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cranmer, S. J., & Siverson, R. M. (2008). Demography, democracy and disputes: The search for the elusive relationship between population growth and international conflict. Journal of Politics, 70, 794–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dasgupta, P. S. (1995). Population, poverty, and the local environment. Scientific American, 272(2), 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, K., & van den Oever, P. (1982). Demographic foundations of new sex roles. Population and Development Review, 8, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de la Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2003). Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review, 93, 1091–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de la Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2009). To segregate or to integrate: Education politics and democracy. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 597–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38, 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalisation: Gauging its consequences. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dyson, T. (2012, February). On the democratic and demographic transitions. Paper presented at the Modern and Comparative Seminar, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Engels, F. (2010). The origin of the family, private property and the state. London, UK: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  33. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Feng, Y., & Zak, P. J. (1999). The determinants of democratic transitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43, 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Flammang, J. A. (1997). Women’s political voice: How women are transforming the practice and study of politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Forman-Rabinovici, A., & Sommer, U. (2018). An impediment to gender equality? Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy. World Development, 105, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Galor, O., & Zang, H. (1997). Fertility, income distribution, and economic growth: Theory and cross-country evidence. Japan and the World Economy, 9, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garrard, J., Tolz, V., & White, R. (2000). European democratization since 1800. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gerrity, J. C., Osborn, T., & Mendez, J. M. (2007). Women and representation: A different view of the district? Politics & Gender, 3, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gervasoni, C. (2010). A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics, 62, 302–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 712–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldstone, J. A. (1991). Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Goldstone, J. A., Kaufmann, E. P., & Toft, M. D. (Eds.). (2012). Political demography: How population changes are reshaping international security and national politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  45. Grant, J., Hoorens, S., Sivadasan, S., Loo, M. V. H., Davanzo, J., Hale, L., & Butz, W. (2006). Trends in European fertility: Should Europe try to increase its fertility rate . . . or just the consequences? International Journal of Andrology, 29, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hadenius, A. (1992). Democracy and development. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hadenius, A. (1994). The duration of democracy: Institutional vs. socio-economic factors. In D. Beetham (Ed.), Defining and measuring democracy (pp. 63–88). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2005). Cultural and economic prerequisites of democracy: Reassessing recent evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(4), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Huckle, P. (1981). The womb factor: Pregnancy policies and employment of women. Political Research Quarterly, 34, 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huntington, S. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York, NY: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Iversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2010). Women, work, and politics: The political economy of gender inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Joireman, S. F. (2007). Enforcing new property rights in sub-Saharan Africa: The Ugandan constitution and the 1998 Land Act. Comparative Politics, 39, 463–480.Google Scholar
  54. Krieckhaus, J. (2004). The regime debate revisited: A sensitivity analysis of democracy’s economic effects. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee, M. M. (1976). Why few women hold public office: Democracy and sexual roles. Political Science Quarterly, 91, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Madsen, E. L. (2012). Age structure and development through a policy lens. In J. A. Goldstone, E. P. Kaufmann, & M. D. Toft (Eds.), Political demography: How population changes are reshaping international security and national politics (pp. 81–97). Paradigm: Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  60. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McDonald, P. (2014). The demography of Indonesia in comparative perspective. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 50, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McIntosh, C. A. (1981). Low fertility and liberal democracy in western Europe. Population and Development Review, 7, 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McNicoll, G. (2011). Achievers and laggards in demographic transition: A comparison of Indonesia and Nigeria. Population and Development Review, 37, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mesquida, C. G., & Wiener, N. I. (1996). Human collective aggression: A behavioral ecology perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moller, H. (1968). Youth as a force in the modern world. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 10, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 5–34.Google Scholar
  67. Obermeyer, C. M. (1992). Islam, women, and politics: The demography of Arab countries. Population and Development Review, 18, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Donnell, G. (2004). The quality of democracy: Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Organski, A. F. K., Kugler, J., Johnson, J. T., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Births, deaths, and taxes: The demographic and political transitions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  70. Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. (2009). Pew Forum’s mapping the global Muslim population: A report on the size and distribution of the world’s Muslim population. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  72. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ross, M. (2006). Is democracy good for the poor? American Journal of Political Science, 50, 860–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rouyer, A. R. (1987). Political capacity and the decline of fertility in India. American Political Science Review, 81, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sapiro, V. (1981). Research frontier essay: When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. American Political Science Review, 75, 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sapiro, V. (1984). The political integration of women: Roles, socialization, and politics. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  77. Shenon, P. (1998, May 21). The fall of Suharto: The policy; Clinton welcomes Suharto’s exit but says Indonesia still needs “a real democratic change.” The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/21/world/fall-suharto-policy-clinton-welcomes-suharto-s-exit-but-says-indonesia-still.html
  78. Swers, M. L. (2013). Women in the club: Gender and policy making in the Senate. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tickner, J. A. (2005). What is your research program? Some feminist answers to international relations methodological questions. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tolleson-Rinehart, S. (1991). Do women leaders make a difference? Substance, style and perceptions. In D. L. Dodson (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 93–102). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  81. Tolleson-Rinehart, S., & Carroll, S. J. (2006). “Far from ideal”: The gender politics of political science. American Political Science Review, 100, 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Urdal, H. (2006). A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly, 50, 607–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Urdal, H. (2011, July). A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. Paper presented at the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Adolescents, Youth and Development, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  84. Urdal, H. (2012). Youth bulges and violence. In J. A. Goldstone, E. P. Kaufmann, & M. D. Toft (Eds.), Political demography: How population changes are reshaping international security and national politics (pp. 117–132). Paradigm: Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  85. Weber, H. (2013). Demography and democracy: The impact of youth cohort size on democratic stability in the world. Democratization, 20, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wejnert, B. (2003). The effects of growth of democracy and transition to market-based economies on women’s well-being. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 465–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Winter, J. M. (1988). Socialism, social democracy, and population questions in western Europe: 1870–1950. Population and Development Review, 14, 122–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Leading by example: Female members of Parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 921–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2017). Role models revisited: Youth, novelty, and the impact of female candidates. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5, 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zorn, C. J. W. (2001). Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 470–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations