Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic Differences in Multipartner Fertility Among Norwegian Men

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

This article analyzes male fertility, with a particular focus on multipartner fertility, for cohorts born 1955 to 1984 in Norway. We find that socioeconomically disadvantaged men have the lowest chance of becoming fathers and the lowest likelihood of fathering multiple children in stable unions. Multipartner fertility, on the other hand, is positively associated with both disadvantage and advantage: higher-order birth risks with a new partner are more prevalent among men with low as well as high socioeconomic status. An intervening factor among disadvantaged men may be a higher union dissolution risk, and an elevated risk among advantaged men may be associated with their higher preferences for children and other features that make these men more attractive to women as partners and fathers of future children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Low education is here defined as compulsory or 10 years of schooling; highest education is defined as college or university taking five or more years (e.g., a master’s degree or PhD, taking 18 or more years).

  2. We use a recent version of the standard in which the levels of education have been revised to be more compatible with international standards (see www.ssb.no/utniv_en/).

  3. 1 US$ = 5.80 NOK according to exchange rates as of March 14, 2012.

  4. The income of persons with zero earnings is set to 1 NOK.

  5. Only 0.02 % become fathers before they reach age 16.

  6. The full results from these models may be obtained from the authors.

References

  • Allison, P. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS® system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L. B., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., & Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research, 20(14), 313–352. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. (2000). Att skaffa barn på 2000-tallet. Vad påverkar viljan att bli föräldar? [Having children in the 2000s. What affects the wish to become parents?]. Framtider, 4, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, I., & Prskawetz, A. (2000). Fertility in second unions in Austria: Findings from the Austrian FFS. Demographic Research, 3(2). doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.3.2

  • Byberg, I. H., Foss, A. H., & Noack, T. (2001). Gjete kongens harer – rapport fra arbeidet med å få samboere mer innplassert i statistikken [Report on cohabitation in statistics]. Reports 2001/40. Oslo: Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban US parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 718–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., & Kaufman, G. (1996). Fertility and commitment: Bringing men back in. Population and Development Review, 22, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, N. D., Smith, N., & Stratton, L. S. (2007). Is marriage poisonous? Are relationships taxing? An analysis of the male marital wage differential in Denmark. Southern Economic Journal, 74, 412–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, K. B., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2007). Multipartnered fertility among American men. Demography, 44, 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härkönen, J., & Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce. A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henz, U. (2002). Childbirth in East and West German stepfamilies: Estimated probabilities from hazard rate models. Demographic Research, 7(6), 307–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoem, J. M. (1997). Educational gradients in divorce risks in Sweden in recent decades. Population Studies, 51, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalovaara, M. (2003). The joint effects of marriage partners’ socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demography, 40, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juby, H., & Le Bourdais, C. (1999). Where have all the children gone? Comparing mothers’ and fathers’ declarations in retrospective surveys. Canadian Studies in Population, 26, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H. (2002). Utdanning og ulikhet? En diskusjon av utdanningsnivåets betydning for deling av husarbeid blant småbarnsforeldre [Education and inequality? A discussion of the educational effect of the division of housework among parents with young children]. Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 3, 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H., & Pettersen, S. V. (2006). Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work Employment and Society, 20, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravdal, O., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2008). Changing relationship between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1960 to 1964. American Sociological Review, 73, 854–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, A. (2011, May). Are all the good men fathers? An analysis of earnings dynamics using sibling data. Paper presented at the ESOP workshop on Gender and Households, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappegård, T., Rønsen, M., & Skrede, K. (2011). Fatherhood and fertility. Fathering, 9, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2002). The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyngstad, T. (2004). The impact of parents’ and spouses’ education on divorce rates in Norway. Demographic Research, 10(5), 121–142. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2004.10.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manlove, J., Logan, C., Ikramullah, E., & Holcombe, E. (2008). Factors associated with multiple-partner fertility among fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 536–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., Smock, P. J., & Majumdar, D. (2004). The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-García, T. (2009). “Bring men back in”: A re-examination of the impact of type of education and educational enrolment on first births in Spain. European Sociological Review, 25, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oláh, L. S. (2001). Gender and family stability: Dissolution of the first parental union in Sweden and Hungary. Demographic Research, 4(2), 29–96. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2001.4.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, T., Penner, A., & Høgsnes, G. (2011). The male marital wage premium: Sorting versus differential pay. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 64, 283–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, M., Clarke, L., Peters, H. E., Ranjit, N., & Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of men’s fertility in the United States and Britain: A research note. Demography, 36, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. M., III, & Stratton, L. S. (2010). The male marital wage differential: Race, training, and fixed effects. Economic Inquiry, 48, 722–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rønsen, M., & Skrede, K. (2006). Nordic fertility patterns: Compatible with gender equality? In A.-L. Ellingsæter & A. Leira (Eds.), Politicising parenthood: Gender relations in Scandinavian welfare state restructuring (pp. 53–76). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rønsen, M., & Skrede, K. (2010). Can public policies sustain fertility in the Nordic countries? Lessons from the past and questions for the future. Demographic Research, 22, 321–346. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrede, K. (2004). Færre menn blir fedre [Fewer men are becoming fathers]. Økonomiske Analyzer, 6, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E. (2004). Step-families and childbearing desires in Europe. Demographic Research, Special Collection, 3(5), 117–134. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2009). Human development report 2009. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikat, A., Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies, 53, 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Research Council of Norway, and constitutes a part of the research project “Family dynamics, fertility choices, and family policy” (202442/S20). We are grateful for valuable comments from three anonymous referees and helpful suggestions from Torbjørn Hægeland, Øystein Kravdal, Turid Noack, Kjetil Telle, and participants at the XXVI IUSSP International Population Conference in Marrakech, Morocco, 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trude Lappegård.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lappegård, T., Rønsen, M. Socioeconomic Differences in Multipartner Fertility Among Norwegian Men. Demography 50, 1135–1153 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0165-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0165-1

Keywords

Navigation