Abstract
Fatalism about the inevitability of disruptive climate change has spread in recent years among environmentally concerned citizens. Slow moving, delayed, and ineffectual campaigns to limit greenhouse gas emissions have persuaded some observers that industrial societies are incapable of enacting and implementing thoroughgoing environmental reforms. This paper tries to counter this pessimism by outlining the circumstances that enabled rapid and far-reaching environmental reforms during the twentieth century. It does so through a comparative historical analysis of radical environmental reforms in Maine, the Great Plains, Cuba, and England. Three circumstances spurred these episodes of radical reform. Disruptive focusing events alarmed people by underlining sharp limits in the resources available to them. In response to the alarm, citizens and elites mobilized across scales to press for change. The changes occurred through corporatist political processes in which practitioners like farmers and real estate developers altered the norms governing environmentally consequential activities in ways beneficial to the environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acheson JM (2003) Capturing the commons: devising institutions to manage the Maine lobster industry. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.H
Bennett HH (1939) Soil conservation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Coughenour CM, Chamala S (2000) Conservation tillage and cropping innovation: constructing the new culture of agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Ia
Dahl RA (1978) Pluralism revisited. Comp Polit 10(2):191–203
Davis K (1963) The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Popul Index 29:345–366
Dryzek JS, Downes D, Hunold C, Schlosberg D (2003) Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Elson MJ (1986) Green belts: conflict mediation in the urban fringe. Heinemann, London, UK
Enriquez L (2003) Economic reform and repeasantization in post-1990 Cuba. Lat Am Res Rev 38(1):202–218
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) (2018) FAOSTAT. (http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E). Accessed on December 15, 2018
Feldmann M (2014) Coalitions and corporatism: the Slovenian political economy and the crisis. Gov Oppos 49(1):70–91
Fisher DR (2004) National governance and the global climate change regime. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md.
Funes Monzote R (2016) Sugar cane and historical transformations in Cuban agriculture. In: Latin American History: Oxford Research Encyclopedia. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.4
Gilbert J (2015) Planning democracy: agrarian intellectuals and the intended New Deal. Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct
Hall P, Gracey H, Drewett, D, Thomas R (1973) The containment of urban England, volumes I & II. London: George Allen & Unwin
Heberlein TA (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Kirkendall RS (1962) Franklin D. Roosevelt and the service intellectual. Miss Valley Hist Rev 49(3):456–471
Kraft ME (2016) Environmental policy and politics, 6th edn. Routledge, New York, N.Y
Lind M (2014) The “corporatist” confusion: why a prominent political term needs to be retired. Salon, January 5th, 2014. https://www.salon.com/2014/01/05/the_corporatist_confusion_why_a_prominent_political_term_needs_to_be_retired/
Mann M (1986) The sources of social power, volume I: a history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng
Manoilesco M (1936) Le siecle du corporatisme: Doctrine du corporatisme integral y pur. Libr. Felix Alcan, Paris
Mao KR, Hanley EA (2018) State corporatism and environmental harm: tax farming and desertification in northwestern China. J Agrar Change 18:848–868
Ministry of Works and Public Planning (1942a) Report of the Committee on Land Utilization in Rural Areas. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, England (Scott report)
Ministry of Works and Public Planning (1942b) Final Report of Expert Committee on Compensation and Betterment. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, Eng. (Uthwatt report)
Munton R (1983) London’s green belt: containment in practice. Allen and Unwin, London
Ollinaho O (2016) Environmental destruction as (objectively) uneventful and (subjectively) irrelevant. Environ Sociol 2(1):53–63
Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct
Orestes N, Conway E (2014) The collapse of western civilization: a view from the future. Columbia University Press, New York, NY
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York
Premat A (2012) Sowing change: the making of Havana’s urban agriculture. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, Tenn
Raper AF, Reid I (1941) Sharecroppers all. Russell and Russell, New York
Rudel TK (2019) Shocks, states, and sustainability: the origins of radical environmental reforms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Schmitter PC (1974) Still a century of corporatism? Rev Polit 36(1):85–131
Sklodowska E (2016) Invento, luego resisto: El periodo especial en Cuba como experiencias y metafora (1990–2015). Editorial Quarto Propio, Santiago, Chile
Van der Ploeg JD (2013) Peasants and the art of farming: a Chaynovian manifesto. Fernwood, Winnipeg and Halifax, Canada
Vogel D (2012) The politics of precaution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J
Walters BB, Vayda AP (2009) Event ecology, causal historical analysis, and human–environment research. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 99(3):534–553
World Resources Institute, Climate Data Explorer 2.0 (WRI-CAIT) (2015) Accessed on May 26th, 2015 at http://cait.wri.org/wri/Country%20GHG%20Emissions?indicator[]=TotalGHGEmissionsExcludingLand-UseChangeandForestry&indicator[]=TotalGHGEmissionsIncludingLand-UseChangeandForestry&year[]=2011&chartType=geo
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Tom Heberlein for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rudel, T.K. Shocks, states, and societal corporatism: a shorter path to sustainability?. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 429–436 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00560-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00560-1