Skip to main content

Shocks, states, and societal corporatism: a shorter path to sustainability?

Abstract

Fatalism about the inevitability of disruptive climate change has spread in recent years among environmentally concerned citizens. Slow moving, delayed, and ineffectual campaigns to limit greenhouse gas emissions have persuaded some observers that industrial societies are incapable of enacting and implementing thoroughgoing environmental reforms. This paper tries to counter this pessimism by outlining the circumstances that enabled rapid and far-reaching environmental reforms during the twentieth century. It does so through a comparative historical analysis of radical environmental reforms in Maine, the Great Plains, Cuba, and England. Three circumstances spurred these episodes of radical reform. Disruptive focusing events alarmed people by underlining sharp limits in the resources available to them. In response to the alarm, citizens and elites mobilized across scales to press for change. The changes occurred through corporatist political processes in which practitioners like farmers and real estate developers altered the norms governing environmentally consequential activities in ways beneficial to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Acheson JM (2003) Capturing the commons: devising institutions to manage the Maine lobster industry. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.H

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett HH (1939) Soil conservation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughenour CM, Chamala S (2000) Conservation tillage and cropping innovation: constructing the new culture of agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Ia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl RA (1978) Pluralism revisited. Comp Polit 10(2):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1963) The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Popul Index 29:345–366

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS, Downes D, Hunold C, Schlosberg D (2003) Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elson MJ (1986) Green belts: conflict mediation in the urban fringe. Heinemann, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez L (2003) Economic reform and repeasantization in post-1990 Cuba. Lat Am Res Rev 38(1):202–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) (2018) FAOSTAT. (http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E). Accessed on December 15, 2018

  • Feldmann M (2014) Coalitions and corporatism: the Slovenian political economy and the crisis. Gov Oppos 49(1):70–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DR (2004) National governance and the global climate change regime. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funes Monzote R (2016) Sugar cane and historical transformations in Cuban agriculture. In: Latin American History: Oxford Research Encyclopedia. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert J (2015) Planning democracy: agrarian intellectuals and the intended New Deal. Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Gracey H, Drewett, D, Thomas R (1973) The containment of urban England, volumes I & II. London: George Allen & Unwin

  • Heberlein TA (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkendall RS (1962) Franklin D. Roosevelt and the service intellectual. Miss Valley Hist Rev 49(3):456–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft ME (2016) Environmental policy and politics, 6th edn. Routledge, New York, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind M (2014) The “corporatist” confusion: why a prominent political term needs to be retired. Salon, January 5th, 2014. https://www.salon.com/2014/01/05/the_corporatist_confusion_why_a_prominent_political_term_needs_to_be_retired/

  • Mann M (1986) The sources of social power, volume I: a history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manoilesco M (1936) Le siecle du corporatisme: Doctrine du corporatisme integral y pur. Libr. Felix Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao KR, Hanley EA (2018) State corporatism and environmental harm: tax farming and desertification in northwestern China. J Agrar Change 18:848–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Works and Public Planning (1942a) Report of the Committee on Land Utilization in Rural Areas. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, England (Scott report)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Works and Public Planning (1942b) Final Report of Expert Committee on Compensation and Betterment. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, Eng. (Uthwatt report)

    Google Scholar 

  • Munton R (1983) London’s green belt: containment in practice. Allen and Unwin, London

  • Ollinaho O (2016) Environmental destruction as (objectively) uneventful and (subjectively) irrelevant. Environ Sociol 2(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct

    Google Scholar 

  • Orestes N, Conway E (2014) The collapse of western civilization: a view from the future. Columbia University Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Premat A (2012) Sowing change: the making of Havana’s urban agriculture. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, Tenn

    Google Scholar 

  • Raper AF, Reid I (1941) Sharecroppers all. Russell and Russell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK (2019) Shocks, states, and sustainability: the origins of radical environmental reforms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter PC (1974) Still a century of corporatism? Rev Polit 36(1):85–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklodowska E (2016) Invento, luego resisto: El periodo especial en Cuba como experiencias y metafora (1990–2015). Editorial Quarto Propio, Santiago, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg JD (2013) Peasants and the art of farming: a Chaynovian manifesto. Fernwood, Winnipeg and Halifax, Canada

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel D (2012) The politics of precaution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters BB, Vayda AP (2009) Event ecology, causal historical analysis, and human–environment research. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 99(3):534–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute, Climate Data Explorer 2.0 (WRI-CAIT) (2015) Accessed on May 26th, 2015 at http://cait.wri.org/wri/Country%20GHG%20Emissions?indicator[]=TotalGHGEmissionsExcludingLand-UseChangeandForestry&indicator[]=TotalGHGEmissionsIncludingLand-UseChangeandForestry&year[]=2011&chartType=geo

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tom Heberlein for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Rudel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rudel, T.K. Shocks, states, and societal corporatism: a shorter path to sustainability?. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 429–436 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00560-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00560-1

Keywords

  • Focusing events
  • Radical environmental reforms
  • Caged populations
  • Corporatism