Abstract
Many environmental studies and sciences (ESS) programs include courses that teach students how to interpret the landscape—to “read the land.” I argue that this practice fits Lee Shulman’s concept of a “signature pedagogy”: a pedagogy that is characteristic of a field or discipline and that implicitly shapes the character of future practice. One dimension of a signature pedagogy is its “implicit structure,” a set of beliefs about the attitudes, values, and dispositions it seeks to develop. Drawing on the work of Iris Murdoch and Lawrence Blum, I argue that teaching students how to read the land is aimed at developing their “moral perception”: their ability to appreciate the moral significance of the various elements of the landscape. This practice develops a certain kind of attentiveness to the landscape that ESS promotes, and should promote, as the mark of an environmentally knowledgeable and responsible person.
References
Anderson JGT (2017) “Why ecologists need natural history.” American Scientist (Sept/Oct): 290–297
Blum L (1994) Moral perception and particularity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brandt C (2004) A thirst for justice in the arid southwest. Educ Stud 36(1):93–107
Brandt C (2013) Landscapes as contexts for learning. In: Stevenson R, Brody M, Dillon J, Wals A (eds) International handbook of research on environmental education. Routledge, New York
Calder L (2006) Uncoverage: toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. J Am Hist 92(4):1358–1370
Fleischner TL (2001) Natural history and the spiral of offering. Wild Earth 11(3/4):10–13
Gruenewald D (2003) The best of both worlds: a critical pedagogy of place. Educ Res 32(4):3–12
Gurung R, Chick N, Haynie A (eds) (2009) Exploring signature pedagogies. Stylus Publishing, Sterling, Va
Leopold A (1966) A sand county almanac with essays on conservation from Round River. Ballantine Books, New York
Meine C (1988) Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Muir J (1998) My first summer in the Sierra. In The Wilderness Journeys. Edinburgh, Canongate Classics
Murdoch I (1971) The sovereignty of good. Schocken Books, New York
Nussbaum M (1990) Love’s knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schein R (1997) The place of landscape: toward a conceptual framework for interpreting an American scene. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 87(4):660–680
Shulman L (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 134:52–59
Thoreau HD (2001) Walking. In: Thoreau HD (ed) collected essays and poems. Library of America, New York
Tuck E, McKenzie M, McCoy K (2014) Land education: indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research 20(1):1–23
Tuck E, McKenzie M (2015) Place in research. Routledge, New York
Wayne J, Bogo M, Raskin M (2010) Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. J Soc Work Educ 46(3):327–339
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K. Reading the land: on the ethical foundations of environmental studies’ signature pedagogy. J Environ Stud Sci 8, 351–356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0488-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0488-3