Skip to main content

The Trump Administration and environmental policy: Reagan redux?


Since assuming office, President Trump has initiated a broad rollback of President Obama’s environmental policies. Political commentators have already drawn comparisons between the Reagan and Trump Administrations’ approaches to the environment given their shared explicit attacks on environmental policy. In this paper, I probe this historical resonance through a comparison of Trump’s and Reagan’s environmental records, and find continuities in their ideologies and actions. Despite the Reagan Administration’s efforts, environmental laws and institutions were not dismantled during the 1980s due to the countervailing forces of congress, the public, and environmental advocacy groups. But, while environmental laws and institutions may have been resilient in the past, contemporary political conditions call into question this resilience. Partisan polarization in both congress and the public and changes in the Republican Party will likely preclude an environmental backlash similar to that experienced by Reagan. Instead, environmental advocacy groups and the courts will function as the primary bulwarks against environmental policy retrenchment. Despite their efforts, the Trump Administration is likely to have significant impacts on environmental policy through executive action.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    According to the Washington Post’s running tracker of Trump’s efforts to undo Obama-era laws and regulations, as of December 14, 2017, Trump had tried to overturn 62 environmental rules and laws. This number is more than double that of his efforts in other policy sectors, including labor and finance (27), civil rights (16), health care (16), worker and consumer safety (15), government reform (13), immigration (12), and education (7) (Eilperin and Cameron 2017).

  2. 2.

    Given space constraints, I am only able to compare the environmental records of Trump and Reagan, but a comparison with George W. Bush would yield similar results. For an analysis of George W. Bush’s environmental policy and comparison with that of other presidents, see Daynes and Sussman (2010).

  3. 3.

    Wherum was a political appointee in the Office of Air and Radiation at EPA under the George W. Bush Administration. Bush nominated Wehrum to hold the position permanently, but his nomination was blocked by the Senate due to concerns about his enforcement of the Clean Air Act. As of December 15, 2017, Beck, Baptist, and Wherum have been confirmed, Wheeler is awaiting confirmation, and Dourson withdrew his nomination after Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Richard Burr (R-NC) announced they would not vote for his confirmation.

  4. 4.

    For its analysis, the Times created a database of all civil environmental enforcement cases initiated in the first nine months of the George W. Bush, Obama, and Trump Administrations using data from the EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance History Online database, as well as E.P.A. and Justice Department news releases, the federal register, court documents, and other public sources (How The Times Compared E.P.A. Enforcement Across Three Administrations 2017).

  5. 5.

    In another manuscript, currently in progress, I trace the development of American political party environmental ideology over a broader time period, from 1856 to 2016.

  6. 6.

    I exclude agriculture from my analysis due to space constraints and because it has always been treated as a distinct policy domain in party platforms.

  7. 7.

    Arrieta-Kenna frames this in the inverse way—the public comments were efficacious in preventing Secretary Zinke from recommending elimination of some national monuments, as was initially proposed.

  8. 8.

    The immediate reason for Watt’s resignation was not related to his policies, but rather a comment he made about the representativeness of a coal mining advisory commission: “We have every kind of mixture you can have, I have a black, I have a woman, two Jews and a cripple. And we have talent” (Weisman 1983).

  9. 9.

    Republicans controlled both the Senate and House in the 97th congress (1981–1983) and the Senate in the 98th (1983–1985) and 99th (1985–1987) congresses, but lost their majority in the 100th congress (1987–1989).

  10. 10.

    The researchers cast a relatively wide net in their analysis, using the label “climate denier” to denote any member of congress who “has questioned or denied the scientific consensus behind human-caused climate change; answered climate questions with the ‘I’m not a scientist’ dodge; claimed the climate is always changing (as a way to dodge the implications of human-caused warming); failed to acknowledge that climate change is a serious threat; or questioned the extent to which human beings contribute to global climate change” (Moser and Koronowski 2017). Their analysis also revealed that these members of congress received a total of $82,882,725 in campaign donations from the coal, oil, and gas industries.

  11. 11.

    Helvarg argues that the Republican congress under George W. Bush similarly failed to provide a check on the Bush Administration’s environmental rollback (Helvarg 2005).

  12. 12.

    Issues outranking environment included (in order of importance): the economy, terrorism, foreign policy, health care, gun policy, immigration, social security, education, Supreme Court appointments, treatment of racial and ethnic minorities, and trade policy (Pew 2016).


  1. Akin S (2017) Some GOP lawmakers push back against EPA cuts. Roll Call.

  2. Arrieta-Kenna R (2017) After public outcry, the Interior Department won’t eliminate any national monuments. Vox.

  3. Barber M, McCarty N (2013) Causes and consequences of polarization. In: Mansbridge J, Martin CJ (eds) Negotiating agreement in politics. American Political Science Association Task Force Report, pp 19–53

  4. Bravender R (2017) State lawyers use Pruitt’s playbook against him – by suing. E&E News.

  5. Broder JM (2010) Climate change is Tea Party article of faith. The New York Times.

  6. Budge I, Hofferbert RI (1990) Mandates and policy outputs: US Party platforms and federal expenditures. American Political Science Review 84(1):111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cahlink G (2017) Usually fractious Freedom Caucus works quietly on energy. E&E News.

  8. Carswell C (2017) Scott Pruitt isn’t the first administrator hostile to the EPA’s mission. High Country News.

  9. Center for Biological Diversity (2017) Trump lawsuit tracker.

  10. Davenport C (2016) Rick Perry, Ex-Governor of Texas, is Trump’s pick as energy secretary. The New York Times.

  11. Davenport C (2017a) E.P.A. workers try to block Pruitt in show of defiance. The New York Times.

  12. Davenport C (2017b) With E.P.A. cuts, states would lose help in emergencies. The New York Times.

  13. Davenport C, Fandos N (2017) As Interior Secretary swaggers through parks, his staff rolls back regulations. The New York Times.

  14. Davenport C, Lipton E (2016) Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, climate change denialist, to lead E.P.A. The New York Times.

  15. Davenport C, Lipton E (2017a) How G.O.P. leaders came to view climate change as fake science. The New York Times.

  16. Davenport C, Lipton E (2017b) Scoett Pruitt is carrying out his EPA agenda in secret, critics say. The New York Times.

  17. Daynes BW, Sussman G (2010) White House politics and the environment: Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dennis B (2017a) EPA to set aside $12 million for buyouts in the coming months. The Washington Post.

  19. Dennis B (2017b) EPA head defends White House’s plans for massive cuts to his agency. The Washington Post.

  20. Dennis B, Eilperin J (2017) Trump’s budget takes a sledgehammer to the EPA. The Washington Post.

  21. Dunlap RE (1987) Public opinion on the environment in the Reagan era: polls, pollution, and politics revisited. Environment 29:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2016) Trump has picked the most conservative EPA leader since 1981. This one will face much less resistance. The Washington Post.

  23. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2017) Climate change: US public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science 20(1):209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eilperin J, Cameron D (2017) How Trump is rolling back Obama’s legacy. The Washington Post.

  25. Eilperin J, Mooney C, Mufson S (2017) New EPA documents reveal even deeper proposed cuts to staff and programs. The Washington Post.

  26. Fears D (2017) Zinke defends huge job cuts at Interior: ‘this is what a balanced budget looks like.’ The Washington Post.

  27. Flavelle C, Migliozzi B, Murphy P (2017) Trump’s environmental spending cuts could cost Republican districts billions. Bloomberg Politics.

  28. Fountain H (2016) Trump’s climate contrarian: Myron Ebell takes on the E.P.A. The New York Times.

  29. Gerring J (2001) Party ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grandoni D (2017) The Energy 202: The EPA just got its second most important person after Scott Pruitt. The Washington Post.

  31. Guskin E (2017) By the numbers, Trump’s big environmental regulation rollback is all kinds of unpopular. The Washington Post.

  32. Hare C, Poole KT (2014) The polarization of contemporary American politics. Polity 46(3):411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Helvarg, D (2005) Bush: the environmental record. Earth Island J Winter: 25–30

  34. Henry D (2017) Senate confirms top air regulator at EPA. The Hill.

  35. How the Times compared E.P.A. enforcement across three administrations. (2017) The New York Times.

  36. Kaplan S, Lipton E (2017) Chemical industry ally faces critics in bid for top E.P.A. post. The New York Times.

  37. Keele D, Malmsheimer RW (2016) Is the ninth circuit a liberal environmental activist court? Justice System Journal 37(2):115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Klyza CM, Sousa DJ (2013) American environmental policy: beyond gridlock. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kovacic WE (1991) The Reagan judiciary and environmental policy: the impact of appointments to the federal courts of appeals. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 18(4):669–713

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kraft ME (2000) U.S. environmental policy and politics: from the 1960s to the 1990s. Journal of Policy History 12(1):17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kraft ME, Vig NJ (1984) Environmental policy in the Reagan presidency. Political Science Quarterly 99(3):415–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Layzer JA (2009) Environmental policy from 1980–2008: the politics of prevention. In: Glenn BJ, Teles SM (eds) Conservatism and American political development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 223–260.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Layzer JA (2012) Open for business: Conservatives' opposition to environmental regulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lavelle M (2017) Partisan divide in congress wider than ever on environmental issues, groups says. Inside Climate News.

  45. Leavenworth S (2017) Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ energy policies are being met by ‘sue, baby, sue.’ The Miami Herald.

  46. Leber R (2017) These Republicans are pretty upset about Trump’s EPA budget. Mother Jones.

  47. Leven R (2017) “Do the opposite thing you did 18 month ago”: EPA staffers on the agency in the Trump era. Vox.

  48. Lipton E (2017) Why has the E.P.A. shifted on toxic chemicals? An industry insider helps call the shots. The New York Times.

  49. Lipton E, Ivory D (2017) Under Trump, E.P.A. has slowed actions against polluters, and put limits on enforcement officers. The New York Times.

  50. McCarty N, Poole KT, Rosenthal H (2006) Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moser C, Koronowski R (2017) The climate denier caucus in Trump’s Washington. Think Progress.

  52. Mufson S (2017a) Trump would increase Energy Department funds to manage nuclear stockpile. The Washington Post.

  53. Mufson S (2017b) Polluter fines drop 60 percent under Trump. The Washington Post.

  54. Pew Research Center (2016) Top voting issues in 2016 election. 2016 campaign: strong interest, widespread dissatisfaction.

  55. Pomper GM (1967) “If elected, I promise”: American party platforms. Midwest Journal of Political Science 11(3):318–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pomper GM, Lederman SS (1980) Elections in America: control and influence in democratic politics. Longman Publishing Group, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  57. Puko T (2017) Hundreds of EPA workers leave in recent days. The Wall Street Journal.

  58. Reinhold R (1981) Regan aides fail to mollify worried scientists. The New York Times.

  59. Republican Party Platform, 1976

  60. Republican Party Platform, 1980

  61. Republican Party Platform, 1988

  62. Republican Party Platform, 1992

  63. Republican Party Platform, 1996

  64. Republican Party Platform, 2000

  65. Republican Party Platform, 2004

  66. Republican Party Platform, 2008

  67. Republican Party Platform, 2012

  68. Republican Party Platform, 2016

  69. Rucker P, Dawsey J, Parker A (2017) ‘He’s not weak, is he?’: Inside Trump’s quest to alter the judiciary. The Washington Post.

  70. Savage C (2017) Trump is rapidly reshaping the judiciary. Here’s how. The New York Times.

  71. Shabecoff P (1981a) Deep cuts expected in ecology agencies. The New York Times.

  72. Shabecoff P (1981b) New environmental chief vows to lift regulatory ‘overburden.’ The New York Times.

  73. Shabecoff P (1981c) Funds and staff for protecting environment may be halved. The New York Times.

  74. Shabecoff P (1981d) 36% cut in budget reportedly urged for ecology unit. The New York Times.

  75. Shabecoff P (1982a) U.S. environmental agency making deep staffing cuts. The New York Times.

  76. Shabecoff P (1982b) Environmental chief claims a budget victory. The New York Times.

  77. Shabecoff P (1983) Environmental agency: deep and persisting woes. The New York Times.

  78. Shabecoff P (1989) Reagan and environment: to many, a stalemate. The New York Times.

  79. Shogren E (2017) Trump’s judges: A second front in the environmental onslaught. Yale Environment 360.

  80. Tabuchi H (2017) What’s at stake in Trump’s proposed E.P.A. cuts. The New York Times.

  81. Tong S (2017) EPA attacks harken back to Reagan era. Marketplace.

  82. Weisman S (1983) Watt quits post; president accepts with ‘reluctance.’ The New York Times.

  83. Wenner LM (1982) The environmental decade in court. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wenner LM, Ostberg C (1994) Restraint in environmental cases by Reagan-Bush judicial appointees. Judicature 77:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wood BD, Waterman RW (1991) The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. Am Polit Sci Rev 85(3):801–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Hejny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hejny, J. The Trump Administration and environmental policy: Reagan redux?. J Environ Stud Sci 8, 197–211 (2018).

Download citation


  • Environmental policy
  • Trump Administration
  • Partisanship and environment