The role of media actors in reframing the media discourse in the decision to reject relicensing the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant



This paper examines 8 years of news media discourse on the operation of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant leading up to a 2010 vote by Vermont legislators to reject relicensing the facility. Nuclear power license decisions are usually solely under the purview of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; but Vermont legislators required the facility to also seek approval from the Vermont Legislature, presenting a unique case where state legislators have a direct vote on a nuclear power plant. Over the 8 years of the case study, we find that opposition narratives highlighting an aging, unsafe facility managed by an untrustworthy corporation increased while pro-Vermont Yankee narratives of reliable energy, technical competence, and economic progress decreased. We analyze the changes in the media discourse through examining changes in media frames, the media actors, their sponsorship activities, and the narrative integrity of the frames. These findings are instructive in understanding the factors contributing to changes in the media culture around news coverage of nuclear power.


Nuclear power Media discourse Vermont 


  1. Associated Press (2005) Lawmakers to face issues on Vermont Yankee. Montpelier, Vermont, January 9Google Scholar
  2. Associated Press (2006) Douglas signs bill giving lawmakers say in nuke’s future. Montpelier, Vermont, May 21Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht SL, Amey RG (1999) Myth-making, moral communities, and policy failure in solving the radioactive waste problem. Soc and Nat Resources 12:741–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benford RD (1993) Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Soc Forces 71(3):677–701Google Scholar
  5. Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 26:611–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett LW (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the united states. J Commun 40:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaghan K, Schnell F (2001) Assessing the democratic debate: how the news media frame elite policy discourse. Polit Commun 18:183–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carragee KM, Roefs W (2004) The neglect of power in recent framing research. J Commun 54:214–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carragee K, Ryan C (1998) Media, movements, and the quest for social justice. J Appl Commun Res 26:165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper M, Sussman D (2011) Nuclear power loses support in new poll. New York Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas J (2010) “State of the state address,” 7 January, Accessed 29 Sept 2011
  12. Eckstein R (1997) Nuclear power and social power. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Entergy (2011a) EntergyFACTS. Accessed 26 Sept 2011
  14. Entergy (2011b) Company History. Accessed 26 Sept 2011
  15. Entman RM (2003) Cascading activation: contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Polit Commun 20:415–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Entman RM (2007) Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J Commun 57:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan D, Holway W (1994) Media coverage of cocaine and its impact on usage patterns. Int J Public Opin Res 6:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan D, Tims A (1989) The impact of the news media on public opinion: American presidential election 1987–1988. Int J Public Opin Res 1:88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher W (1987) Human communication as narration. University of South Carolina Press, South CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  20. Galbraith K (2008) Climate enters debate over nuclear power. New York Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Gamson WA (1992) Talking politics. Cambridge University Press, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Gamson WA (2005) Movement impact on cultural change. In: Pfohl S, Van Wagenen A, Arend P et al (eds) Culture, power and history: studies in critical sociology. Brill Academic Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 95:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gitlin T (1980) The whole world is watching. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  25. Gram D (2003) Vermont Yankee critics lead on license question. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  26. Gram D (2006a) VT nuke wins approval to store more waste, finish power boost. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  27. Gram D (2006b) Vermont Yankee nuke plant’s critics still at it, 34 years later. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  28. Gram D (2007a) Some wonder: is Vermont Yankee showing its age? Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  29. Gram D (2007b) Aging nuclear plant raises questions about life without it. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  30. Gram D (2008a) Vermont: senate says decommissioning must be full before Vermont Yankee nuclear sale. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  31. Gram D (2008b) Wide-ranging veto battle focuses on Vermont Yankee. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  32. Gram D (2008c) Douglas administration questions Entergy reorganization. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  33. Gram D (2008d) Lawmakers want guarantees about nuke plant decommissioning. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  34. Gram D (2008e) Entergy’s stance on decommissioning fund appears to change. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  35. Gram D (2008f) VPIRG calls for closing Vermont Yankee in 2012. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  36. Gram D (2008g) NRC gives VT. reactor good review. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  37. Gram D (2009) Vt. Gov. Douglas vetoes nuke decommissioning bill. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  38. Gram D (2010a) 2nd Vt. Yankee well tests positive for isotope. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  39. Gram D (2010b) Vt nuke plant leaks renew debate over aging plants. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  40. Gram D (2010c) Top Vermont Yankee official ‘relieved of duties’. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  41. Gram D (2010d) Future of Vt. nuke plant in balance in senate vote. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  42. Gram D (2010e) Vermont Senate votes to close nuke plant in 2012. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  43. Gram D (2010f) Gov. to lawmakers: hold off on Vermont Yankee vote. Associated Press, MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  44. Greenberg J (2005) This news may come as a shock: the politics and press coverage of electricity restructuring in Ontario, 1995–2002. Can J Commun 30:233–258Google Scholar
  45. Greider T, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Soc 59:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Iyengar S (1990) Framing responsibility for political issues: the case of poverty. Polit Behav 12:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jasper J (1997) The art of moral protest: culture, biography and creativity in social movements. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Kingdon J (1984) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. University of Michigan: Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Krippendorff K (1980) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  50. Lawrence RG (2010) Researching political news framing: established ground and new horizons. In: D’Angelo P, Kuypers J (eds) Doing news framing analysis: empirical and theoretical perspectives. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. McCombs M, Shaw D (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opin Q 36:176–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (2010) Report of investigation Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee. Philadelphia, PA, February 22, 2010Google Scholar
  53. Nuclear Energy Institute (2011) Nuclear statistics. Accessed 19 Dec 2011
  54. Palfreman J (2006) A tale of two fears: exploring media depictions of nuclear power and global warming. Rev Policy Res 23:23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  56. Perron D (2008) Vermont Yankee fallout. WCAX, Accessed 28 Sept 2011
  57. Reese SD (2007) The framing project: a bridging model for media research revisited. J Commun 57:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Riffe D, Lacy S et al (2005) Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson S (2002) Yankee sold to Entergy. Burlington Free Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  60. Scheufele D (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 49:103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Steensland B (2008) Why do policy frames change? Actor-idea coevolution in debates over welfare reform. Soc Forces 86:1027–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Throgmorton JA (1996) Planning as persuasive storytelling: the rhetorical construction of Chicago’s electric future. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Tuchman G (1978) Making news: a study in the construction of reality. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011) Status of license renewal applications and industry activities. Accessed 23 Sept 2011
  65. Vermont Department of Public Service (1996) Biennnial report of the department of public service: 1 July 1994–30 June 1996. Montpelier, VermontGoogle Scholar
  66. Vermont Public Service Board (2002) Memorandum Of understanding among Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, Llc, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, Green MountainGoogle Scholar
  67. Vermont Secretary of State (2011) Lobbyist disclosure forms. Accessed 28 Sept 2011
  68. Winner L (1986) The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in the age of high technology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transportation Research Center & Community Development and Applied EconomicsUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Farrell HallUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations