Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 423–436 | Cite as

Fertilizer and activated carbon production by hydrothermal carbonization of digestate

  • X. Zhao
  • G. C. Becker
  • N. Faweya
  • C. Rodriguez Correa
  • S. Yang
  • X. Xie
  • A. Kruse
Original Article

Abstract

In this study, the efficiency of recycling phosphate from digestate through hydrothermal carbonization and subsequent production of an activated carbon with high surface area was investigated. Phosphate fractionation was conducted to understand the phosphate existing forms in hydrochars and the recovery mechanism. Hydrothermal carbonization was conducted in a 250 mL batch reactor at three different temperatures (190, 220, and 250 °C), through this process, more than 92.6% of digestate phosphate was recovered into the hydrochars, mostly in the form of precipitated calcium phosphate. Through leaching the hydrochars with sulfuric acid, 88.9 to 94.3% of the total digestate phosphate was recovered in the acid solution. Untreated and acid-leached hydrochars were subjected to a chemical activation process with KOH. The surface area of the products was comparable to commercial activated carbon and was composed mainly of micropores. The activated carbon generated from acid-leached hydrochar showed higher microporosity (up to 1762 m2 g−1) and better adsorption capacity (656.7 to 788.0 mg methylene blue per gram activated carbon).

Keywords

Digestate Hydrothermal carbonization Acid leaching Phosphate recovery Activated carbon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely appreciate Ms. D. Neumann-Walter, Mr. K. Hermann, and Mr. A. Lautenbach from the Institute of Catalysis Research and Technology (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany), for conducting the N2 isotherms, ICP-OES, and phosphate measurement, respectively. Thanks also go to Ms. M. Wunderlich for her assistant in the lab and the Bauer family for providing the digestate. The authors acknowledge the scholarship provided by China Scholarship Council.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cordell D, Drangert J, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Chang 19:292–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroiss H, Rechberger H, Egle L (2011) Phosphorus in water quality and waste management. In: Kumar S (ed) Integrated waste management—volume II, ISBN: 978-953-307-447-4. INTECH, pp 181–214. http://www.intechopen.com/books/integrated-waste-management-volume-ii/phosphorus-in-water-quality-and-waste-management
  3. 3.
    Zeng RJ, Lemaire R, Yuan Z, Keller J (2003) Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 84:170–178.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci 12:242–257.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Field JA, Caldwell JS, Jeyanayagam S et al (1984) Fertilizer recovery from anaerobic digesters. Trans ASAE 27:56–60.  10.13031/2013.33060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiland P (2006) Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany. Eng Life Sci 6:302–309.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200620128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bachmann S, Uptmoor R, Eichler-Löbermann B (2016) Phosphorus distribution and availability in untreated and mechanically separated biogas digestates. Sci Agric 73:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rehl T, Müller J (2011) Life cycle assessment of biogas digestate processing technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl 56:92–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bermejo GD (2012) Agro-ecological aspects when applying the remaining products from agricultural biogas processes as fertilizer in crop production. Dissertation. Humboldt Universität zu BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Funke A, Ziegler F (2010) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4:160–177.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kruse A, Funke A, Titirici M-M (2013) Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels and energetic materials. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17:515–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reza MT, Mumme J, Ebert A (2015) Characterization of hydrochar obtained from hydrothermal carbonization of wheat straw digestate. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 5:425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0163-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reza MT, Lynam JG, Uddin MH, Coronella CJ (2013) Hydrothermal carbonization: fate of inorganics. Biomass Bioenergy 49:86–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arthurson V (2009) Closing the global energy and nutrient cycles through application of biogas residue to agricultural land-potential benefits and drawbacks. Energies 2:226–242.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en20200226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kruse A, Grandl R (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization: 3. Kinetic model. Chemie Ing Tech 87:449–456.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201400116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karayildirim T, Sinaǧ A, Kruse A (2008) Char and coke formation as unwanted side reaction of the hydrothermal biomass gasification. Chem Eng Technol 31:1561–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200800278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirschhöfer F, Sahin O, Becker GC et al (2016) Wastewater treatment – adsorption of organic micropollutants on activated HTC-carbon derived from sewage sludge. Water Sci Technol 73:607–616.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu B, Wang K, Wu L et al (2010) Engineering carbon materials from the hydrothermal carbonization process of biomass. Adv Mater 22:813–828.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodriguez Correa C, Otto T, Kruse A (2017) Biomass and bioenergy influence of the biomass components on the pore formation of activated carbon. Biomass Bioenergy 97:53–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahmad F, Daud WMAW, Ahmad MA, Radzi R (2013) The effects of acid leaching on porosity and surface functional groups of cocoa (Theobroma cacao)-shell based activated carbon. Chem Eng Res Des 91:1028–1038.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Starck J, Burg P, Cagniant D et al (2004) The effect of demineralisation on a lignite surface properties. Fuel 83:845–850.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dai L, Tan F, Wu B et al (2015) Immobilization of phosphorus in cow manure during hydrothermal carbonization. J Environ Manag 157:49–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ekpo U, Ross AB, Camargo-Valero MA, Williams PT (2016) A comparison of product yields and inorganic content in process streams following thermal hydrolysis and hydrothermal processing of microalgae, manure and digestate. Bioresour Technol 200:951–960.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu G, Zhang Y, Guo B et al (2014) Nutrient flows and quality of bio-crude oil produced via catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of low-lipid microalgae. BioEnergy Res 7:1317–1328.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9471-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    López Barreiro D, Riede S, Hornung U et al (2015) Hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae: effect on the product yields of the addition of an organic solvent to separate the aqueous phase and the biocrude oil. Algal Res 12:206–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heilmann SM, Molde JS, Timler JG et al (2014) Phosphorus reclamation through hydrothermal carbonization of animal manures. Environ Sci Technol 48:10323–10329.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es501872k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chakraverty A, Mishra P, Banerjee HD (1988) Investigation of combustion of raw and acid-leached rice husk for production of pure amorphous white silica. J Mater Sci 23:21–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mishra P, Chakraverty A, Banerjee HD (1985) Production and purification of silicon by calcium reduction of rice-husk white ash. J Mater Sci 20:4387–4391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00559326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Funke A, Mumme J, Koon M, Diakité M (2013) Cascaded production of biogas and hydrochar from wheat straw: energetic potential and recovery of carbon and plant nutrients. Biomass Bioenergy 58:229–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wirth B, Mumme J, Erlach B (2012) Anaerobic treatment of waste water derived from hydrothermal carbonization. 20th Eur Biomass Conf Exhib 18–22 June 2012, Milan, Italy Anaerob 18–22. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5071/20thEUBCE2012-2AO.4.3
  31. 31.
    Funke A (2015) Fate of plant available nutrients during hydrothermal carbonization of digestate. Chemie Ing Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201400182
  32. 32.
    Reza MT, Werner M, Pohl M, Mumme J (2014) Evaluation of integrated anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonization for bioenergy production. J Vis Exp 15:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3791/51734 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    González Medeiros JJ, Pérez Cid B, Fernández Gómez E (2005) Analytical phosphorus fractionation in sewage sludge and sediment samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 381:873–878.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2989-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association WPCF (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van Soest PJ, Robertson J, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597.  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rouquerol J, Liewellyn P, Rouquerol F (2007) Is the BET equation applicable to microporous adsorbents? In: Llewellyn P, Rodriguez Reinoso F, Rouqerol J, Seaton N (eds) Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. Charact. Porous solids VII, 1st edn. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bobleter O (1994) Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plants. Prog Polym Sci 19:797–841.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6700(94)90033-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mauseth JD (2008) Plant anatomy. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mussatto SI, Fernandes M, Milagres AMF, Roberto IC (2008) Effect of hemicellulose and lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose from brewer’s spent grain. Enzym Microb Technol 43:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Massé DI, Croteau F, Masse L (2007) The fate of crop nutrients during digestion of swine manure in psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour Technol 98:2819–2823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Callander IJ, Barford JP (1983) Precipitation, chelation, and the availability of metals as nutrients in anaerobic digestion. I. Methodology. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:1947–1957.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260250805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dinjus E, Kruse A, Tröger N (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization—1. Influence of lignin in lignocelluloses. Chem Eng Technol 34:2037–2043.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201100487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Peterson AA, Vogel F, Lachance RP et al (2008) Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub- and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ Sci 1:32.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b810100k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mumme J, Eckervogt L, Pielert J et al (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested maize silage. Bioresour Technol 102:9255–9260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kruse A, Dahmen N (2015) Water—a magic solvent for biomass conversion. J Supercrit Fluids 96:36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2014.09.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Funke A, Reebs F, Kruse A (2013) Experimental comparison of hydrothermal and vapothermal carbonization. Fuel Process Technol 115:261–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wiedner K, Naisse C, Rumpel C et al (2013) Chemical modification of biomass residues during hydrothermal carbonization—what makes the difference, temperature or feedstock? Org Geochem 54:91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Falco C, Baccile N, Titirici M-M (2011) Morphological and structural differences between glucose, cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass derived hydrothermal carbons. Green Chem 13:3273.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15742f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kruse A, Badoux F, Grandl R, Wüst D (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization: 2. Kinetics of draff conversion. Chem Ing Tech 84:509–512.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201100168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Huang R, Tang Y (2015) Speciation dynamics of phosphorus during (hydro) thermal treatments of sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 49:14466–14474.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lopez Barreiro D, Samori C, Terranella G et al (2014) Assessing microalgae biorefinery routes for the production of biofuels via hydrothermal liquefaction. Bioresour Technol 174:256–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Heilmann SM, Jader LR, Sadowsky MJ et al (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of distiller’s grains. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2526–2533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stemann J, Ziegler F (2011) Hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC): recycling of process water. Proc. 19th Eur. Biomass Conf. Exhib. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5071/19thEUBCE2011-OC8.2
  55. 55.
    Qian T, Jiang H (2014) Migration of phosphorus in sewage sludge during different thermal treatment processes. Sustain Chem Eng 2:1411–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yanagida T, Minowa T, Nakamura A et al (2008) Behavior of inorganic elements in poultry manure during supercritical water gasification. Journal Japan Inst Energy 87:731–736.  https://doi.org/10.3775/jie.87.731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mekmene O, Quillard S, Rouillon T et al (2009) Effects of pH and Ca/P molar ratio on the quantity and crystalline structure of calcium phosphates obtained from aqueous solutions. Dairy Sci Technol 89:301–316.  https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/2009019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhu W, ZR X, Li L, He C (2011) The behavior of phosphorus in sub- and super-critical water gasification of sewage sludge. Chem Eng J 171:190–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lynam JG, Reza MT, Vasquez VR, Coronella CJ (2012) Effect of salt addition on hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Fuel 99:271–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jung D, Dahmen N, Kruse A (2016) Improving the representation and modelling of hydrothermal carbonization. Master thesis. University of HohenheimGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Liu Y, Kumar S, Kwag JH, Ra C (2013) Magnesium ammonium phosphate formation, recovery and its application as valuable resources: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.3936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Becker GC, Dahmen N, Kruse A (2014) Rückgewinnung von chemisch/biologisch eliminiertem Abwasserphosphat mittels MAP-Fällung aus Prozesswasser der hydrothermalen Karbonisierung von Klärschlamm. Master thesis. University of HohenheimGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rodríguez Correa C, Stollovsky M, Hehr T et al (2017) Influence of the carbonization process on activated carbon properties from lignin and lignin-rich biomasses. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8222–8233.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rodríguez Correa C, Bernardo M, Ribeiro RPPL et al (2017) Evaluation of hydrothermal carbonization as a preliminary step for the production of functional materials from biogas digestate. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 124:461–474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Klopper L, Strydom CA, Bunt JR (2012) Influence of added potassium and sodium carbonates on CO2 reactivity of the char from a demineralized inertinite rich bituminous coal. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 96:188–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pels JR, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA et al (1995) Evolution of nitrogen functionalities in carbonaceous materials during pyrolysis. Carbon N Y 33:1641–1653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00154-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fuente E, Gil RR, Girón RP et al (2010) Evidence for the presence of cyanide during carbon activation by KOH. Carbon N Y 48:1032–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Socrates G (2001) Infrared and raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and charts, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West SussexGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW et al (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV et al (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nunes CA, Guerreiro MC (2011) Estimation of surface area and pore volume of activated carbons by methylene blue and iodine numbers. Quim Nova 34:472–476.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422011000300020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Baçaoui A, Yaacoubi A, Dahbi A et al (2001) Optimization of conditions for the preparation of activated carbons from olive-waste cakes. Carbon N Y 39:425–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00135-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Alaya MN, Hourieh MA, Youssef AM, El-Sejariah F (2009) Adsorption properties of activated carbons prepared from olive stones by chemical and physical activation. Adsorpt Sci Technol 18:27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617001493251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Namane A, Mekarzia A, Benrachedi K et al (2005) Determination of the adsorption capacity of activated carbon made from coffee grounds by chemical activation with ZnCl2 and H3PO4. J Hazard Mater 119:189–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Agricultural EngineeringHohenheim UniversityStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.College of Resources and Environmental SciencesChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations