Abstract
In many countries, pre-service teacher education programs are structured so that mathematics content is taught in the university’s mathematics department and mathematics pedagogy in the education department. Such program structures make it difficult to authentically interweave content with pedagogy in ways that acknowledge the roles of both mathematicians and mathematics educators in preparing future teachers. This article reports on a project that deliberately fostered collaboration between mathematicians and mathematics educators in six Australian universities in order to investigate the potential for learning at the boundaries between the two disciplinary communities. Data sources included two rounds of interviews with mathematicians and mathematics educators and annual reports prepared by each participating university over the three years of the project. The study identified interdisciplinary boundary practices that led to integration of content and pedagogy through new courses co-developed and co-taught by mathematicians and mathematics educators, and new approaches to building communities of pre-service teachers. It also developed an evidence-based classification of conditions that enable or hinder sustained collaboration across disciplinary boundaries, together with an empirical grounding for Akkerman and Bakker’s conceptualisation of transformation as a mechanism for learning at the boundary between communities. The study additionally highlighted the ambiguous nature of boundaries and implications for brokers who work there to connect disciplinary paradigms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
Akkerman, S., & Bruining, T. (2016). Multilevel boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 240–284.
Andersson, A., & Lindström, B. (2017). Making collaboration work—developing boundary work and boundary awareness in emergency exercises. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(4), 286–303.
Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Barton, B., & Sheryn, L. (2009). The mathematical needs of secondary teachers: data from three countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(1), 101–108.
Bennison, A., & Goos, M. (2016). Learning at the boundaries: collaboration between mathematicians and mathematics educators within and across institutions. In B. White, M. Chinnapan, & S. Trenholm (Eds.), Opening up mathematics education research (Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 124–131). Adelaide: MERGA.
Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Perry, K., & Presley, J. B. (2012). Improving postsecondary STEM education: strategies for successful collaboration and brokering across disciplinary paradigms. APLU/SMTI Paper 4. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. Retrieved 30 August 2017 from http://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/stem-education/SMTI_Library/APLU-SMTI-Paper-4/file
Brown, P. (2013). Integrating medical and environmental sociology with environmental health: crossing boundaries and building connections through advocacy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(2), 145–164.
Chan, S. (2012). Perspectives of new trades tutors: boundary crossing between vocational identities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 409–421.
Cremers, P., Wals, A., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Utilization of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science, 45(2), 289–309.
Department of Education and Training (DET). (2016). Enhancing the training of mathematics and science teachers program. Retrieved 30 August 2017 from https://www.education.gov.au/enhancing-training-mathematics-and-science-teachers-program
Fried, M. (2014). Mathematics and mathematics education: searching for common ground. In M. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: searching for common ground (pp. 3–22). New York: Springer.
Goldin, G. (2003). Developing complex understandings on the relation of mathematics education research to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 171–202.
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 258–291.
Goos, M. (2014). Creating opportunities to learn in mathematics education: a sociocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 439–457.
Goos, M. (2015). Learning at the boundaries. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics in the margins (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 269–276). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.
Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2008). Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: emergence of an online community of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 41–60.
Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2017). Learning at the boundaries in pre-service mathematics teacher education. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 199). Singapore: PME.
Hodgson, B. (2001). The mathematical education of school teachers: role and responsibilities of university mathematicians. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI Study (pp. 501–518). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ishimaru, A., Torres, K., Salvador, J., Lott, J., Williams, D., & Tran, C. (2016). Reinforcing deficit, journeying towards equity: cultural brokering in family engagement initiatives. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 850–882.
Jackson, N. (2003). Engaging and changing higher education through brokerage. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Kang, E., Bianchini, J., & Kelly, G. (2013). Crossing the border from science student to science teacher: preservice teachers’ views and experiences learning to teach inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 427–447.
Kubiak, C., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Appleby, K., Kempster, M., Reed, M., Solvason, C., & Thorpe, M. (2014). Brokering boundary encounters. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 81–95). Abingdon: Routledge.
Oborn, E., & Dawson, S. (2010). Learning across communities of practice: an examination of multidisciplinary work. British Journal of Management, 21, 843–858.
Tatto, M., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., … Reckase, M. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: IEA.
Thornton, S. (2008). Speaking with different voices: knowledge legitimation codes of mathematicians and mathematics educators. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 523–529). Adelaide: MERGA.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Funding
This project was funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching (grant #MS13-3174). Following the cessation of the OLT in June 2016, the Australian Government Department of Education and Training continued to support the Enhancing the Training of Mathematics and Science Teachers program and projects. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching or Department of Education and Training.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goos, M., Bennison, A. Boundary crossing and brokering between disciplines in pre-service mathematics teacher education. Math Ed Res J 30, 255–275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0232-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0232-4