Abstract
Assessment for learning (AfL) is integral to teaching and learning, and has as its central foci (i) pedagogical intervention in the immediacy of student learning, and (ii) the students’ agency in the learning and assessment process. The role that students adopt in AfL is consistent with the idea of self-regulated learning, which involves students as metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally active agents in their own learning. Through an analysis of an extended sequence of classroom interaction for the purpose of obtaining evidence of learning, this paper demonstrates that self-regulation is supported through a temporary process of co-regulation between teacher and student in the context of AfL. Co-regulation is a construct derived from Vygotsky’s concept of socially mediated learning, and the neo-Vygotskian perspective on human learning as a culturally based communicative process, through which knowledge is shared and constructed. Specific features of co-regulation illustrated through the analyses presented in the paper are (i) goal orientation, a focus on the learning to be achieved; (ii) scaffolding, the assistance the teacher provides to achieve a goal that is currently beyond students’ unassisted efforts; (iii) intersubjectivity, a shared understanding based on a common focus of attention; (iv) the active construction of knowledge by students, rather than transference of knowledge from the teacher to the student; and (v) temporary support, provided through scaffolding and other external supports that students can ultimately appropriate as their own.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2018). Self-regulation in learning: The role of language and formative assessment. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York: Open University.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5, 7–73.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 21, 5–31.
Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 199–210.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. Mawah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Clark, H. H. (1992). Arenas language use. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (Eds.). (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-en.
Enfield, N. J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction (pp. 399–430). London: Berg.
Erickson, F. (2007). Some thoughts on “proximal” formative assessment of student learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 186–216.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
Goodwin, C. (2017). Cooperative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Culture and universals: Integrating social and cognitive development. In G. Saxe & E. Turiel (Eds.), Culture, Thought, and Development (pp. 231–277). Mawah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
Heritage, M. (2016). Assessment for Learning: Co-regulation in and as student-teacher interactions. In D. Laveault & V. L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. New York: Springer.
Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 176–190.
Maynard, D., & Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational exams. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2), 177–202.
Mercer, N. (2011). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. In B. Stierer & J. Maybin (Eds.), Language literacy and learning in educational practice: A reader (pp. 74–92). Clevedon, PA: Open University.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
Organisation of Economic Development and Cooperation. (2008). Assessment for learning: The case for formative assessment. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2014). Other-regulation in collaborative groups: Implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science, 42(6), 879–904.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1295–1345.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating AfL. Buckingham: Open University Press.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia, 46(1), 19–37.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, 2, 289–307.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heritage, M. Assessment for learning as support for student self-regulation. Aust. Educ. Res. 45, 51–63 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0261-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0261-3