In this work, the optimization for the optimum position of the secondary slat was investigated with an emphasis on enhancing the aerodynamic performance. The method adopted here merges the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) technique with the response surface method. The multi-objective genetic algorithm was used for the optimization of the positioning of the secondary slat, and the Pareto ranking was done using a non-dominated sorting method. In CFD analysis, the Reynolds average Nervier–Stokes equation is solved using the k-ω shear stress transport model which is very popular due to its accuracy. The obtained numerical result for the primary airfoil NACA 2415 and the airfoil with a single slat is validated with the experimental data. The NACA 22 airfoil profile is selected to serve as a slat to impediment the separation of boundary layer and enhance airfoil characteristics. The addition of slat at the leading edge of the primary slat increases the overall aerodynamic performance of the configuration and enhances the stall angle from 12º to 22º. Further, the addition of slat significantly reduces the boundary layer thickness as a result delays the separation to a higher angle of attack. The method used in this work can be employed as a valuable tool for positioning optimization of the secondary slat at the leading edge of the primary slat of the airfoil.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Genc, S.; Kayank, U.; Lock, G.D.: Flow over an airfoil without and with a leading edge slat at a transitional Reynolds number. J. Aerosp. Eng. Proc. IMechE 223, 217–231 (2009)
Prandtl I (1928) Motion of fluids with very little viscosity. NACA TN NO 452, Washington, DC.
Fatahian, E.; Lohrasbi Nichkoohi, A.; Salarian, H.; Khaleghinia, J.: Effects of the hinge position and suction on flow separation and aerodynamic performance of the NACA 0012 airfoil. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 86 (2020)
Weik FE, Platt RC, (1993) Wind tunnel tests on a model wing with flower flap and specially developed leading edge slot. NACA TN NO 459 Washington DC.
Kruger W (1947) Wind-Tunnel Investigation on a Changed Mustang Profile with Nose Flap Force and Pressure-Distribution measurements, NACA TN NO 1177. Washington, DC.
Yavuz T, Klks B, Akpnar H, Erol O (2011) Performance analysis of a hydro-foil with and without leading edge slat. In: 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications and Workshops Hawai, pp. 281–285.
Soderman PT (1972) Aerodynamic effects of leading-edge serrations on a two-dimensional airfoil, NASA Technical Note, NASA TM X-2643, A-3706
Yavuz, T.; Koc, E.; Kilkis, B.; Erol, O.; Balas, C.; Aydemir, T.: Performance analysis of the airfoil-slat arrangements for hydro and wind turbine application. Renew Energy 74, 414–421 (2015)
Choudhry, A.; Arjomandi, M.; Kelso, R.: A study of long separation bubble on thick airfoils and its consequent effects. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 52, 84–96 (2015)
Aftab, S.M.A.; Rafie, A.M.; Razak, N.A.; Ahmad, K.A.: Turbulence model selection for low Reynolds number flows. PLoS ONE 11(4), e0152755 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153755
Matyushenko, A.A.; Garbaruk, A.V.: Adjustment of the k-ω SST turbulence model for prediction of airfoil characteristics near stall. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 769, 012082 (2016)
Zhang, C.; Bounds, C.P.; Foster, L.; Uddin, M.: Turbulence modeling effects on the CFD predictions of flow over a detailed full-scale sedan vehicle. Fluids 4(3), 148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4030148
Siddiqui, N.A.; Chaab, M.A.: Effect of aspect ratio on the recirculation region of 35° Ahmed body. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2020.1842307
Besnard E, Schmitz A, Boscher E, Garcia N, Cebeci T (1998) Two-Dimensional Aircraft High Lift System Design and Optimization. 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 98–0123.
Jureczko, M.; Pawlak, M.; Mezyk, A.: A Optimisation of wind turbine blades. J. Mater Process Technol. 167, 463–471 (2005)
Burger C, Hartfield R, (2006) Wind turbine airfoil performance optimization using the vortex lattice method and a genetic algorithm. In: Proceeding of the 4th AIAA Energy Conversion Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 26–29 June.
Kenway G, Martins JRRA, (2008) Aerostructural shape optimization of wind turbine blades considering site-specific winds. In: Proceeding of the AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Victoria, BC, Canda, 10–12 Sept.
Li, J.Y.; Li, R.; Gao, Y.; Huang, J.: Aerodynamic optimization of wind turbine airfoils using response surface techniques. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 224, 827–838 (2010)
Ju, Y.P.; Zhang, C.H.: Multi-point robust design optimization of wind turbine airfoil under geometric uncertainty. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 226, 245–261 (2012)
Liang, C.; Li, H.: Effects of optimized airfoil on vertical axis wind turbine aerodynamic performance. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 88 (2018)
Reis, C.J.B.; Manzanares-Filho, N.; de Lima, A.M.G.: Robust optimization of aerodynamic loadings for airfoil inverse designs. J Braz Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 4, 207 (2019)
Box, G.E.P.: Darper NR. Empirical model building and response surfaces, John Wiley and Sons Inc New York USA (1978)
Box, G.E.P.; Wilson, K.B.: On the experimental attainment of optimum onditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 13, 1–45 (1951)
Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley. Reading, MA (1989)
Holland, J.: Adaptation in natural and artifical systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor MI (1975)
Singh, S.K.; Chowdhury, J.; Ghosh, S.; Kumar, P.K.; Debnath, K.: Kumar P (2019) Experimental and numerical investigation of flow characteristics in an open rectangular cavity. ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2019.1665482
Menter, F.R.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32(8), 1598–1605 (1994)
Montoya, M.C.; Nieto, F.; Alvarez, A.J.; Hernandez, S.; Jurado, J.A.: Numerical simulations of the aerodynamic response of circular segments with different corner angles by means of 2D URANS. Impact of turbulence modeling approaches. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 12(1), 750–779 (2018)
Igali, D.; Mukhmetov, O.; Zhao, Y.; Fok, S.C.; Teh, S.L.: Comparative analysis of turbulence models for automotive aerodynamic simulation and design. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 20(6), 1145–1152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-019-0107-7
Kumar, P.; Singh, S.K.: Flow past a bluff body subjected to lower subcritical Reynolds number. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 5, 173–179 (2020)
Eleni, D.C.; Athanasios, T.I.; Dionissios, M.P.: Evaluation of the Turbulence Models for the Simulation of the Flow over an Aerofoil. J Mech Eng Res 4(3), 100–111 (2012)
Sharma, A.; Kumar, P.; Singh, S.K.: Numerical analysis of flow structures behind the bluff body at different aspect ratio. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/402/1/012056.012056
Anderson Jr, J.D.: Fundamental of aerodynamics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, NY (1991)
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, K., Kumar, P. & Singh, S.K. Aerodynamic Performance Optimization of Multiple Slat Airfoil based on Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm. Arab J Sci Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05448-3
- Angle of attack
- Multiple slat