Introduction

The diversity in both the structure and function of glycans is perhaps unparalleled in biological systems. As individual molecules or as decoration on proteins and lipids, they play a vital role in a myriad of physiological processes and take an active part in the molecular choreography that represents life [1,2,3,4]. The paramount importance of glycans is not, however, reflected in the current state of the analytical tools available for their analysis. Techniques combining liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS) [5, 6], which allow for routine sequencing of proteins, have difficulties to provide rapid structural analysis of carbohydrates [7,8,9]. These difficulties arise from the many levels of isomerism that glycans possess [2]: (1) their monosaccharide constituents are often isomeric, differing only in the stereochemistry of a single carbon atom; (2) multiple OH groups of a single monosaccharide provide a variety of potential attachment points for the next subunit, resulting in isomers that differ in their linkage position as well as allowing the formation of branched structures; (3) the anomeric (C1) carbon where the glycosidic linkage is realized represents another stereocenter, which results in each glycosidic bond being in either α or β configuration. In addition, each glycan with a free reducing end OH will be present in solution in both its α and β anomeric form at ratios determined by the equilibrium of the mutarotation reaction that leads to their interconversion (Figure 1a) [10]. It is this immense isomeric heterogeneity throughout the glycome that represents a major bottleneck for the development of robust, structure-sensitive, high-throughput analytical techniques and workflows.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Mutarotation of the C1 carbon leads to an equilibrium between the α and β anomers of reducing carbohydrates in solution. (b) The carbohydrates’ reducing end is locked in α or β configuration when the respective hydroxy group is methylated

Ion-mobility spectrometry (IMS) [11, 12], which is based on the difference in size and shape of a molecular ion when it is subjected to collisions with an inert buffer gas, is potentially sensitive to all kinds of different isomers. First studies using IMS-MS methods to separate glycan isomers were promising [13, 14], and these have been followed by more systematic investigations [15] of the feasibility of this approach for routine glycan analysis. This included the use of IMS-MS/MS methods [16, 17], where structural information can be obtained by fragment analysis of mobility-separated precursor ions in analogy to established LC-MS/MS workflows. Despite its promise, IMS alone cannot identify the subtlest forms of glycan isomerism, such as the difference in stereochemistry of a single carbon atom in an oligosaccharide.

Infrared (IR) spectroscopy of gas-phase molecular ions, on the other hand, can be exquisitely sensitive to the smallest of structural details [18, 19]. Carbohydrates possess hydroxy groups, amines, and other substituents that can serve as structural probes because their frequencies will be highly characteristic of their local environment. A vibrational spectrum will therefore contain information about the structure-defining hydrogen-bonding network within each molecule. Aided by quantum-mechanical calculations, IR spectroscopy becomes the ideal method for precise structural analysis of smaller sugar molecules [20,21,22,23,24], with the size-limiting factor being the computational methods available on the one hand and increasingly congested experimental spectra as the molecules become larger on the other. Nevertheless, a vibrational spectrum will always represent a characteristic fingerprint for a given carbohydrate structure. This realization initiated a series of studies that explored the sensitivity of different spectroscopic schemes to the various forms of carbohydrate isomerism [25,26,27,28,29,30], with the idea that an unknown carbohydrate compound could be identified by comparing its fingerprint spectrum with those from a database, bringing spectroscopy closer to becoming a routine analysis tool.

Spectral congestion needs to be minimized for IR fingerprinting to be applicable as generically as possible. Considerably narrower bandwidths can be achieved when the number of populated vibrational states within the molecules is reduced by cooling them to low temperatures and applying, for example, messenger-tagging spectroscopic schemes [31,32,33,34], which yield linear absorption spectra. The applicability of cryogenic ion spectroscopy to carbohydrates has recently been demonstrated using both low-temperature ion traps [26, 27] and liquid helium droplets [25] to cool the ions. While decreasing the thermal internal energy distribution before spectral analysis is a prerequisite for resolved absorption bands, the isomeric heterogeneity of glycans will invariably result in the superposition of unique fingerprint spectra. In this case, the physical separation of isomers prior to spectroscopic investigation will greatly simplify the measured IR spectra and their analysis. Liquid chromatography is one of the most commonly applied techniques for carbohydrate isomer separation, but a mismatch in experimental time scales renders a combination of LC with gas-phase spectroscopic methods a challenging task. Nevertheless, this approach has been recently employed in a study of isomeric disaccharides using the stop-flow technique to extend the elution time of an LC-separated compound to that needed to acquire a room temperature IR multiple-photon dissociation spectrum [35].

The time scale of IMS-MS, on the other hand, is ideally suited for combination with spectroscopy, and the potential of IMS to resolve small differences in size of isomeric molecules prior to their spectral analysis makes this approach particularly appealing [36, 37]. We have previously demonstrated how orthogonal MS, IMS, and IR spectroscopic data of carbohydrates could serve as reference for identification of glycans from unknown samples and even from mixtures [27, 38]. We first used a drift tube IMS instrument coupled to a cryogenic ion trap to measure the collision cross-sections (CCS) of isomeric disaccharides prior to their spectroscopic analysis [26, 27]; however, it became evident that the IMS resolution provided by our 2-m drift tube would not be sufficient to resolve most of these species from a mixture. By variation of the charge state of the investigated glycans from protonated to deprotonated [39] or by using different metal ion adducts as charge carriers [40,41,42], it is possible to enhance IMS separation of specific glycan mixtures; however, a generally applicable method has not been established to date. Our approach to separate glycan isomers as completely as possible before spectroscopic interrogation employs a newly constructed instrument in which we combine ultrahigh-resolution IMS, using structures for lossless ion manipulation (SLIM) [43, 44], with a cryogenic ion trap and a time-of-flight (TOF) MS to allow messenger-tagging IR spectroscopy of CCS- and m/z-selected glycans [38, 45]. Using SLIM traveling wave ion mobility, we have achieved a resolution of over 500 by cycling ions multiple times through a serpentine path, providing an extended drift length not feasible with conventional IMS methods [46].

In this paper, we demonstrate the ability to resolve and identify α and β anomers of reducing glycans using the combination of high-resolution SLIM IMS and cryogenic IR spectroscopy. We use selective oxygen-18 isotopic substitution to identify the anomeric OH band in the IR spectrum and assign each anomer by comparison with the spectra of the corresponding anomerically pure methylated species. While the identification of carbohydrate anomers can be achieved by other techniques, such as NMR [47], our ability to separate and identify such species in a mass spectrometer on a millisecond time scale is particularly significant in view of the recent evidence for retention of anomericity of a glycosidic bond upon collision-induced dissociation (CID) [28]. Application of an IMS-MS-MS-IR spectroscopic workflow to the Cn fragments of glycans should be able to verify under which conditions such anomeric retention occurs. This could then be incorporated into a CID-based sequencing scheme to determine the stereochemistry of glycosidic linkages.

Materials and Methods

Samples

Samples were purchased from Dextra (UK) or Carbosynth (UK) and used without further purification. Solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. For electrospray ionization, samples were dissolved in water/methanol (v/v 50/50) to yield a final concentration of 50–100 μM. To enhance the abundance of the here-investigated sodiated species, we added 1.5 equivalents of NaCl to the solution. Oxygen-18 isotope labeling of disaccharides was achieved by dissolving samples in H218O and incubating them at room temperature for 3 days. It is known that only the anomeric OH at the reducing end exchanges under these conditions [48].

Ion-Mobility-Selective IR Spectroscopy

We use traveling wave (TW) ion mobility implemented with structures for lossless ion manipulation (SLIM), developed by Smith and coworkers [43, 44], where the TW potentials created between a mirrored pair of printed circuit boards (15 × 15 cm in size) propel ions through a cyclic serpentine path (1.8-m single pass) to achieve high mobility resolution. The number of cycles n can be varied using an electrostatic switch [46]. A schematic of our instrument is shown in Figure 2a, and a detailed description can be found elsewhere [38].

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Schematic of the IMS-MS-IR spectroscopy instrument that uses structures for lossless ion manipulation (SLIM) for ultrahigh-resolution ion-mobility separation prior IR spectroscopic analysis in a planar, cryogenic trap. (b) The instrument’s IMS resolution as a function of the number of separation cycles, n, determined for the peptides GRGDS2+ and SDGRG2+

Briefly, ions are electrosprayed using commercial nano-emitters (Thermo Fisher) and transferred into the instrument through a capillary. A dual-stage ion funnel assembly [49] collimates and stores ions in the hourglass section of the second funnel before pulses of ions, 120 μs in duration, are released into the ion-mobility region, where different species are separated based on their CCS. An example of the instrument’s resolution is displayed in Figure 2b, where the separation and peak widths of the peptide ions GRGDS2+ and SDGRG2+ were investigated as a function of separation cycles n. The resulting curve follows the expected n1/2 dependency [50] and reaches a resolution of approximately 500 at n = 28 cycles.

After separation by their drift time, ions are ejected from the SLIM board, pass through a mass-resolving quadrupole, and sent to the cryogenic ion trap, which is held at a temperature of 40 K. Collisions with the cold buffer gas (10% N2 in He) lead to cooling and formation of nitrogen-tagged ions, allowing the application of messenger-tagging spectroscopy [31,32,33,34]. A single laser pulse (10 mJ) from an infrared optical parametric oscillator (OPO) irradiates the trapped ions before they are pulsed into the TOF region for the m/z analysis. An IR spectrum is obtained by monitoring the wavelength-dependent dissociation yield of the nitrogen-tagged molecular ions. A single laser scan in the wavelength range reported here requires 6–8 min, and the spectra represent the average of two such scans.

Results and Discussion

IMS of Glycans

In analogy to bimodal distributions in LC chromatograms that are often reported for glycans, ion mobility arrival time distributions (ATDs) can also exhibit multiple features that were speculated to originate from the respective α and β anomers [30, 45, 51, 52]; however, identification of the two anomeric forms has remained elusive. In the present study, we investigated a set of roughly 20 different sodiated glycans ranging from small mono- and disaccharides to larger oligosaccharides using our ultrahigh-resolution IMS instrument; a subset of which is displayed in Figure 3a. Most interestingly, all investigated glycans with a free reducing end OH exhibit two features in their ATD. For the three disaccharides displayed here, seven separation cycles were necessary to resolve these different species, whereas nine cycles were required to resolve two different features of glucose (top panel). Other disaccharides and larger oligosaccharides require a different number of separation cycles in the SLIM section (i.e., different IMS resolution) to separate two features (see Fig. S1 in the Supporting Information SI).

Figure 3
figure 3

IMS arrival time distributions of reducing (a) and non-reducing glycans (b) at high IMS resolving power settings. The label n indicates the number of IMS cycles employed for separation. The structure of glycans is shown using the CFG nomenclature

Conversely, when the hydroxy group at the reducing end of a glycan is methylated, we observe only one peak in the ATD, even at the higher resolving power reached after 20 separation cycles (Figure 3b). The absence of a second species can be interpreted by the locking of the reducing end C1 atom upon methylation, blocking the mutarotation process that is responsible for coexisting α and β anomers in solution (Figure 1b). Table sugar (sucrose) is also unable to form anomers, since the disaccharide is formed by C1–C1 α-β glycosidic linkage of fucose and glucose and, consequently, has no free reducing end hydroxy group. Its ATD in the bottom panel of Figure 3b shows only a single feature after 13 cycles, corresponding to an IMS resolution of approximately 300. In light of the observation that glycans with a free OH at the reducing end always seem to exhibit two peaks in their ATD, we used cryogenic ion spectroscopy to identify these species.

Spectroscopic Identification of Anomers

The two mobility-separated species of sodiated GalNAc-α-(1-3)-Gal (labeled A and B in the ATD in Figure 3a) were selected by electrostatic deflection and loaded separately into the cryogenic trap where their infrared (IR) spectrum is measured. The results are displayed in Figure 4b and e for species A and B, respectively. Signals in the wavenumber range below 3550 cm−1 can be attributed to strongly hydrogen-bonded OH and NH oscillators, while relatively free OH vibrations are expected to occur from 3600 cm−1 and above [20].

Figure 4
figure 4

IR spectra of mobility-selected species A and B of sodiated GalNAc-α(1-3)-Gal ((b) and (e)) and their C1-18OH-labeled equivalents ((a) and (f)) and the corresponding C1–O-methylated species with the C1 locked in α (c) or in β (d) configuration. The C1–OH stretch vibration at 3655 cm−1 is clearly identified by the 18O labeling experiment

The high sensitivity of IR spectroscopy to smallest structural details is reflected in these spectra. While most absorption bands appear at the same wavenumber with almost identical relative intensities between the spectra of the two drift peaks, other signals, such as the band around 3600 cm−1 for species A and the broader absorption at 3630 cm−1 for species B, are clearly characteristic of each structure. We expect a total of eight OH and NH oscillators for these molecules, which coincides with the number of resolved absorption bands in the spectrum of A. In the spectrum of B, there appear to be only 7 bands, but the broad absorption signal around 3630 cm−1 appears to be unresolved in this spectrum.

Proving the hypothesis that the two mobility-separated glycan species represent the α and β anomers requires a deeper analysis of the IR spectra. The band corresponding to the anomeric C1–OH oscillator can be identified using oxygen-18 isotopic labeling, which should induce a spectral redshift. Indeed, a redshift of 12 cm−1 corresponding to the change in reduced mass of the respective O–H oscillator can be observed for the absorption band at 3655 cm−1 as the only noticeable change when comparing spectra A and B with those of their C1-18O labeled analogs A′ and B′ in Figure 4a and f, respectively. We thus identify the band at 3655 cm−1 in the spectrum of both mobility-separated species as that from the anomeric OH.

Infrared spectra of the C1-methylated species of the same glycan with the C1 configuration locked in its α and β position are shown in Figure 4c and d, respectively. Most noticeably, the absorption band at 3655 cm−1 attributed to the C1–OH oscillator of the unsubstituted species is absent in these spectra, which is a direct result of the C1–O–CH3 substitution. Moreover, the spectra of the methylated species resemble those of the corresponding unsubstituted species in the position and relative intensities of the remaining absorption bands. It is particularly striking that for each one of the two mobility-separated, unsubstituted species, its spectrum matches that of one of the methylated molecules to within a few cm−1. This leads to the conclusion that species A represents the α anomer and species B represents the β anomer of GalNAc-α(1-3)-Gal. The same strategy to identify mobility-separated glycan anomers was applied to two additional disaccharides with similar results (see Fig. S2 and S3 in the Supporting Information).

Monitoring of Glucose Mutarotation

To further substantiate our ability to separate glycan anomers on a sub-second time scale, we have used it to monitor the mutarotation process in glucose. When a sample of freshly prepared, anomerically pure α-d-glucose is injected into our instrument, we observe a single IMS feature for singly sodiated ions after nine separation cycles (Figure 5a, bottom).

Figure 5
figure 5

(a) ATDs of a sample of α-d-glucose at different times after sample preparation after n = 9 separation cycles. (b) Relative ratios of the drift signals corresponding to the α and β anomers as a function of time after sample preparation and the fit function f(t) according to Eq. S4 in the supporting information

After several minutes, a second feature at earlier drift times continues to increase in intensity until equilibrium in relative signal intensities is reached after several hours (Figure 5a, other traces). Given that α-d-glucose will form its β anomer in an equilibrium reaction on the observed time scales, it is likely that the two observed mobility-separated species represent these α and β anomers, and an IR spectroscopic analysis of the two species separately and comparison of the resulting spectra to published reference spectra [20] confirms this assumption (Fig. S4, supporting information).

The IMS separation technique can thus be used to determine rate constants for the dynamic conversion reaction α-d-glucose \( {\rightleftharpoons}_{k_{\beta}}^{k_{\alpha }} \) β-d-glucose by simply monitoring the formation of the β species in real time. The ratio β/(β+α) of the relative intensities of the two signals in the ATD is plotted in Figure 5b as a function of time after sample preparation. The conversion can be treated as a first-order reaction [53, 54], and the resulting differential rate equation describing the concentration of the β species can be solved analytically by a function of the form f(t) = A − Aekt, with the observable reaction rate k = kα + kβ. This function is represented by the solid red curve in Figure 5b using A and k as fit parameters, which can then be used to obtain the rate constants kα and kβ (for details see supporting information) [53]. At the temperature and solvent conditions used here (25 °C, MeOH/H2O 50/50), we determined kα = 0.88 × 10−4 s−1 and kβ = 1.13 × 10−4 s−1, in agreement with previously published values [53, 55].

Conclusions

We demonstrate the power of a combined ultrahigh-resolution IMS and cryogenic IR spectroscopic approach to separate and identify glycan anomers of the reducing end. Cyclic IMS, which we realize using structures for lossless ion manipulation (SLIM), provides the necessary resolving power to distinguish two drift features of every mono- and disaccharide with a free reducing end investigated in our laboratory to date. The addition of an IR spectroscopic dimension allows us to probe the intramolecular hydrogen bonding network of the m/z- and mobility-selected glycan species and is used here to identify the α and β anomers. These results highlight the benefit of ultrahigh-resolution IMS as a tool for rapid separation of different glycan structures on the one hand and illustrate the exquisite sensitivity of high-resolution vibrational spectroscopy to smallest structural differences on the other. The ability to separate and identify glycan anomers in the gas phase is particularly significant for studying the retention of anomericity of a glycosidic bond upon collision-induced dissociation (CID) [28, 56] or enzymatic degradation [56]. Application of an IMS-MS-MS-IR spectroscopic workflow to the Cn fragments of glycans should be able to verify under what conditions such anomeric retention occurs. This could then be incorporated into a CID-based sequencing scheme to determine the stereochemistry of glycosidic linkages, which is particularly important in carbohydrate research.