Comparison of Collisional and Electron-Based Dissociation Modes for Middle-Down Analysis of Multiply Glycosylated Peptides

Focus: Mass Spectrometry in Glycobiology and Related Fields: Research Article

Abstract

Analysis of singly glycosylated peptides has evolved to a point where large-scale LC-MS analyses can be performed at almost the same scale as proteomics experiments. While collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) remains the mainstay of bottom-up analyses, it performs poorly for the middle-down analysis of multiply glycosylated peptides. With improvements in instrumentation, electron-activated dissociation (ExD) modes are becoming increasingly prevalent for proteomics experiments and for the analysis of fragile modifications such as glycosylation. While these methods have been applied for glycopeptide analysis in isolated studies, an organized effort to compare their efficiencies, particularly for analysis of multiply glycosylated peptides (termed here middle-down glycoproteomics), has not been made. We therefore compared the performance of different ExD modes for middle-down glycopeptide analyses. We identified key features among the different dissociation modes and show that increased electron energy and supplemental activation provide the most useful data for middle-down glycopeptide analysis.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Tandem MS Glycoproteomics Middle-down Electron-activated dissociation hotECD EThcD FTICR-MS 

Supplementary material

13361_2018_1909_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.3 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 2402 kb)
13361_2018_1909_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (953 kb)
ESM 2 (XLSX 952 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Håkansson, K., Cooper, H.J., Emmett, M.R., Costello, C.E., Marshall, A.G., Nilsson, C.L.: Electron capture dissociation and infrared multiphoton dissociation MS/MS of an N-glycosylated tryptic peptide to yield complementary sequence information. Anal. Chem. 73, 4530–4536 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manri, N., Satake, H., Kaneko, A., Hirabayashi, A., Baba, T., Sakamoto, T.: Glycopeptide identification using liquid-chromatography-compatible hot electron capture dissociation in a radio-frequency-quadrupole ion trap. Anal. Chem. 85, 2056–2063 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Renfrow, M.B., Mackay, C.L., Chalmers, M.J., Julian, B.A., Mestecky, J., Kilian, M., Poulsen, K., Emmett, M.R., Marshall, A.G., Novak, J.: Analysis of O-glycan heterogeneity in IgA1 myeloma proteins by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: implications for IgA nephropathy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389, 1397–1407 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pu, Y., Ridgeway, M.E., Glaskin, R.S., Park, M.A., Costello, C.E., Lin, C.: Separation and identification of isomeric Glycans by selected accumulation-trapped ion mobility spectrometry-electron activated dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 3440–3443 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Huang, Y., Costello, C.E., Lin, C.: Detailed glycan structural characterization by electronic excitation dissociation. Anal. Chem. 85, 10017–10021 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khatri, K., Staples, G.O., Leymarie, N., Leon, D.R., Turiák, L., Huang, Y., Yip, S., Hu, H., Heckendorf, C.F., Zaia, J.: Confident assignment of site-specific glycosylation in complex glycoproteins in a single step. J. Proteome Res. 13, 4347–4355 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khatri, K., Klein, J. A., White, M. R., Grant, O. C., Leymarie, N., Woods, R. J., Hartshorn, K. L., and Zaia, J.: Integrated omics and computational glycobiology reveal structural basis for Influenza A virus glycan microheterogeneity and host interactions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 15, 1895–1912 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khatri, K., Klein, J.A., Zaia, J.: Use of an informed search space maximizes confidence of site-specific assignment of glycoprotein glycosylation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 409, 607–618 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fornelli, L., Ayoub, D., Aizikov, K., Beck, A., Tsybin, Y.O.: Middle-down analysis of monoclonal antibodies with electron transfer dissociation orbitrap fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 86, 3005–3012 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cannon, J., Lohnes, K., Wynne, C., Wang, Y., Edwards, N., Fenselau, C.: High-throughput middle-down analysis using an orbitrap. J. Proteome Res. 9, 3886–3890 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh, C., Zampronio, C.G., Creese, A.J., Cooper, H.J.: Higher energy collision dissociation (HCD) product ion-triggered electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry for the analysis of N-linked glycoproteins. J. Proteome Res. 11, 4517–4525 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alley, W.R., Mechref, Y., Novotny, M.V.: Characterization of glycopeptides by combining collision-induced dissociation and electron-transfer dissociation mass spectrometry data. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 23, 161–170 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mirgorodskaya, E., Roepstorff, P., Zubarev, R.A.: Localization of O-glycosylation sites in peptides by electron capture dissociation in a Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 71, 4431–4436 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catalina, M.I., Koeleman, C.A.M., Deelder, A.M., Wuhrer, M.: Electron transfer dissociation of N-glycopeptides: loss of the entire N-glycosylated asparagine side chain. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 21, 1053–1061 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seipert, R.R., Dodds, E.D., Clowers, B.H., Beecroft, S.M., German, J.B., Lebrilla, C.B.: Factors that influence fragmentation behavior of N-linked glycopeptide ions. Anal. Chem. 80, 3684–3692 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saba, J., Dutta, S., Hemenway, E., Viner, R.: Increasing the productivity of glycopeptides analysis by using higher-energy collision dissociation-accurate mass-product-dependent electron transfer dissociation. Int. J. Proteomics. 2012, e560391 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snovida, S.I., Bodnar, E.D., Viner, R., Saba, J., Perreault, H.: A simple cellulose column procedure for selective enrichment of glycopeptides and characterization by nano LC coupled with electron-transfer and high-energy collisional-dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Carbohydr. Res. 345, 792–801 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desaire, H.: Glycopeptide analysis, recent developments and applications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 12, 893–901 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desaire, H., Hua, D.: When can glycopeptides be assigned based solely on high-resolution mass spectrometry data? Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 287, 21–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thaysen-Andersen, M., Packer, N.H.: Advances in LC–MS/MS-based glycoproteomics: getting closer to system-wide site-specific mapping of the N- and O-glycoproteome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Proteins Proteomics. 1844, 1437–1452 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manri, N., Takegawa, Y., Fujitani, N., Kaneko, A., Hirabayashi, A., Nishimura, S.-I., Sakamoto, T.: Determination of O-glycosylation heterogeneity using a mass-spectrometric method retaining sugar modifications. Anal. Sci. Int. J. Jpn. Soc. Anal. Chem. 28, 723–727 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Syka, J.E.P., Coon, J.J., Schroeder, M.J., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D.F.: Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 9528–9533 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frese, C.K., Zhou, H., Taus, T., Altelaar, A.F.M., Mechtler, K., Heck, A.J.R., Mohammed, S.: Unambiguous phosphosite localization using electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD). J. Proteome Res. 12, 1520–1525 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, F., van Breukelen, B., Heck, A.J.R.: Facilitating protein disulfide mapping by a combination of pepsin digestion, electron transfer higher energy dissociation (EThcD), and a dedicated search algorithm SlinkS. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 13, 2776–2786 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goloborodko, A.A., Levitsky, L.I., Ivanov, M.V., Gorshkov, M.V.: Pyteomics—a python framework for exploratory data analysis and rapid software prototyping in proteomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 24, 301–304 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein, J. A., Khatri, K., Carvalho, L., Zaia, J.: In: Glycobiology. pp 1458–1458, New Orleans, LA (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ranzinger, R., Herget, S., von der Lieth, C.-W., Frank, M.: GlycomeDB—a unified database for carbohydrate structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D373–D376 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ranzinger, R., Herget, S., Wetter, T., von der Lieth, C.-W.: GlycomeDB—integration of open-access carbohydrate structure databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 9, 384 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koster, C., Holle, A.: A new intelligent annotation procedure: SNAP. In: Proceedings of the 47th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Dallas, 13–17 June 1999Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jhingree, J.R., Beveridge, R., Dickinson, E.R., Williams, J.P., Brown, J.M., Bellina, B., Barran, P.E.: Electron transfer with no dissociation ion mobility–mass spectrometry (ETnoD IM-MS). The effect of charge reduction on protein conformation. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 413, 43–51 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gunawardena, H.P., He, M., Chrisman, P.A., Pitteri, S.J., Hogan, J.M., Hodges, B.D.M., McLuckey, S.A.: Electron transfer versus proton transfer in gas-phase ion/ion reactions of polyprotonated peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 12627–12639 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cooper, H.J.: Investigation of the presence of b ions in electron capture dissociation mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 16, 1932–1940 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anusiewicz, I., Berdys-Kochanska, J., Simons, J.: Electron attachment step in electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD). J. Phys. Chem. A. 109, 5801–5813 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Asakawa, D., De Pauw, E.: Difference of electron capture and transfer dissociation mass spectrometry on Ni2+-, Cu2+-, and Zn2+-polyhistidine complexes in the absence of remote protons. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 27, 1165–1175 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Swaney, D.L., McAlister, G.C., Wirtala, M., Schwartz, J.C., Syka, J.E.P., Coon, J.J.: Supplemental activation method for high-efficiency electron-transfer dissociation of doubly protonated peptide precursors. Anal. Chem. 79, 477–485 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chan, W.Y.K., Chan, T.W.D., O’Connor, P.B.: Electron transfer dissociation with supplemental activation to differentiate aspartic and isoaspartic residues in doubly charged peptide cations. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21, 1012–1015 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bourgoin-Voillard, S., Leymarie, N., Costello, C.E.: Top-down tandem mass spectrometry on RNase A and B using a Qh/FT-ICR hybrid mass spectrometer. Proteomics. 14, 1174–1184 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shaw, J.B., Li, W., Holden, D.D., Zhang, Y., Griep-Raming, J., Fellers, R.T., Early, B.P., Thomas, P.M., Kelleher, N.L., Brodbelt, J.S.: Complete protein characterization using top-down mass spectrometry and ultraviolet photodissociation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12646–12651 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Treuheit, M.J., Costello, C.E., Halsall, H.B.: Analysis of the five glycosylation sites of human alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Biochem. J. 283, 105–112 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee, J.Y., Lee, H.K., Park, G.W., Hwang, H., Jeong, H.K., Yun, K.N., Ji, E.S., Kim, K.H., Kim, J.S., Kim, J.W., Yun, S.H., Choi, C.-W., Kim, S.I., Lim, J.-S., Jeong, S.-K., Paik, Y.-K., Lee, S.-Y., Park, J., Kim, S.Y., Choi, Y.-J., Kim, Y.-I., Seo, J., Cho, J.-Y., Oh, M.J., Seo, N., An, H.J., Kim, J.Y., Yoo, J.S.: Characterization of site-specific N-glycopeptide isoforms of α-1-acid glycoprotein from an Interlaboratory study using LC–MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 15, 4146–4164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ongay, S., Neusüss, C.: Isoform differentiation of intact AGP from human serum by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 398, 845–855 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    An, Y., Cipollo, J.F.: An unbiased approach for analysis of protein glycosylation and application to influenza vaccine hemagglutinin. Anal. Biochem. 415, 67–80 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    An, Y., Rininger, J.A., Jarvis, D.L., Jing, X., Ye, Z., Aumiller, J.J., Eichelberger, M., Cipollo, J.F.: Comparative glycomics analysis of influenza hemagglutinin (H5N1) produced in vaccine relevant cell platforms. J. Proteome Res. 12, 3707–3720 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Imre, T., Schlosser, G., Pocsfalvi, G., Siciliano, R., Molnár-Szöllősi, É., Kremmer, T., Malorni, A., Vékey, K.: Glycosylation site analysis of human alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) by capillary liquid chromatography—electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 40, 1472–1483 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McAlister, G.C., Russell, J.D., Rumachik, N.G., Hebert, A.S., Syka, J.E.P., Geer, L.Y., Westphall, M.S., Pagliarini, D.J., Coon, J.J.: Analysis of the acidic proteome with negative electron-transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 84, 2875–2882 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Riley, N.M., Rush, M.J., Rose, C.M., Richards, A.L., Kwiecien, N.W., Bailey, D.J., Hebert, A.S., Westphall, M.S., Coon, J.J.: The negative mode proteome with activated ion negative electron transfer dissociation (AI-NETD). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14(10), 2644–2660 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brodbelt, J.S.: Photodissociation mass spectrometry: new tools for characterization of biological molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2757–2783 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Madsen, J.A., Ko, B.J., Xu, H., Iwashkiw, J.A., Robotham, S.A., Shaw, J.B., Feldman, M.F., Brodbelt, J.S.: Concurrent automated sequencing of the glycan and peptide portions of O-linked glycopeptide anions by ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 85, 9253–9261 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wongkongkathep, P., Li, H., Zhang, X., Ogorzalek Loo, R.R., Julian, R.R., Loo, J.A.: Enhancing protein disulfide bond cleavage by UV excitation and electron capture dissociation for top-down mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 390, 137–145 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang, L., Reilly, J.P.: Extracting both peptide sequence and glycan structural information by 157 nm photodissociation of N-linked glycopeptides. J. Proteome Res. 8, 734–742 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Riley, N.M., Hebert, A.S., Westphall, M.S., Coon, J.J.: Thousands of glycosites characterized via intact glycopeptide analysis using activated ionelectron transfer dissociation. In: Proceedings of the 65th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Indianapolis, 4–8 June 2017Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Voinov, V.G., Bennett, S.E., Beckman, J.S., Barofsky, D.F.: ECD of tyrosine phosphorylation in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with a radio-frequency-free electromagnetostatic cell. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 1730–1738 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Voinov, V.G., Deinzer, M.L., Beckman, J.S., Barofsky, D.F.: Electron capture, collision-induced, and electron capture-collision induced dissociation in Q-TOF. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22, 607–611 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Voinov, V.G., Hoffman, P.D., Bennett, S.E., Beckman, J.S., Barofsky, D.F.: Electron capture dissociation of sodium-adducted peptides on a modified quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 26, 2096–2104 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Creese, A.J., Cooper, H.J.: Separation and identification of isomeric glycopeptides by high field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 84, 2597–2601 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Glaskin, R.S., Khatri, K., Wang, Q., Zaia, J., Costello, C.E.: Construction of a database of collision cross section values for glycopeptides, glycans, and peptides determined by IM-MS. Anal. Chem. 89, 4452–4460 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Glaskin, R.S., Newton, K., Kurulugama, R.T., Stafford, G.C., Voinov, V.G., Beckman, J.S., Barofsky, D.F., Costello, C.E.: Ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer modified for electron capture dissociation of glycans, glycoconjugates, peptides, and proteins. In: Proceedings of the 64th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, San Antonio, 5–9 June 2016Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Costello, C.E., Glaskin, R.S., Voinov, V.G., Lin, C., Pu, Y., Beckman, J.S., Tang, Y., Barofsky, D.F.: Applications of ion mobility separation with electron-based dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Mass Spectrometry Conference, Toronto, 20–26 August 2016Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    He, L., Anderson, L.C., Barnidge, D.R., Murray, D.L., Hendrickson, C.L., Marshall, A.G.: Analysis of monoclonal antibodies in human serum as a model for clinical monoclonal gammopathy by use of 21 tesla FT-ICR top-down and middle-down MS/MS. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 827–838 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry, Center for Biomedical Mass SpectrometryBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Program in BioinformaticsBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.Boston University Medical CampusBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations