Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes

  • Animal Genetics • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive ability of SNP-BLUP model using different pseudo-phenotypes such as phenotype adjusted for fixed effects, estimated breeding value, and genomic estimated breeding value, using simulated and real data for beef FA profile of Nelore cattle finished in feedlot. A pedigree with phenotypes and genotypes of 10,000 animals were simulated, considering 50% of multiple sires in the pedigree. Regarding to phenotypes, two traits were simulated, one with high heritability (0.58), another with low heritability (0.13). Ten replicates were performed for each trait and results were averaged among replicates. A historical population was created from generation zero to 2020, with a constant size of 2000 animals (from generation zero to 1000) to produce different levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Therefore, there was a gradual reduction in the number of animals (from 2000 to 600), producing a “bottleneck effect” and consequently, genetic drift and LD starting in the generation 1001 to 2020. A total of 335,000 markers (with MAF greater or equal to 0.02) and 1000 QTL were randomly selected from the last generation of the historical population to generate genotypic data for the test population. The phenotypes were computed as the sum of the QTL effects and an error term sampled from a normal distribution with zero mean and variance equal to 0.88. For simulated data, 4000 animals of the generations 7, 8, and 9 (with genotype and phenotype) were used as training population, and 1000 animals of the last generation (10) were used as validation population. A total of 937 Nelore bulls with phenotype for fatty acid profiles (Sum of saturated, monounsaturated, omega 3, omega 6, ratio of polyunsaturated and saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid profile) were genotyped using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 777,962 SNP. To compare the accuracy and bias of direct genomic value (DGV) for different pseudo-phenotypes, the correlation between true breeding value (TBV) or DGV with pseudo-phenotypes and linear regression coefficient of the pseudo-phenotypes on TBV for simulated data or DGV for real data, respectively. For simulated data, the correlations between DGV and TBV for high heritability traits were higher than obtained with low heritability traits. For simulated and real data, the prediction ability was higher for GEBV than for Yc and EBV. For simulated data, the regression coefficient estimates (b(Yc,DGV)), were on average lower than 1 for high and low heritability traits, being inflated. The results were more biased for Yc and EBV than for GEBV. For real data, the GEBV displayed less biased results compared to Yc and EBV for SFA, MUFA, n-3, n-6, and PUFA/SFA. Despite the less biased results for PUFA using the EBV as pseudo-phenotype, the b(Yi,DGV estimates obtained for the different pseudo-phenotypes (Yc, EBV and GEBV) were very close. Genomic information can assist in improving beef fatty acid profile in Zebu cattle, since the use of genomic information yielded genomic values for fatty acid profile with accuracies ranging from low to moderate. Considering both simulated and real data, the ssGBLUP model is an appropriate alternative to obtain more reliable and less biased GEBVs as pseudo-phenotype in situations of missing pedigree, due to high proportion of multiple sires, being more adequate than EBV and Yc to predict direct genomic value for beef fatty acid profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ (2010) Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 93:743–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry DP, Garcia JF, Garrick DJ (2016) Development and implementation of genomic predictions in beef cattle. Anim Front 6:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binnie MA, Barlow K, Johnson V, Harrison C (2014) Red meats: time for a paradigm shift in dietary advice. Meat Sci 98:445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddhireddy P, Kelly MJ, Northcutt S, Prayaga KC, Rumph J, Nise S (2014) Genomic predictions in Angus cattle: comparisons of sample size, response variables, and clustering methods for cross-validation. J Anim Sci 92:485–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brito FV, Neto JB, Sargolzaei M, Cobuci JA, Schenkel FS (2011) Accuracy of genomic selection in simulated populations mimicking the extent of linkage disequilibrium in beef cattle. BMC Genet 12:80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaia HLJ, Peripoli E, Silva RMO, Aboujaoude C, Feitosa FLB, Lemos MVA, Berton MP, Olivieri BF, Espigolan R, Tonussi R, Gordo DGM, Bresolin T, Magalhães AFB, Júnior FGA, Albuquerque LG, Oliveira HN, Furlan JJM, Ferrinho AM, Mueller LF, Tonhati H, Pereira ASC, Baldi F (2017) Genomic prediction for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle. Meat Sci 128:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL, Pong-Wong R, De Los Campos G, Hickey JM (2013) Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking. Genetics 193:347–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitosa FLB, Olivieri BF, Aboujaoude C, Pereira ASC, Lemos MVA, Chiaia HLJ, Berton MP, Peripolli E, Ferrrinho AM, Mueller LF, Mazalli MR, Albuquerque LG, Oliveira HN, Tonhati H, Espigolan R, Tonussi R, Silva RMO, Gordo DGM, Magalhães AFB, Aguilar I, Baldi F (2017) Genetic correlation estimates between beef fatty acid profile with meat and carcass traits in Nelore cattle finished in feedlot. J Appl Genet 58(1):123–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GHA (1957) Simple method for the isolation and purification of lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:497–509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick DJ (2011) The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States. Genet Sel Evol 43(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL (2009) Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol 41:55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes B, Goddard ME (2001) The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol 33:209–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Ascherio A, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH, Willett WC (1999) Dietary saturated fats and their food sources in relation to the risk of coronary heart disease in women. Am J Clin Nutr 70:1001–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Júnior GAF, Rosa GJ, Valente BD, Carvalheiro R, Baldi F, Garcia DA, Gordo DGM, Espigolan R, Takada L, Tonussi RL, Andrade WB, Magalhães AFB, Chardulo LAL, Tonhati H, Albuquerque LG (2016) Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nelore cattle. Genet Sel Evol 48:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katan MB, Zock PL, Mensink RP (1994) Effects of fats and fatty acids on blood lipids in humans: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr 60(6):1017S–1022S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer JKG, Fellner V, Dugan MER, Sauer FD, Mossoba MM, Yurawecz MP (1997) Evaluating acid and base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis on conjugated dienes and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32:1219–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legarra A (2014) Bases for genomic prediction. Course on genomic selection. v0.9. 1-75. http://snp.toulouse.inra.fr/~alegarra/. Accessed 4 Feb 2015

  • Legarra A, Granié C, Manfredi E, Elsen JM (2008) Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I (2009) A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92:4656–4663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legarra A, Ricard A, Filangi O (2013) GS3: genomic selection, Gibbs Sampling, Gauss-Seidel (and BayesCπ). http://snp.toulouse.inra.fr/~alegarra/. Accessed 3 Feb 2015

  • Lemos MV, Chiaia HLJ, Berton MP, Feitosa FL, Aboujaoud C, Camargo GM, Pereira ASC, Albuquerque LG, Ferrinho AM, Mueller LF, Mazalli MR, Furlan JJM, Carvalheiro R, Gordo DM, Tonussi R, Espigolan R, Silva RMO, Oliveira HN, Duckett S, Aguilar I, Baldi F (2016) Genome-wide association between single nucleotide polymorphisms with beef fatty acid profile in Nellore cattle using the single step procedure. BMC Genomics 17(1):213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee AJ, McSorley EM, Cuskelly GJ, Moss BW, Wallace JM, Bonham MP, Fearon AM (2010) Red meat consumption: an overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Sci 84:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morota G, Boddhireddy P, Vukasinovic N, Gianola D, Denise S (2014) Kernel-based variance component estimation and whole-genome prediction of pre-corrected phenotypes and progeny tests for dairy cow health traits. Front Genet 5:56

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz P, Resende M, Peter G, Huber D, Kirst M, Quesada T (2011) Effect of BLUP prediction on genomic selection: practical considerations to achieve greater accuracy in genomic selection. BMC Proc 5:49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neves HH, Carvalheiro R, O’brien AMP, Utsunomiya YT, Do Carmo AS, Schenkel FS, Sölkner J, McEwan JC, Van Tassell CP, Cole JB, Da Silva MV, Queiroz SA, Sonstegard TS, Garcia JF (2014) Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nelore) cattle. Genet Sel Evol 46:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saatchi M, Garrick DJ, Tait RG, Mayes MS, Drewnoski M, Schoonmaker J, Diaz C, Beitz DC, Reecy JM (2013) Genome-wide association and prediction of direct genomic breeding values for composition of fatty acids in Angus beef cattle. BMC Genomics 14:730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS (2009) QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock. Bioinformatics 25:680–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva RMO, Fragomeni BO, Lourenco DAL, Magalhães AFB, Irano N, Carvalheiro R, Canesin RC, Mercadante MEZ, Boligon AA, Baldi FS, Misztal I, Albuquerque LG (2016) Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population. J Anim Sci 94:3613–3623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snelling WM, Chiu R, Schein JE, Hobbs M, Abbey CA, Adelson DL, Aerts J, Bennett GL et al (2007) A physical map of the bovine genome. Genome Biol 8:165. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r165 Accessed 7 Feb 2015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonussi RL, Silva RM, Magalhães AFB, Espigolan R, Peripolli E, Olivieri BF, Feitosa FLB, Lemos MVA, Berton MP, Chiaia HLJ, Pereira ASC, Lôbo RB, Bezerra LA, Magnabosco CU, Lourenco D, Aguilar I, Baldi F (2017) Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data. PLoS One 12(9):e0181752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic preditions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414–4423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM, Cooper TA (2011) The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. J Dairy Sci 94:3202–3211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) with grant numbers (#2011/2141-0 and #2009/16118-5). HLJ Chiaia, MP Berton, S Kluska, and BF Olivieri received scholarships from the Coordination Office for Advancement of University-level Personnel (CAPES; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) in conjunction with the Postgraduate Program on Genetics and Animal Breeding, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (FCAV, UNESP). MVA Lemos, FLB Feitosa, and E Peripolli received scholarships from FAPESP, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. F Baldi and LG Albuquerque received support from FAPESP, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo grant #2011/21241-0 and Grant #2009/16118-5, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HLJC, EP, FLBF, MVAL, RLT, and RMOS contributed to the design and performance of the study, the interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript. MPB, BFO, RE, and MVAL contributed to the laboratorial analysis. SK, DGMG, LGA, HNO, AMF, LFM, and HT contributed to reviewing the manuscript. RMOS, IA, and RLT contributed to the statistical analysis. FB and ASCP designed the study and were in charge of the overall project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Jaboticabal-SP, Brazil.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by: Maciej Szydlowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiaia, H.L.J., Peripolli, E., de Oliveira Silva, R.M. et al. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes. J Appl Genetics 59, 493–501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-018-0470-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-018-0470-5

Keywords

Navigation