Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In-situ experimental campaign on the covering structures of “Villa dei Misteri” in Pompeii

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The archaeological site of Pompeii is located near modern Naples in the Italian region of Campania. As known, the ancient Roman city was mostly destroyed and buried under 4–6 m of ash and pumice in the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, and it remained covered until the beginnings of archaeological excavations during the second half of the XVIII century. Today, it is an UNESCO World Heritage Site and one of the most visited archaeological sites in the world. With the aim preserving a unique archaeological heritage, the Pompeii Archaeological Park is directing various projects which involve many scientists and expertise. Within this ambit of activity, ENEA has analysed the health state of the modern covering structures of Villa dei Misteri, an exceptionally well-preserved domus enriched by many precious frescoes. To qualify a standard analysis procedure applicable to similar roofing typologies, very common in the archaeological site of Pompeii, a methodology based on a multidisciplinary approach has been developed. This paper is focused on the in-depth diagnostic campaign carried out on the roof structures of the Peristylium, where both timber and reinforced concrete beams have been completely analysed. The campaign has been conducted in two subsequent steps: visual and geometrical survey and then in-situ non-destructive tests for the material characterisation. On the basis of the resulting data, a visual classification has been performed and very useful information for mechanical characterisation has been collected. Finally, a proposal of restoration intervention has been suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maiuri A (1937) Pompei: i nuovi scavi e la villa dei misteri. La Libreria dello Stato, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pompeii Archaeological Park (2014) Relazione di inquadramento del lavoro di verifica dello stato di conservazione delle coperture di Villa dei Misteri. Internal report, Archives of the Pompeii Archaeological Park, Pompeii

  3. Carpani B, Marghella G, Marzo A, Candigliota E, Immordino F, Bergamasco I (2014) A methodology for the safety assessment of protective roofs covering archaeological sites: the case of the Villa dei Misteri at Pompeii. In: SAHC2014—9th international conference on structural analysis of historical construction, Mexico City

  4. Bergamasco I, Bongiovanni G, Carpani B, Clemente P, Paciello A, Serafini S (2014) Ambient vibration analysis for the characterization of soil and coverings of Villa dei Misteri in Pompeii. In: SAHC2014—9th international conference on structural analysis of historical construction, Mexico City

  5. Maiuri A (1942) L’ultima fase edilizia di Pompei. Istituto di studi romani, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cavalli A, Togni M (2015) Monitoring of historical timber structures: state of the art and prospective. J Civ Struct Health Monit 5:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walach D, Jaskowska-Lemanska J, Dybel P (2015) The impact of moisture content of wood on the results of non-destructive tests. For Wood Technol 92:448–454

    Google Scholar 

  8. UNI-Ente italiano di normazione (2004) 11118:2004 Cultural Heritage—Wooden artefacts—criteria for the identification of wood species, Milano

  9. UNI-Ente italiano di normazione (2004) 11119:2004 Cultural Heritage—Wooden artefacts—Load-bearing structures—on site inpections for the diagnosis of timber members, Milano

  10. CEN-European Committee for Standardization (2002) EN 13183-2:2002 Moisture content of a piece of sawn timber—part 2: estimation by electrical resistance method, Bruxelles

  11. Dietsch P, Franke S, Franke B, Gamper A, Winter S (2015) Methods to determine wood moisture content and their applicability in monitoring concepts. J Civ Struct Health Monit 5:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Candigliota E, Immordino F (2013) Historical heritage safeguard: remote sensing by drones for knowledge and emergency. EAI Energia ambiente e Innovazione 3–4:78–85

    Google Scholar 

  13. Faggiano B, Grippa MR, Marzo A, Mazzolani F (2012) Experimental analysis on old chestnut timber by means of non-destructive techniques. In: 11th World conference on timber engineering 2010, Trentino

  14. Hayami N, Kobayashi S, Sugino M, Hayashi Y (2017) Study on an ultrasonic velocity of wood. All J Technol Des 23(54):469–474

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dackermann U, Crews K, Li J, Kasal B, Rinn F, Riggio M, Tannert T (2014) In situ assessment of structural timber using stress-wave measurements. Mater Struct 47(5):787–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasal B, Anthony RW (2004) Advances in in situ evaluation of timber structures. Prog Struct Mat Eng 6(8):94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu S-J, Xu J-M, Li G-Y, Risto V, Lu Z-H, Wang W (2010) Use of the pylodin for assessing wood properties in standing trees of Eucalyptus clones. J For Res 21(1):68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao S, Wang X, Wiemann MC, Brashaw BK, Ross RJ, Wang L (2017) A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees. Ann For Sci 74:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lourenço PB, Feio AO, Machado JS (2007) Chestnut wood in compression perpendicular to the grain: non-destructive correlation for test results in new and old wood. Constr Build Mater 21:1617–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feio A (2006) Inspection and diagnosis of historical timber structures: NDT correlations and structural behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Minho, Lisboa

  21. McCann DM, Forde MC (2011) Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures. NDT&E Int 34:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cristofaro MT, D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M (2009) Nuovi modelli previsionali per la stima della resistenza a compressione del calcestruzzo con il metodo SonReb. In: XIII Convegno ANIDIS “L’ingegneria sismica in Italia, Bologna

  23. Cristofaro MT, D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Pucinotti R (2012) Mechanical characterization of concrete from existing buildings with SonReb method. In: Proceedings of the fifthteenth World conference on earthquake engineering, Lisboa

  24. CEN-European Committee for Standardization (2012) EN 12504-2:2012 Testing concrete in structures - Part 2: Non-destructive testing - Determination of rebound number, Bruxelles

  25. CEN-European Committee for Standardization (2009) EN 12504-1:2009 Testing concrete in structures - Part 1: Cored specimens - Taking, examining and testing in compression, Bruxelles

  26. Meynink P, Samarin A (1979) Assessment of compressive strength of concrete by cylinders, cores and non-destructive tests. Met Constr 1:127–134

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ballivy G (1997) Testing of concrete in structures. Can J Civ Eng 24(5):848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krajci L, Janotka I (2000) Measurement techniques for rapid assessment of carbonation in concrete. ACI Struct J 97(2):168–171

    Google Scholar 

  29. Anagnostopoulou V, Pournou A (2013) Correlating visual grading with NDT methods for assessing timber condition in historic buildings. Adv Mater Res 778:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The activities here described have been carried out in the framework of an agreement between Pompeii Archaeological Park and ENEA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Parco Archeologico di Pompei, Via Villa dei Misteri 2, 80045, Pompei, NA, Italy

    Imma Bergamasco

  2. ENEA SSPT-MET-ISPREV, Via Martiri di Montesole 4, 40129, Bologna, Italy

    Anna Marzo & Giuseppe Marghella

  3. ENEA SSPT-MET-ISPREV, Centro Ricerche Brasimone, 40032, Camugnano, BO, Italy

    Bruno Carpani

Authors
  1. Imma Bergamasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Marzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuseppe Marghella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bruno Carpani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Marghella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergamasco, I., Marzo, A., Marghella, G. et al. In-situ experimental campaign on the covering structures of “Villa dei Misteri” in Pompeii. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8, 181–197 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0274-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0274-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation