This paper is about the question of whether or not virtual rape should be considered a crime under current law. A virtual rape is the rape of an avatar (a person’s virtual representation) in a virtual world. In the future, possibilities for virtual rape of a person him- or herself will arise in virtual reality environments involving a haptic device or robotics. As the title indicates, I will study both these present and future instances of virtual rape in light of three categories of legal philosophical theories on rape in order to answer the aforementioned question. I will argue that a virtual rape in a future virtual reality environment involving a haptic device or robotics should in principle count as the crime of rape; for it corresponds to rape as it is viewed under the liberal theories that currently dominate the law. A surprising finding will be that a virtual rape in a virtual world re-actualizes the conservative view of rape that used to dominate the law in the Middle Ages and resembles rape as it is viewed under the feminist theories that criticize current law. Virtual rape in a virtual world cannot count as rape under current law; however, and at the end of this paper, I will suggest qualifying it as sexual harassment instead.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
It should probably be added that hacking (in the sense of illegal access) already constitutes a crime in itself for which the user could be held liable (see e.g., article 2 Convention on Cybercrime).
It is important to emphasize that this definition of virtual rape is only applicable to virtual worlds, which are accessed by multiple users at the same time and not to single-player computer games like the infamous RapeLay (2006) in which users can rape virtual characters that do not represent other users.
Roxxxy and Rocky would make the wearing of the goggles and dataglove or datasuit from Zhai’s scenario superfluous; for they are not needed to give users the impression that they can see and touch the person they have sex with, users can touch their robots and they will look and feel the same as a real human being.
Note that the policemen in Grand Theft Auto are not representations of other users. There is thus no real person ‘behind’ the virtual policemen who could be shocked or otherwise emotionally effected.
The terms “actus reus” and “mens rea” derive specifically from Anglo-American jurisprudence. But these elements are, although under a different name, also found in other legal systems.
Cf. the Dutch convictions for theft of virtual items in the virtual worlds of the online multiplayer computer games Habbo and RuneScape (Rechtbank Amsterdam, 2 April 2009, ECLI: NL: RBAMS: 2009: BH9789, BH9790, BH9791; Hoge Raad, 31 January 2012, ECLI: NL: HR: 2012: BQ9251). The judges in these cases argued that the act of stealing virtual property can be brought under the scope of the prohibition on theft if it has real (emotional or financial) consequences. Note that the latter case was decided by the Dutch Supreme Court.
Note that certain interests which are less vital for our well-being are protected as well, but by civil instead of criminal law.
It should be added that sexual intercourse with a person who is, under law, incapable of consenting to sex, i.e., minors and physically and/or mentally incapacitated persons, is usually considered rape in itself (statutory rape).
It should be added that virtual rape involving avatars that appear to be minors can be seen as virtual child pornography, which falls under the scope of the prohibition on child pornography in many countries (see, e.g., article 9 (2) c Convention on Cybercrime <http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/ Reports/html/185.htm>). Virtual child pornography raises issues of its own. This paper only deals with cases of virtual rape in which the avatars appear to be adults.
Allen, C. (2010). Artificial life, artificial agents, virtual realities: technologies of autonomous agency. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 219–233). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Brenner, S. W. (2008). Fantasy crime: the role of criminal law in virtual worlds. Vanderbilt Journal Of Entertainment And Technology Law, 11(1), 1–97.
Brey, P. (2008). Virtual reality and computer simulation. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 361–384). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Brey, P. (2014). The physical and social reality of virtual worlds. In M. Grimshaw (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtuality (pp. 42–54). New York: Oxford UP.
Burgess, M. C. R., Stermer, S. P., & Burgess, S. R. (2007). Sex, lies, and video games: the portrayal of male and female characters on video game covers. Sex Roles, 57, 419–433.
Burgess-Jackson, K. (1996). Rape: a philosophical investigation. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Burman, M. (2010). Rethinking rape law in Sweden: coercion, consent or non-voluntariness? In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. international and comparative perspectives (pp. 196–208). Routledge: Abingdon.
Cowan, S. (2010). All change or business as usual? Reforming the law of rape in Scotland. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 154–168). Abingdon: Routledge.
Davidson, N. (1991). Feminism and sexual harassment. Society, 28(4), 39–44.
Dibbell, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace/how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. The Village Voice.
Dillow, C. (2010). A customizable, anatomically correct robotic girlfriend with multiple personalities, <http://www.popsci.com>.
Duranske, B. (2007). Reader roundtable: “virtual rape” claim brings Belgian police to Second Life. Virtually Blind, <http://virtuallyblind.com>.
Dworkin, R. M. (1976). Is law a system of rules? In R. S. Summers (Ed.), Essays in legal philosophy (pp. 25–60). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fairfield, J. A. T. (2009). The magic circle. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11(4), 823–840.
Feinberg, J. (1984). The moral limits of the criminal law, volume one, harm to others. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Franke, K.M. (1996–1997). What’s wrong with sexual harassment? Stanford Law Review, 49, 691–772.
Gotell, L. (2010). Canadian sexual assault law: neoliberalism and the erosion of feminist-inspired law reforms. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 209–223). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hale, M. (1847). History of the pleas of the crown. In E. Sollom (Ed.), The history of the pleas of the crown, first American edition. Philadelphia: Robert H. Small. Original work published in 1736.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Herring, J., & Dempsey, M. M. (2010). Rethinking the criminal law’s response to sexual penetration. On theory and context. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 30–43). Routledge: Abingdon.
Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo ludens. Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. In L. Brummel et al. (Eds.), Johan Huizinga, Verzamelde werken V (Cultuurgeschiedenis III) (pp. 26–246). Haarlem: H.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon. Original work published in 1938.
LambdaMOO [Computer software]. (1990). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox PARC.
Lynn, R. (2004). Ins and outs of teledildonics. Wired, <http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/commentary/sexdrive/2004/09/65064>.
MacKinnon, R. (1997). Virtual rape. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4), 1–20.
McGlynn, Clare (2010). Feminist activism and rape law reform in England and Wales: a Sisyphean struggle? In: Clare McGlynn & Vanessa E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape Law: international and comparative perspectives (pp. 139–153). Abingdon (Oxfordshire): Routledge.
McGlynn, C., & Munro, V. E. (2010). Rethinking rape law: an introduction. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 1–14). Abingdon: Routledge.
Mill, J. S. (1865). On liberty. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Mills, S. W. (2010). Reforming the law of rape in South Africa. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 251–263). Abingdon: Routledge.
Munro, V. E. (2010). From consent to coercion. Evaluating international and domestic frameworks for the criminalization of rape. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 17–29). Abingdon: Routledge.
Radačić, I., & Turković, K. (2010). Rethinking Croatian rape laws: force, consent and ‘the contribution of the victim’. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 169–182). Abingdon: Routledge.
RapeLay [Computer software]. (2006). Yokohama, Japan: Illusion Soft.
Rush, P. (2010). Criminal law and the reformation of rape in Australia. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law. International and comparative perspectives (pp. 237–250). Abingdon: Routledge.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play. Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Second Life [Computer software]. (2003). San Francisco, CA: Linden Research Inc.
Søraker, J.H. (2010). The value of virtual worlds and entities. A philosophical analysis of virtual worlds and their potential impact on well-being (doctoral dissertation). Enschede: Ipskamp.
Søraker, J. H. (2012). Virtual worlds and their challenge to philosophy: understanding the “intravirtual” and the “extravirtual”. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 499–512.
Strikwerda, L. (2013). When should virtual cybercrime be brought under the scope of criminal law? In M. K. Rogers & K. C. Seigfried-Spellar (Eds.), Digital forensics and cyber crime (LNICST) (Vol. 114, pp. 109–143). Berlin: Springer.
Whisnant, R. (2009). Feminist perspectives on rape. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-rape>.
Zhai, P. (1998). Get real. A philosophical adventure in virtual reality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Council of Europe, convention on cybercrime and explanatory report, Budapest, 23 November 2001 (CETS No.185). Accessible via <http://conventions.coe.int>.
Crimes Act 1961 No 43. Retrieved from <http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html#DLM3290 > .
Criminal Law (sexual offences and related matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007. Retrieved from <http://www.justice.go.za/legislation/acts/2007-032.pdf>.
General civil penal code. Retrieved from <http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATION ANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/NOR_penal_code.pdf>.
Penal Law 5737-1977. Retrieved from <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/58/43289694.pdf>.
Recommendation No. 19 to the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, accessible via <http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/states.htm>.
Sexual Offences Act 2003. Retrieved from <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42>.
Strafgesetzbuch. Retrieved from <http://www.stgb.de>. (Available in German only).
Strafwetboek. Retrieved from <http://www.belgischrecht.be>. (Available in Dutch only).
Wetboek van Strafrecht. Retrieved from <http://wetten.overheid.nl>. (Available in Dutch only).
Table of Cases
About this article
Cite this article
Strikwerda, L. Present and Future Instances of Virtual Rape in Light of Three Categories of Legal Philosophical Theories on Rape. Philos. Technol. 28, 491–510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0167-6
- Virtual rape
- Legal philosophical theories of rape
- Sexual harassment