Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid reconstitution packages (RRPs) for stable storage and delivery of glucagon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Drug Delivery and Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 February 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Current emergency injectors of glucagon require manual reconstitution, which involves several steps that may lead to dosage errors. Rapid reconstitution packages (RRPs) are new devices, designed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to optimize fluid mixing, integrating physical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients and diluents. RRPs improve drug stability for long-term storage and ease of delivery. Device prototypes were manufactured using advanced stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printing technology. Reconstitution of glucagon with RRPs was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and optical spectroscopy methods. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed to test in vitro activity. Experimental results showed that RRPs effectively reconstituted glucagon even after exposure to 60 °C for a 24-h period. RRPs exhibited improved performance at maintaining drug stability compared to lyophilized glucagon stored in a standard glass vial under the same temperature conditions. RRPs represent a portable platform for rapid reconstitution of lyophilized drugs, compatible with standard syringes available in any clinical setting. The RRP provides an alternative to manual reconstitution process, especially designed for medical emergencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 February 2019

    Following are updated Figs. 1, 3, 5, and 7. The original article has also been updated: Fig. 1 a RRP. b RRP dimensions. c RRP inside of syringe. Fig. 3 RRP activation and fluid flow.

References

  1. Powers AC, Endocrine Pancreas D’A, D. Pharmacotherapy of diabetes mellitus and hypoglycemia. In: Brunton L, Chabner BA, Knollmann BC, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, twelfth edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 2011.

  2. Amiel SA, Dixon T, Mann R, Jameson K. Hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2008;25(3):245–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H. Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1902–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cryer PE. Hierarchy of physiological responses to hypoglycemia: relevance to clinical hypoglycemia in type I (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus. Horm Metab Res. 1997;29(3):92–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kedia N. Treatment of severe diabetic hypoglycemia with glucagon: an underutilized therapeutic approach. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes: Targets Ther. 2011;4:337–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stephani TC, Haymond WM. Minimizing morbidity of hypoglycemia in diabetes: a review of mini-dose glucagon. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(1):44–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shafiee G, Mohajeri-Tehrani M, Pajouhi M, Larijani B. The importance of hypoglycemia in diabetic patients. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayo Clinic website http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseasesconditions/hypoglycemia/basics/treatment/con-20021103 [Accessed, September 3, 2017] 2017.

  9. Lilly glucagon official site: http://www.lillyglucagon.com/severe-low-blood-sugar-[Accessed September 3, 2017] 2017.

  10. GlucaGen official site: http://www.glucagenhypokit.com/ [Accessed September 3, 2017] 2017.

  11. McDowell SE, Mt-Isa S, Ashby D, Ferner RE. Where errors occur in the preparation and administration of intravenous medicines: a systematic review and Bayesian analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):341–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grissinger M. Reducing errors with injectable medications. P T. 2010;35(8):428–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheeler DW, Degnan BA, Sehmi JS, Burnstein RW, Menon DK, Gupta AK. Variability in the concentrations of intravenous drug infusions prepared in a critical care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(8):1441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parshuram CS, To T, Seto W, Trope A, Koren G, Laupacis A. Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication. CMAJ. 2008;178(1):42–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aronson JK. Medication errors: what they are, how they happen, and how to avoid them. Q J Med. 2009;102:513–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaufmann J, et al. Medication errors in pediatric emergencies: a systematic analysis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(38):609–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Merry AF, Anderson BJ. Medication errors-new approaches to prevention. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21:743–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Motaarefi H, Mahmoudi H, Mohammadi E, Hasanpour-Dehkordi A. Factors associated with needlestick injuries in health care occupations: a systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(8):IE01–IE042.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherr JL, Ruedy KJ, Foster NC, Piché CA, Dulude H, Rickels MR, et al. Glucagon nasal powder: a promising alternative to intramuscular glucagon in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:555–62.

  20. Locemia website: http://www.locemia.com/. [Accessed September 3, 2017] 2017.

  21. Reno EF, Normand P, McInally K, Silo S, Stotland P, Triest M, et al. A novel nasal powder formulation of glucagon: toxicology studies in animal models. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;16:29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pontiroli AI. Intranasal glucagon: a promising approach for treatment of severe hypoglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(1):38–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Seaquist ER, Dulude H, Zhang XM, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Tsoukas GM, Conway JR, et al. Prospective study evaluating the use of nasal glucagon for the treatment of moderate to severe hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes in a real-world setting. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1316–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pontiroli AE, Calderara A, Pozza G. Intranasal drug delivery: potential advantages and limitations from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989;17(5):299–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deeb LC, Dulude H, Guzman CB, Zhang S, Reiner BJ, Piché CA, et al. A phase 3 multicenter, open-label, prospective study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and ease of use of nasal glucagon in the treatment of moderate and severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the home or school setting. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19:1007–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pontiroli AE, Ceriani V. Intranasal glucagon for hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients. An old dream is becoming reality? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1812–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chi A, Curi S, Clayton K, Luciano D, Klauber K, Alexander-Katz A, et al. Rapid reconstitution packages (RRPs) implemented by integration of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 3D printed microfluidics. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2014;4:320–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. SolidWorks 2013 Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ANSYS. Inc Release Notes; 2013. p. V15.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sacha GA, Saffell-Clemmer W, Abram K, Akers MJ. Practical fundamentals of glass, rubber, and plastic sterile packaging systems. Pharm Dev Technol. 2010;15(1):6–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work was partially supported by GearJump Technologies, LLC, and the US Army Research Office via the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), contract: W911NF-07-D-0004. The corresponding author’s former affiliation was the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN) at MIT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel M. Elman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

N. M. Elman works at GearJump Technologies, LLC. S. D’hers, A. N. Abad Vazquez, and P. Gurman declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: Figs. 1, 3, 5, and 7 and their captions have been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’hers, S., Abad Vazquez, A.N., Gurman, P. et al. Rapid reconstitution packages (RRPs) for stable storage and delivery of glucagon. Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res. 9, 631–640 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-019-00615-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-019-00615-4

Keywords

Navigation