China Ocean Engineering

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 62–73 | Cite as

An Improved Spectral Analysis Method for Fatigue Damage Assessment of Details in Liquid Cargo Tanks

Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Errors will be caused in calculating the fatigue damages of details in liquid cargo tanks by using the traditional spectral analysis method which is based on linear system, for the nonlinear relationship between the dynamic stress and the ship acceleration. An improved spectral analysis method for the assessment of the fatigue damage in detail of a liquid cargo tank is proposed in this paper. Based on assumptions that the wave process can be simulated by summing the sinusoidal waves in different frequencies and the stress process can be simulated by summing the stress processes induced by these sinusoidal waves, the stress power spectral density (PSD) is calculated by expanding the stress processes induced by the sinusoidal waves into Fourier series and adding the amplitudes of each harmonic component with the same frequency. This analysis method can take the nonlinear relationship into consideration and the fatigue damage is then calculated based on the PSD of stress. Take an independent tank in an LNG carrier for example, the accuracy of the improved spectral analysis method is proved much better than that of the traditional spectral analysis method by comparing the calculated damage results with the results calculated by the time domain method. The proposed spectral analysis method is more accurate in calculating the fatigue damages in detail of ship liquid cargo tanks.

Keywords

liquid cargo tank nonlinear system fatigue damage spectral analysis method dynamic pressure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), 2016. Guide for Spectral-Based Fatigue Analysis for Vessels, American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, 15–16.Google Scholar
  2. Benasciutti, D., Cristofori, A. and Tovo, R., 2013. Analogies between spectral methods and multiaxial criteria in fatigue damage evaluation, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 31, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benasciutti, D. and Tovo, R., 2006. Comparison of spectral methods for fatigue analysis of broad-band Gaussian random processes, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21(4), 287–299.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendat, J.S., 1964. Vibration-data analysis. Part I. Theoretical considerations, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36(5), 1020.Google Scholar
  5. Bouyssy, V., Naboishikov, S.M. and Rackwitz, R., 1993. Comparison of analytical counting methods for Gaussian processes, Structural Safety, 12(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braccesi, C., Cianetti, F. and Tomassini, L., 2016. An innovative modal approach for frequency domain stress recovery and fatigue damage evaluation, International Journal of Fatigue, 91, 382–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. China Classification Society (CCS), 2013. Guide for the fatigue Assessment of Offshore Structures, China Communications Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Dai, Y.S., Shen, J.W. and Song, J.Z., 2007. Ship Wave Loads, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 108–109. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Dirlik, T., 1985. Application of Computers in Fatigue Analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick, England.Google Scholar
  10. Du, Z.L. and Liao, R.D., 2016. Fatigue life prediction and optimization of pipeline under random loads, International Conference on Mechanics, Materials and Structural Engineering, Jeju Island, 407–413.Google Scholar
  11. Ge, F. and Dai, Y.S., 2005. Accumulated damage calculation for ship hull of overall longitudinal bending including combined stress and nonlinear wave loads, Journal of Ship Mechanics, 9(1), 71–78. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Halfpenny, A., 1999. A frequency domain approach for fatigue life estimation from finite element analysis, Key Engineering Materials, 167–168, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kukkanen, T. and Mikkola, T.P.J., 2004. Fatigue assessment by spectral approach for the ISSC comparative study of the hatch cover bearing pad, Marine Structures, 17(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kvittem, M.I. and Moan, T., 2015. Time domain analysis procedures for fatigue assessment of a semi-submersible wind turbine, Marine Structures, 40, 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen, C.E. and Irvine, T., 2015. A review of spectral methods for variable amplitude fatigue prediction and new results, Procedia Engineering, 101, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, K., Chen, G.M., Chang, Y.J., Zhu, B.R., Liu, X.Q. and Han, B.B., 2016. Nonlinear dynamic analysis and fatigue damage assessment for a deepwater test string subjected to random loads, Petroleum Science, 13(1), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, X.C., Feng, G.Q. and Ren, H.L., 2006. Study on the application of spectral fatigue analysis, Journal of Marine Science and Application, 5(2), 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lutes, L.D. and Larsen, C.E., 1990. An improved spectral method for variable amplitude fatigue prediction, Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(4), 1149–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, J. and Lutes, L.D., 2015. The effect of nonlinear drag PSD on fatigue of compliant offshore structures, Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation, ASCE, 1355–1360.Google Scholar
  20. Wang, Y.G., 2010. Spectral fatigue analysis of a ship structural detail–A practical case study, International Journal of Fatigue, 32(2), 310–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wirsching, P.H. and Shehata, A.M., 1977. Fatigue under wide band random stresses using the rain-flow method, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 99(3), 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao, W.W. and Baker, M.J., 1992. On the probability density function of rainflow stress range for stationary Gaussian processes, International Journal of Fatigue, 14(2), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Ocean Engineering Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea ExplorationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations