Abstract
Identification of risk factors for diabetic foot and creation of risk classifications based on these factors are important for prevention of diabetic foot. We have created a simple screening score system based on information obtained during routine medical checkups to identify patients at high risk of developing diabetic foot and examined the efficacy of this system. We compared 108 patients in the diabetic foot ulcer group with 108 age and sex-matched controls who were hospitalized at Saiseikai Central Hospital in Tokyo. The risk scores of 316 diabetic outpatients whose feet were examined from April 2011 to September 2012 were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of the risk score to diagnose high-risk patients in categories ≥1 of the risk classification of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Differences between the ulcer and control groups were observed for 5 items: (1) diabetes duration, (2) average corrected bilateral visual acuity, (3) estimated glomerular filtration rate, (4) marital status, and (5) occupation. Multiple logistic analysis was performed using these items as independent variables, and the scoring system was created from the odds ratios. The scoring system cutoff value (≥7) was 56.9 % sensitive and 95.2 % specific for patients in IWGDF category ≥1 when applied in 316 outpatient foot examinations, and its ROC area under the curve was 0.865 (95 % CI, 0.83–0.91). High-risk diabetes patients were effectively identified by evaluating risk factors that included social characteristics and clinical examination findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reiber GE. The epidemiology of diabetic foot problems. Diabet Med: J Br Diabet Assoc. 1996;13(Suppl 1):S6–11.
Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:217–28.
Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Schaper NC. International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(Suppl 1):S84–92.
Monteiro-Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro J, Ribeiro I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Risk stratification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review. Diabetologia. 2011;54:1190–9.
Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Cohen V, Nelson KM, Heagerty PJ. Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer occurrence using commonly available clinical information: the Seattle Diabetic Foot Study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1202–7.
van Houtum WH. Barriers to implementing foot care. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(Suppl 1):112–5.
Tol A, Pourreza A, Shojaeezadeh D, Mahmoodi M, Mohebbi B. The Assessment of relations between socioeconomic status and number of complications among type 2 diabetic patients. Iran J Public Health. 2012;41:66–72.
Altenburg N, Joraschky P, Barthel A, et al. Alcohol consumption and other psycho-social conditions as important factors in the development of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med: J Br Diabet Assoc. 2011;28:168–74.
Peters EJ, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG. Diabetic lower extremity infection: influence of physical, psychological, and social factors. J Diabetes Complications. 2005;19:107–12.
Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.
Sriussadaporn S, Mekanandha P, Vannasaeng S, et al. Factors associated with diabetic foot ulceration in Thailand: a case-control study. Diabet Med: J Br Diabet Assoc. 1997;14:50–6.
Pinzur MS, Slovenkai MP, Trepman E, Shields NN. Guidelines for diabetic foot care: recommendations endorsed by the Diabetes Committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle Int/Am Orthop Foot Ankle Soc Swiss Foot Ankle Soc. 2005;26:113–9.
Paraskevas KI, Mukherjee D, Whayne TF Jr. Peripheral arterial disease: implications beyond the peripheral circulation. Angiology. 2013;64:569–71.
Sasamoto M, Kuboki K, Kameyama M. Use of Semmes―Weinstein monofilaments to screening diabetes patients for high risk of foot ulcer and gangrene. J Jpn Diabetes Soc. 2006;49:189–95.
Ali MK, Bullard KM, Gregg EW. Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999–2010. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:287–8.
Kabeya Y, Kawasaki M, Okisugi M, et al. Quality control in diabetes care using a method of statistical process control. Diabetol Int. 2013 (Published on line:28 December 2013)
Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, Forsberg RC, Davignon DR, Smith DG. A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1036–42.
Crawford F, Inkster M, Kleijnen J, Fahey T. Predicting foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM: Mon J Assoc Physicians. 2007;100:65–86.
Yekta Z, Pourali R, Nezhadrahim R, Ravanyar L, Ghasemi-Rad M. Clinical and behavioral factors associated with management outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2011;4:371–5.
Reiber GE, Pecoraro RE, Koepsell TD. Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus. A case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:97–105.
Lammintausta A, Immonen-Raiha P, Airaksinen JK, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in the morbidity and mortality of acute coronary events in Finland: 1988 to 2002. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:87–93.
Harwant S, Doshi HK, Moissinac K, Abdullah BT. Factors related to adverse outcome in inpatients with diabetic foot. Med J Malaysia. 2000;55:236–41.
Mugambi-Nturibi E, Otieno CF, Kwasa TO, Oyoo GO, Acharya K. Stratification of persons with diabetes into risk categories for foot ulceration. East Afr Med J. 2009;86:233–9.
Peters EJ, Lavery LA. Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1442–7.
Acknowledgments
The study was not funded by a grant from any company. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Conflict of interest
The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest. M. Tomita wrote the paper and analyzed the data. M. Okisugi, M Kawasaki, T. Katsuki, Y. Oikawa, and Y. Atsumi reviewed/edited the paper. Y. Kabeya and A. Shimada contributed to the discussion and reviewed/edited the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Tomita, M., Kabeya, Y., Okisugi, M. et al. Development and assessment of a simple scoring system for the risk of developing diabetic foot. Diabetol Int 6, 212–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-014-0189-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-014-0189-4