Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 171–179 | Cite as

The influence of table grape rootstock and cultivar combinations on susceptibility to downy mildew

  • Luciane Bertoletti Barros
  • Luiz Antonio Biasi
  • Odile Carisse
  • Louise Larissa May De Mio
Original Paper
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) is among the most important grape disease in the world. Disease control is mostly based on preventive management, including reduction of overwintering inoculum, green pruning, use of less susceptible cultivars, and fungicide applications. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and severity of P. viticola and the resulting defoliation in three Vitis labrusca cultivars (‘Concord,’ ‘Bordô’ and ‘BRS Carmem’) grafted onto three different rootstocks (Paulsen 1103, IAC 766 and VR 043–43) in a commercial vineyard in a subtropical area. To compare the responses of each cultivar and rootstock combination, the experiments were carried out on ridges with a semi-trellis system. Disease incidence and severity were assessed every 14 days from September to March in 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 on the last 10 leaves of specific shoots on six plants of each of the nine different combinations. During the growing season, weather conditions were favorable to the development of the disease. Symptoms started in the vegetative phase and continued during fruiting. There were significant differences between cultivars with ‘BRS Carmem’ being the most susceptible to downy mildew and ‘Concord’ the least susceptible, but rootstocks had no significant influence on downy mildew severity.

Keywords

Defoliation Epidemiology Incidence Plasmopara viticola Severity Vitis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by CAPES, CNPq and Universidade Federal do Paraná.

References

  1. Amorim L, Kuniyuki H (2005) Doenças da Videira (Vitis spp.) In: Manual de Fitopatologia: Doenças das Plantas Cultivadas. Agronômica Ceres Ltda, São Paulo, pp 639–651Google Scholar
  2. Anzanello R, Souza PVD, Coelho PF (2011) Desfolha em videiras americanas e viníferas na fase de pré-maturação dos frutos. Ciência Rural 41:1132–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azevedo LAS (1997) Manual de quantificação de doenças de plantas. Novartis, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros LB, Biasi LA, Odile C, May De Mio LL (2015a) Incidence of grape anthracnose on different Vitis labrusca and hybrid cultivars and rootstocks combination under humid subtropical climate. Australas Plant Pathol 44:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barros LB, Margoti G, Fowler JG, May De Mio LL, Biasi LA (2015b) Thermal requirement and phenology of different cultivars of Vitis labrusca on different rootstocks. Semina Agrárias 36:2433–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boso S, Santiago JL, Martínez MC (2007) Influence of rootstock on resistance of Vitis cv. ‘Albariño’ clones to downy mildew. Eur J Hortic Sci 72:179–185Google Scholar
  7. Brook PJ (1973) Epidemiology of grapevine anthracnose, caused by Elsinoe ampelina. N Z J Agric Res 16:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cadle-Davidson L (2008) Variation within and between Vitis spp. for foliar resistance to the downy mildew pathogen Plasmopara viticola. Plant Dis 92:1577–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camargo UA (2003) Uvas Viníferas para Processamento em Regiões de Clima Temperado. Embrapa Uva e Vinho (Sistemas de PRO, 4)Google Scholar
  10. Camargo UA, Maia JDG (2008) Cultivares de uvas rústicas para regiões tropicais e subtropicais. In: Uvas rústicas de mesa: cultivo e processamento em regiões tropicais, Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Jales, pp 63–90Google Scholar
  11. Camargo UA, Maia JDG, Ritschel P (2008) BRS Carmem - Nova cultivar de uva tardia para suco. Embrapa Uva e Vinho (Comunicado Técnico, 84), Bento GonçalvesGoogle Scholar
  12. Camargo UA, Tonietto J, Hoffmann A (2011) Progressos na viticultura brasileira. http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/fruticultura/files/2011/10/pag144_149- Palestra098-11.pdf. Accessed 08/11/2017)
  13. Carisse O (2015) Development of grape downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) under northern viticulture conditions: influence of fall disease incidence. Eur J Plant Pathol 144:773–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chavarria G, dos Santos HP, Sônego OR, Marodin GAB, Bergamaschi H, Cardoso LS (2007) Incidência de doenças e necessidade de controle em cultivo protegido de videira. Rev Bras Frutic 29:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czermainski ABC, Sônego OR (2004) Influência das condições climáticas sobre a eficácia de fungicidas empregados para o controle do míldio em Vitis vinifera. Ciência Rural 34:5–11Google Scholar
  16. Dalbó MA, Schuck E (2003) Avaliação do uso de fosfitos para o controle do míldio da videira. Agropecuária Catarinense 16:33–35Google Scholar
  17. Erbs CS, Gomes ECS, Leite RP, Silva FJA, Cavalcanti LS, Nascimento LC, Silva SM (2011) Manejo do míldio e ferrugem em videira com indutores de resistência: produtividade e qualidade pós-colheita. Tropical Plant Pathology 36:332–335Google Scholar
  18. Gessler C, Pertot I, Perazzolli M (2011) Plasmopara viticola: a review of knowledge on downy mildew of grapevine and effective disease management. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:3–44Google Scholar
  19. Giovaninni E (2001) Uva agroecológica. Renascença, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  20. Gobbin D, Jermini M, Loskill B, Pertot I, Raynal M, Gessler C (2005) Importance of secondary inoculum of Plasmopara viticola to epidemics of grapevine downy mildew. Plant Pathol 54:522–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamada E, Ghini R, Rossi P, Pedro Júnior MJ, Fernandes JL (2008) Climatic risk of grape downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) for the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Agric 65:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lafon R, Clerjeau M (1988) Downy mildew. In: Compendium of grape diseases. American Phytopathological society. APS, Minnesota, pp 11–13Google Scholar
  23. Lalancette N, Madden LV, Ellis MA (1988) A quantitative model for describing esporulation of Plasmopara viticola on grape leaves. Phytopathology 78:1316–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madden LV, Ellis MA (2000) Evaluation of a disease warning system for downy mildew of grapes. Plant Dis 84:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maia JDG, Camargo UA (2005) Sistema de Produção de Uvas Rústicas para Processamento em Regiões Tropicais do Brasil. Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Bento GonçalvesGoogle Scholar
  26. Mendes CS (2002) Flutuação de inóculo no ar, desenvolvimento e validação de um sistema de previsão do míldio-da-videira. Dissertation, Universidade de Passo FundoGoogle Scholar
  27. Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1994) Biology of the grapevine. University of Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Nachtigal JC, Camargo UA (2005) Sistema de Produção de Uva de Mesa no Norte do Paraná. Embrapa Uva e Vinho (Sistemas de PRO, 10)Google Scholar
  29. Nachtigal JC, Camargo UA (2007) Recomendações para Produção de Videiras em Sistemas de Base Ecológica. Embrapa Uva e Vinho (Sistemas de PRO, 65)Google Scholar
  30. Naves RL, Garrido LR, Sônego OR (2006) Controle de doenças fúngicas em uvas de mesa na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo. Embrapa Uva e Vinho (Circular Técnica, 68), Bento GonçalvesGoogle Scholar
  31. Pedro Júnior MJ, Pommer CVA, Martins FP, Ribeiro IJA (1992) Influência da diminuição da área foliar na produtividade e na duração do ciclo da videira ‘Niagara Rosada’. Bragantia 51:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Picena AMP (1935) Lições de Viticultura – Curso Prático de Fruticultura e Enologia de São Roque. Secretaria da Agricultura, Industria e Comercio do Estado de São Paulo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinto KMS, Nascimento LC, Gomes ECS, Silva HF, Miranda JR (2012) Efficiency of resistance elicitors in the management of grapevine downy mildew Plasmopara viticola: epidemiological, biochemical and economic aspects. Eur J Plant Pathol 134:745–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  35. Reich BI, Pool RM, Peterson DV, Martens M, Henick-Kling T (1993) Wine and Juice Grape Varieties for Cool Climates. Information Bulletin 233. Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication, Geneva, NYGoogle Scholar
  36. Ren Z, Lu J (2002) Muscadine rootstock increased the resistance of Florida hybrid bunch grape cv. ‘Blanc du Boi’ to Pierce’s and anthracnose diseases. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 115:108–110Google Scholar
  37. Reynier A (1986) Parte III – Cultura da Videira. pp. 201–424. In: Manual de Viticultura. Publicações Europa-América Ltda, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosa RCT, Coelho RSB, Tavares SCCH, Cavalcanti VALB (2007) Efeito de indutores no controle de míldio em Vitis labrusca. Summa Phytopathologica, Botucatu 33:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossi V, Caffia T, Bugianib R, Spannac F, Della Valled D (2008) Estimating the germination dynamics of Plasmopara viticola oospores using hydro-thermal time. Plant Pathol 57:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rouxel M, Mestre P, Baudoin A, Carisse O, Delière L, Ellis MA, Gadoury D, Lu J, Nita M, Richard-Cervera S, Schilder A, Wise A, Delmotte F (2014) Geographic distribution of species of Plasmopara viticola causing downy mildew on wild and cultivated grapes in eastern North America. Phytopathology 104:692–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Satisha J, Doshi P, Adsule PG (2008) Influence of rootstocks on changing the pattern of phenolic compounds in Thompson seedless grapes and its relationship to the incidence of powdery mildew. Turk J Agric For 32:1–9Google Scholar
  42. Sentelhas PC, Gillespie TJ, Gleason ML, Monteiro JEBA, Helland ST (2004) Operational exposure of leaf wetness sensors. Agric For Meteorol 126:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sentelhas PC, Gillespie TJ, Batzer JC, Gleason ML, Monteiro JEBA, Pezzopane JRM, Pedro Júnior MJ (2005) Spatial variability of leaf wetness duration in different crop canopies. Int J Biometeorol 49:363–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Soares JM, Leão PCS (2009) A Vitivinicultura no Semiárido brasileiro. Petrolina, PE: Embrapa semi-árido. Embrapa informação tecnológica, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  45. Somkuwar RG, Jogaiah S, Sawant SD, Taware PB, Bondage DD, Itroutwar P (2014) Rootstocks influence the growth, biochemical contents and disease incidence in Thompson Seedless grapevines. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology 4:1030–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sônego OR, Garrido LR, Grigoletti Júnior A (2003) Doenças fúngicas. In: Uva para processamento - Fitossanidade. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, (Frutas do Brasil, 35), Brasília, pp 11–14Google Scholar
  47. Sônego OR, Garrido LR and Grigoletti Júnior A (2005) Principais doenças fúngicas da videira no sul do Brasil. Embrapa Uva e Vinho. Bento Gonçalves. (Circular Técnica, 56), Bento GonçalvesGoogle Scholar
  48. Steimetz E, Trouvelot S, Gindro K, Bordier A, Poinssot B, Adrian M, Daire X (2012) Influence of leaf age on induced resistance in grapevine against Plasmopara viticola. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 79:89–96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Fitotecnia e Fitossanitarismo, Setor de Ciências AgráriasUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSt-Jean-sur-RichelieuCanada

Personalised recommendations