Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard technique for the treatment of gallbladder disease. However, in some cases, conversion to open surgery is still necessary. Identification of patients with high risk of conversion is of great importance to prepare the surgical scenario and to anticipate the convalescence. The objective of this study is to identify the factors that may predict a conversion to an open procedure. A total of 1386 LC were performed in Dr. Manuel Gea González General Hospital, from January 2009 to May 2013. A retrospective analysis of 41 parameters in these patients was performed, including demographic variables, clinical history, laboratory studies, ultrasound results and intraoperative findings. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive variables for conversion. Fourteen patients required conversion (1%). The multivariate analysis revealed that the factor that was most associated with conversion was emergency surgery (OR 4.9, CI 95% 2.3–2.4), as well as dilatation > 6 mm of the common bile duct in ultrasound (OR 1.8, CI 95% 1.1–1.7), hepatomegaly (OR 1.3, CI 95% 0.3–4.9), diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis associated to previous biliary colics (OR 2.8, CI 95% 1.0–21) and elevated alanine aminotransaminase (OR 1.2, CI 95% 1.0–2.1). Patients with acute symptoms, with dilatation of the bile duct, cholestasis history and hepatomegaly have a higher risk of a conversion surgery. These factors may warn both the patient and the surgeon for a complex surgery and possible complications.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Conversion surgery Endoscopic cholecystectomy
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in the participants of our study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study formal consent was not required.
Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006231Google Scholar
Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE et al (2002) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg 6(6):800–805CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kanaan SA, Murayama KM, Merriam LT et al (2002) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 106:20–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
van der Steeg HJJ, Alexander S, Houterman S et al (2011) Risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy—experiences from a general teaching hospital. Scand J Surg 100:169–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Poggio JL, Rowland CM, Gores GJ et al (2000) A comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in patients with compensated cirrhosis and symptomatic gallstone disease. Surgery 127:405–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Clark JR, Wills VL, Hunt DR (2001) Cirrhosis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:165–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar