Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of MRS and SMA Dampers Effects on Bridge Seismic Resistance Employing Analytical Models

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study dealt with investigating the seismic performance of the smart and shape memory alloy (SMA) and magnets plus rubber-spring (MRS) dampers and their effects on the seismic resistance of multiple-span simply supported bridges. The rubber springs in the MRS dampers were pre-compressed. For this aim, a set of experimental works was performed together with developing nonlinear analytical models to investigate dynamic responses of the bridges subjected to earthquakes. Fragility analysis and probabilistic assessment were conducted to assess the seismic performance for the overall bridge system. Fragility curves were then generated for each model and were compared with those of as-built. Results showed dampers could increase the seismic capacity of bridges. Furthermore, from system fragility curves, use of damper models reduced the seismic vulnerability in comparison to the as-built bridge model. Although the SMA damper showed the best seismic performance, the MRS damper was the most appropriate one for the bridge in that the combination of magnetic friction and pre-compressed rubber springs was cheaper than the shape memory alloy, and had the similar capability of the damper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adanur, S., Altunisik, A. C., Basaga, H. B., Soyluk, K., & Dumanoglu, A. A. (2017). Wave-passage effect on the seismic response of suspension bridges considering local soil conditions. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(2), 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adanur, S., Altunisik, A. C., Soyluk, K., Bayraktar, A., & Dumanoglu, A. A. (2016). Multiple-support seismic response of bosporus suspension bridge for various random vibration methods. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 5, 5–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, S. H., Nehdi, M., & Youssef, M. A. (2009). Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Structures and Systems, 5(5), 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CALTRANS. (1990). Bridge design specification manual. California Department of Transportation.

  • Caterino, N., Maddaloni, G., & Occhiuzzi, A. (2014). Damage analysis and seismic retrofitting of a continuous prestresses reinforced concrete bridge. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 2, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Duan, L. (2003). Brige engineering seismic design. Cambridge: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E. (2002). Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges. Ph.D. Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

  • Choi, G. (2016). Development of a smart damper by combining friction of magnets and self-centering of pre-compressed rubber springs. M.S. Thesis, Hongik Univeresity, Seoul.

  • Choi, E., Choi, G., Kim, H., & Youn, H. (2015). Smart damper using the combination of magnetic friction and pre-compressed rubber springs. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 351, 68–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Kim, D. J., Lee, J. H., & Ryu, G. S. (2017). Monotonic and hysteretic pullout behavior of superelastic SMA fibers with different anchorages. Composites: Part B, 108, 232–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Lee, D. H., & Choei, N. Y. (2009). Shape memory alloy bending bars as seismic restrainers for bridges in seismic areas. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9(4), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2018). A new experimental investigation into the effects of reinforcing mortar beams with superelastic SMA fibers on controlling and closing cracks. Composites: Part B, 137, 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Park, S., Yoon, D., & Park, C. (2010). Comparison of seismic performance of three restrainers for multiple-span bridges using fragility analysis. Nonlinear Dynamics, 61(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copper, J., Friedland, I., Buckle, I., Nimis, R., & Bob, N. (1994). The Northridge earthquake: progress made, lessons learned in seismic-resistant bridge design. Public Roads, 58, 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, A., Marano, G. C., Greco, R., & Mastromarino, E. (2016). Structural optimization of hollow-section steel trusses by differential evolution algorithm. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(2), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemieh, M., Bahaari, M. R., Ghodratian, S. M., & Nojoumi, S. A. (2012). Improvement of concrete shear wall structures by smart materials. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. H., Cho, H. N., Cho, T. J., Shin, S. W., & Kim, T. S. (2010). Risk assessments of long-span bridges considering life-cycle cost concept and near-fault ground motion effect. International Journal of Steel Structures, 10(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS. (1997). Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Federal emergency management agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedayati Dezfuli, F., Li, S., Alam, M. S., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). Effect of constitutive models on the seismic response of an SMA-LRB isolated highway bridge. Engineering Structures, 148, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isalgue, A., Lovey, F. C., Terriault, P., Martorell, F., Torra, R. M., & Torra, V. (2006). SMA for dampers in civil engineering. Materials Transactions, 47(3), 682–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, J., Shafieezadeh, A., Lee, D., Choi, E., & DesRoches, R. (2015). Damage assessment of older highway bridges subjected to three-dimensional ground motions: Characterization of shear-axial force interaction on seismic fragilities. Engineering Structures, 87, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Su, Q., Han, X., Shao, C., & Chen, L. (2017). Experimental study and numerical analysis on mechanical behavior of T-shape stiffened orthotropic steel-concrete composite bridge decks. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(3), 893–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasano, H., Yoda, T., Nogami, K., Murakoshi, J., Toyama, N., Sawada, M., et al. (2012). Study on failure modes of steel truss bridge gusset plates related to tension and shear block failure. International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(3), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, J., Becker, V., & Wagner, W. (2017). Gradient enhancement of a transversely isotropic continuum damage model. Composite Structures, 181, 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W., Kim, S. H., & Mha, H. S. (2004). Seismic retrofit prioritization of bridges based on damage risk and failure cost analysis. In 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouare, Canada.

  • Mangalathu, S., Heo, G., & Jeon, J. S. (2018). Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes. Engineering Structures, 162, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, R. (1993). Response of isolated structures to recent California earthquakes. In Structural engineering in natural hazards mitigation, ASCE, New York, NY.

  • Mitchell, D., Bruneau, M., Williams, M., Anderson, D., Saatcloglu, M., & Robert, S. (1995). Performance of bridges in the 1994 northridge earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2014). Investigation into central-difference and Newmark’s beta method in measuring dynamic responses. Advanced Materials Research, 831, 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2015). Numerical analysis of dynamic responses of the plate subjected to impulsive loads. International journal of Civil, Environmental, Structureal, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(9), 1148–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2017). Analytical method to investigate nonlinear dynamic responses of sandwich plates with FGM faces resting on elastic foundation considering blast loads. Composite Structures, 174, 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntasir Billah, A. H. M., & Sharia Alam, M. (2016). Plastic hinge of shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced concrete bridge pier. Engineering Structures, 117, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, B., & DesRoches, R. (2007). Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(6), 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Joe, W., Park, J., Hwang, M., & Choi, B. H. (2012). An experimental study on after-fracture redundancy of continuous span two-girder bridges. International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Fatigue life assessment for a composite box girder bridge. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14(4), 543–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quanani, M., & Tiliouine, B. (2017). Progressive seismic failure of a highway bridge including abutment-backfill interaction. Current Science, 112(2), 335–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, F. M., Wipe, T. J., Klaiber, F. W., & Paradis, R. (2000). Evaluation and repair of damaged prestressed concrete girder bridges. In Mid-continent transportation symposium proceedings.

  • Saiidi, M., Maragakis, E., & O’Connor, D. (1995). Seismic performance of the Madrone bridge during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Structural Engineering Review, 7(3), 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J., & Rogers, L. P. (2017). Comparison of curved prestressed concrete bridge population response between area and spine modeling approaches toward efficient seismic vulnerability analysis. Engineering Structures, 150, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, B., Hao, H., & Bi, K. (2013). Pounding and unseating damage mitigation on bridge structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions using restrainers rubber bumpers. In Conference of Australian earthquake engineering society, Tasamania, Nov. 15–17.

  • Zheng, Y., Dong, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Project No. 2015-041523). This study was also supported by 2018 research fund of Hongik University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Su Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, E., Jeon, JS., Kim, W.J. et al. Investigation of MRS and SMA Dampers Effects on Bridge Seismic Resistance Employing Analytical Models. Int J Steel Struct 18, 1325–1335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0125-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0125-8

Keywords

Navigation