International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1139–1152 | Cite as

Investigation on Ultimate Strength of STS304L Stainless Steel Welded Connection with Base Metal Fracture Using Finite Element Analysis

  • HooChang Lee
  • TaeSoo KimEmail author
  • BoKyung Hwang
  • TaeJun Cho


Many studies on the application of stainless steels as structural materials in buildings and infra-structures have been performed thanks to superior characteristics of corrosion resistance, fire resistance and aesthetic appeal. Experimental investigation to estimate the ultimate strength and fracture mode of the fillet-welded connections of cold-formed austenitic stainless steel (STS304L) with better intergranular corrosion resistance than that of austenitic stainless steel, STS304 commonly used has carried out by authors. Specimens were fabricated to fail by base metal fracture not weld metal fracture with main variables of weld lengths according to loading direction. All specimens showed a block shear fracture mode. In this paper, finite element analysis model was developed to predict the ultimate behaviors of welded connection and its validity was verified through the comparison with test results. Since the block shear behavior of welded connection due to stress triaxiality and shear-lag effects is different from that of bolted connection, stress and strain distributions in the critical path of tensile and shear fracture section were investigated. Test and analysis strengths were compared with those by current design specifications such as AISC, EC3 and existing researcher’s proposed equations. In addition, through parametric analysis with extended variables, the conditions of end distance and longitudinal weld length for block shear fracture and tensile fracture were suggested.


Austenitic stainless steel Base metal fracture Welding direction Weld length Design code 



This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (KRF-2015R1D1A3A01016603) and the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (No. 20184030201900).


  1. ABAQUS, Ver.6.4. (2003). Analysis user’s manual. ABAQUS Inc. Pawtucket, 18-4, USA.Google Scholar
  2. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2010). Manual of steel construction-load and resistance factor design. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
  3. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2016). Standard specification for chromium and chromium–nickel stainless steel plate, sheet, and strip for pressure vessels and for general applications, ASTM A240/A240M-16. Pennsylvania: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
  4. American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM). (2015). Standard specification for annealed or cold-worked austenitic stainless steel sheet, strip, plate, and flat bar, ASTM A666/A666M–15. Pennsylvania: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
  5. American Welding Society (AWS). (2012). Specification for bare stainless steel welding electrodes and rods (A5.9). Miami: American Welding Society.Google Scholar
  6. European Standard Norme Europeenne, Europaische Norm (EN). (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structuresPart 18: Design of joints, EN1993-1-8.Google Scholar
  7. Hwang, B. K., Lee, H. C., & Kim, T. S. (2017). An experimental study on block shear strength of austenitic stainless steel (STS304) fillet-welded connection. Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 29(9), 31–38. (In Korean).Google Scholar
  8. Japan Industrial Standards (JIS). (2000). Stainless steel for building structure, JIS G 4321. Japan: Tokyo.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, T. S., Kim, M. S., & Cho, T. J. (2018). Parametric study on ultimate strength of four-bolted connections with cold-formed carbon steel. International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, T. S., & Kuwamura, H. (2007). Finite element modeling of bolted connections in thin-walled stainless steel plates under static shear. Thin-Walled Structures, 45, 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Korean Standard (KS). (2010). Stainless steel welding rods and wires, KS D 7026. Korea: Seoul.Google Scholar
  12. Korean Standard (KS). (2015). Cold rolled stainless steel plates, sheets and strip, KS D 3698. Korea: Seoul.Google Scholar
  13. Kulak, G. L., & Grondin, G. Y. (2001). Block shear failure in steel members—A review of design practice. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 38(4), 199–203.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, H. C., Hwang, B. K., & Kim, T. S. (2017). Ultimate strength of austenitic stainless steel fillet-welded connections with weld metal fracture. Thin-Walled Structures, 116, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oosterhof, S. A., & Driver, R. G. (2010). Effects of connection geometry on block shear failure of welded lap plate connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67, 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Topkaya, C. A. (2004). Finite element parametric study on block shear failure of steel tension members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60, 1615–1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Topkaya, C. A. (2007). Block shear failure of gusset plates with welded connection. Engineering Structures, 29(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringHanbat National UniversityDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringDaejin UniversityPocheonKorea

Personalised recommendations