Investigation on Ultimate Strength of STS304L Stainless Steel Welded Connection with Base Metal Fracture Using Finite Element Analysis
- 69 Downloads
Many studies on the application of stainless steels as structural materials in buildings and infra-structures have been performed thanks to superior characteristics of corrosion resistance, fire resistance and aesthetic appeal. Experimental investigation to estimate the ultimate strength and fracture mode of the fillet-welded connections of cold-formed austenitic stainless steel (STS304L) with better intergranular corrosion resistance than that of austenitic stainless steel, STS304 commonly used has carried out by authors. Specimens were fabricated to fail by base metal fracture not weld metal fracture with main variables of weld lengths according to loading direction. All specimens showed a block shear fracture mode. In this paper, finite element analysis model was developed to predict the ultimate behaviors of welded connection and its validity was verified through the comparison with test results. Since the block shear behavior of welded connection due to stress triaxiality and shear-lag effects is different from that of bolted connection, stress and strain distributions in the critical path of tensile and shear fracture section were investigated. Test and analysis strengths were compared with those by current design specifications such as AISC, EC3 and existing researcher’s proposed equations. In addition, through parametric analysis with extended variables, the conditions of end distance and longitudinal weld length for block shear fracture and tensile fracture were suggested.
KeywordsAustenitic stainless steel Base metal fracture Welding direction Weld length Design code
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (KRF-2015R1D1A3A01016603) and the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (No. 20184030201900).
- ABAQUS, Ver.6.4. (2003). Analysis user’s manual. ABAQUS Inc. Pawtucket, 18-4, USA.Google Scholar
- American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2010). Manual of steel construction-load and resistance factor design. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2016). Standard specification for chromium and chromium–nickel stainless steel plate, sheet, and strip for pressure vessels and for general applications, ASTM A240/A240M-16. Pennsylvania: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
- American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM). (2015). Standard specification for annealed or cold-worked austenitic stainless steel sheet, strip, plate, and flat bar, ASTM A666/A666M–15. Pennsylvania: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
- American Welding Society (AWS). (2012). Specification for bare stainless steel welding electrodes and rods (A5.9). Miami: American Welding Society.Google Scholar
- European Standard Norme Europeenne, Europaische Norm (EN). (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1–8: Design of joints, EN1993-1-8.Google Scholar
- Hwang, B. K., Lee, H. C., & Kim, T. S. (2017). An experimental study on block shear strength of austenitic stainless steel (STS304) fillet-welded connection. Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 29(9), 31–38. (In Korean).Google Scholar
- Japan Industrial Standards (JIS). (2000). Stainless steel for building structure, JIS G 4321. Japan: Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Korean Standard (KS). (2010). Stainless steel welding rods and wires, KS D 7026. Korea: Seoul.Google Scholar
- Korean Standard (KS). (2015). Cold rolled stainless steel plates, sheets and strip, KS D 3698. Korea: Seoul.Google Scholar
- Kulak, G. L., & Grondin, G. Y. (2001). Block shear failure in steel members—A review of design practice. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 38(4), 199–203.Google Scholar