Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1125–1138 | Cite as

Computationally Efficient and Accurate Simulation of Cyclic Behavior for Rectangular HSS Braces

  • Chang Seok Lee
  • Min Soo Sung
  • Sang Whan HanEmail author
  • Hyun Woo Jee
Article
  • 162 Downloads

Abstract

During earthquakes, braces behave in complex manners because of the asymmetric response nature of their responses in tension and compression. Hollow structural sections (HSS) have been popularly used for braces due to their sectional efficiency in compression. The purpose of this study is to accurately simulate the cyclic behavior of rectangular HSS braces using a computationally efficient numerical model. A conceptually efficient and simple physical theory model is used as a basis model. To improve the accuracy of the model, cyclic beam growth and buckling load, as well as the incidences of local buckling and brace fracture are estimated using empirical equations obtained from regression analyses using test data on rectangular HSS braces. The accuracy of the proposed model is verified by comparing actual and simulated cyclic curves of brace specimens with various slenderness and width-to-thickness ratios.

Keywords

Cyclic behavior Brace Numerical model Hollow structural section Local buckling Fracture Regression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the financial supports provided by National Research Foundation of Korea (No. 2017R1A2B3008937).

References

  1. AISC. (2001). Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings (3rd ed.). Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
  2. AISC. (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, ANSI/AISC 341-16.Google Scholar
  3. Alipour, M., & Aghakouchak, A. (2013). Numerical analysis of the nonlinear performance of concentrically braced frames under cyclic loading. International Journal of Steel Structures, 13(3), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASCE 7. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston: ASCE 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  5. Azad, S. K., Topkaya, C., & Bybordiani, M. (2018). Dynamic buckling of braces in concentrically braced frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47, 613–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, R. G., Wenger, W. A., & Popov, E. P. (1980). Inelastic buckling of steel strut under cyclic load reversals. Report No. UCB/EERC-80/40, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Bruneau, M., Uang, C. M., & Whittaker, A. (2011). Ductile design of steel structures. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Dicleli, M., & Calik, E. E. (2008). Physical theory hysteretic model for steel braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(7), 1215–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding, Z., Fouthch, D. A., & Han, S. W. (2008). Fracture modeling of rectangular hollow section steel braces. Engineering Journal, 45(3), 171–185.Google Scholar
  10. Fell, B. V., Kanvinde, A. M., Deierlein, G. G., & Myers, A. T. (2009). Experimental investigation of inelastic cyclic buckling and fracture of steel braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gogginsa, J. M., Brodericka, B. M., Elghazoulib, A. Y., & Lucasa, A. S. (2005). Experimental cyclic response of cold-formed hollow steel bracing members. Engineering Structures, 27(7), 977–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han, S. W., Kim, W. T., & Foutch, D. A. (2007a). Seismic behavior of HSS bracing members according to width-thickness ratio under symmetric cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133, 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han, S. W., Kim, W. T., & Foutch, D. A. (2007b). Tensile strength equation for HSS bracing members having slotted end connections. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 995–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikeda, K., & Mahin, S. A. (1984). A refined physical theory model for predicting the seismic behavior of braced steel frames. Report No. UCB/EERC-84/12. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  15. Jain, A. K., & Goel, S. C. (1978). Hysteresis models for steel members subjected to cyclic buckling or cyclic end moments and bucklingUser’s guide for DRAIN-2D: EL9 and EL10. Report No. UMEE 78R6. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  16. Jin, J., & El-Tawil, S. (2003). Inelastic cyclic model for steel braces. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 129(5), 548–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kayvani, K., & Barzegar, F. (1996). Hysteretic modeling of tubular members and offshore platforms. Engineering Structures, 18(2), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, K. (2003). Seismic vulnerability evaluation of axially loaded steel build-up laced members. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, S. S., & Goel, S. C. (1987). Seismic behavior of hollow and concrete-filled square tubular bracing members. Report No. UMCE 87-11. Department of Civil Eng., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, Y. J., Oh, J., Abdu, H. H., & Ju, Y. K. (2016). Finite element analysis of optimized brace angle for the diagrid structural system. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(4), 1355–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maison, B. F., & Popov, E. P. (1980). Cyclic response prediction for braced steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 106(7), 1401–1416.Google Scholar
  22. Mazzolani, F. M., & Gioncu, V. (2000). Seismic resistant steel structures (Vol. 420). New York: CISM International Centre for Mechanical Science. Courses and lectures, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nip, K. H., Gardner, L., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2010). Cyclic testing and numerical modelling of carbon steel and stainless steel tubular bracing members. Engineering Structures, 32(2), 424–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seo, A., Moon, K. H., & Han, S. W. (2010). Fracture prediction due to local buckling in bracing members. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea (AIK), 26(12), 91–98.Google Scholar
  25. Shaback, J. B. (2001). Behavior of square HSS braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading. Master thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary.Google Scholar
  26. Shaback, J. B., & Brown, T. (2003). Behaviour of square hollow structural steel braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30(4), 745–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soroushian, P., & Alawa, M. S. (1990). Hysteretic modeling of steel struts: Refined physical theory approach. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(11), 2903–2916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tremblay, R., Archambault, M. H., & Filiatrault, A. (2003). Seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames made with rectangular hollow bracing members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 1626–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uriz, P. (2005). Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations