Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1098–1106 | Cite as

Examination on Fatigue Limit and Crack Growth Characteristic of SBHS700 Base Metal

  • Yuki OnoEmail author
  • Koji Kinoshita
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The object of this study is to clarify fatigue limit and fatigue crack growth characteristic of SBHS700 base metal which is 780 MPa class steel. This study carried out the fatigue tests of SBHS700 base metal containing different defect size, and the fatigue limit was compared with that of the conventional steel. Test results indicate that the fatigue limit increased with decrease initial defect size, and can be precisely evaluated by using \(\sqrt {area}\) parameter model. This paper also presents that crack growth characteristic was almost the same as that of the conventional steel from the observation of striations by using Scanning electron microscope and length of beach marks.

Keywords

SBHS Fatigue limit Base metal Scanning electron microscope Striation 

References

  1. Anami, K., Miki, C., Yamamoto, H., & Higuchi, Y. (2000). Fatigue strength of welded joint made of high strength steel and fatigue strength improvement. Journal of JSCE, 675/I-55, 251–260 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  2. Gunther, H.-P. (Ed.). (2005). Use and application of high-performance steels for steel structures. In IABSE-AIPC-IVBH, structural engineering documents (Vol. 8).Google Scholar
  3. Hanji, T., & Anami, K. (2017). Influence of static strength of steels on fatigue strength improvement of welded joints by toe treatment. Journal of Structural Engineering, 63A, 646–658 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  4. Hanji, T., Kazuo, T., Shuichi, O., & Danshita, Y. (2014). Fatigue strength of welded joints using steels for bridge high performance structures (SBHS). Steel Structural Engineering, 60A, 587–595 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  5. Ishida, S., Tokumasu, M., Nakasa, K., & Ishihara, H. (1990). Evaluation of actual fatigue stress by using striation spacing and hardness. The Society of Materials Science, Japan, 39, 63–69 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Japanese Society of Steel Construction. (2012). Fatigue design recommendations for steel structures. Gihodo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  7. Kakiuchi, Y., Tanaka, M., Akiyama, E., & Kondou, T. (1983). An Interpretation of the Scatter in fatigue striation spacing for an aluminum alloy and a mild steel. Mechanical Engineers, 42, 3669–3678 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  8. Konishi, T., Takahashi, K., & Miki, C. (2007). Application of high strength steel on steel bridge and its effects on weight reduction. Journal of JSCE, 654/I-52, 91–103 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  9. Matsunaga, H., Murakami, Y., Kubota, M., & Lee, J. (2003). Fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4 V alloys containing small artificial defects. Materials Science Research International, 9(4), 263–269.Google Scholar
  10. Miki, C., & Tai, M. (2013). Fatigue strength improvement of out-of-plane welded joints of steel girder under variable amplitude loading. Welding in the World, 57, 823–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mori, T., Shimanuki, H., & Tanaka, M. (2010). Influence of steel static strength on fatigue strength of web-gusset welded joints with UIT. Journal of the Japan Welding Society, 70(2), 210–220 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Murakami, Y. (1989). Effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions on the fatigue strength of metals. JSME International Journal, Series I, 32(2), 167–180.Google Scholar
  13. Murakami, Y. (1993). Metal fatigue: Effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions. Tokyo: YOKENDO Ltd (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. Murakami, Y., Machida, H., Susumu, M., & Takagi, T. (2017). A new quality control method based on statistics of extremes for preventing recalls for mass production products. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering, 83(853), 1–16 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  15. Newman, J.C., Raju, I.S. (1984). Stress-intensity factor for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads. Nasa Technical Memorandum, TM-85793, 1–39.Google Scholar
  16. Ono, Y., & Kinoshita, K. (2017). Fatigue strength and crack growth characteristic of SBHS700 base metal. Proceedings of Constructional Steel, 25(93), 648–652 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Shimanuki, H. (2016). Factors affecting fatigue life extension by ultrasonic impact treatment in welded joints. Journal of Japan Welding Society, 85(2), 198–206 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. The Society of Materials Science Japan. (2000). Fractography: Fracture surface and fracture information analysis. Tokyo: Maruzen (in Japanese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringGifu UniversityGifuJapan

Personalised recommendations