Conserving biodiversity is critical to the sustainability of human settlements, and stands to benefit from collaboration between ecologists focused on understanding natural systems and planners balancing social, environmental, and economic priorities. Drawing from the socially-situated definition of ‘sustainability’, we sought to understand the relationship between ecologists and planners by probing how planners in the southeastern US prioritize and engage with biodiversity conservation and ecological information, and how context influences these decisions. We find that context matters, e.g., higher jurisdictional population density was positively associated with prioritizing tree cover and diversity. We find, also, that while biodiversity conservation and ecological information are valuable to planners, planners rely heavily on their colleagues to inform conservation-related activities and prioritize conservation topics that differ from ecological research foci. Improved communication by ecologists and context-specific transdisciplinary sustainability research, especially that which incorporates the primary role of elected officials in biodiversity conservation, may help to integrate ecological science and planning practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adams, W.M., and C. Sandbrook. 2013. Conservation, evidence and policy. Oryx 47: 329–335.
Ahern, J. 2013. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology 28: 1203–1212.
Azerrad, J.M., and C.H. Nilon. 2006. An evaluation of agency conservation guidelines to better address planning efforts by local government. Landscape and Urban Planning 77: 255–262.
Baillie, J.E.M., J. Griffiths, S.T. Turvey, J. Loh, and B. Collen. 2010. Evolution lost: Status and trends of the world’s vertebrates. London: Zoological Society of London.
Beatley, T. 2000. Preserving biodiversity: Challenges for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 66: 5–20.
Boyer, R., N. Peterson, P. Arora, and K. Caldwell. 2016. Five approaches to social sustainability and an integrated way forward. Sustainability 8: 878.
Broberg, L. 2003. Conserving ecosystems locally: A role for ecologists in land use planning. BioScience 53: 670–673.
Brody, S.D. 2003. Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local land use planning. Population and Environment 24: 511–540.
Brummitt, N.A., S.P. Bachman, J. Griffiths-Lee, M. Lutz, J.F. Moat, A. Farjon, J.S. Donaldson, C. Hilton-Taylor, et al. 2015. Green plants in the red: A baseline global assessment for the IUCN Sampled Red List Index for plants. PLoS ONE 10: 8.
Burby, R.J. 2003. Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association 69: 33–49.
Campbell, S. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association 62: 296–312.
Campbell, L.K., E.S. Svendsen, and L.A. Roman. 2016. Knowledge co-production at the research-practice interface: Embedded case studies from urban forestry. Environmental Management 57: 1262–1280.
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
Collen, B., M. Böhm, R. Kemp, and J.E.M. Baillie. 2012. Spineless: Status and trends of the world’s invertebrates. London: Zoological Society of London.
Cook, C.N., M.B. Mascia, M.W. Schwartz, H.P. Possingham, and R.A. Fuller. 2013. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conservation Biology 27: 669–678.
Daly, H.E. 1996. Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable environment. Boston: Beacon Press.
Dormann, C.F., J. Elith, S. Bacher, C. Buchmann, G. Carl, G. Carré, J.R. García-Marquéz, B. Gruber, et al. 2013. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36: 27–46.
Duerksen, C.J., D.L. Elliott, N.T. Hobbs, E. Johnson, and J.R. Miller. 1997. Habitat protection planning: Where the wild things are. American Planning Association, Report 470/471, Washington, D.C., USA.
Enquist, C.A.F., S.T. Jackson, G.M. Garfin, F.W. Davis, L.R. Gerber, J.A. Littell, J.L. Tank, A.J. Terando, et al. 2017. Foundations of translational ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15: 541–550.
ESRI. 2015. ArcGIS desktop: Release 104. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Frick, K.T., D. Weinzimmer, and P. Waddell. 2015. The politics of sustainable development opposition: State legislative efforts to stop the United Nation’s Agenda 21 in the United States. Urban Studies 52: 209–232.
Gagné, S.A., F. Eigenbrod, D.G. Bert, G.M. Cunnington, L.T. Olson, A.C. Smith, and L. Fahrig. 2015. A simple landscape design framework for biodiversity conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 136: 13–27.
Graversgaard, M., B.H. Jacobsen, C. Kjeldsen, and T. Dalgaard. 2017. Stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-creation in water planning: Can public participation increase cost effectiveness? Water 9: 191.
Hallmann, C.A., M. Sorg, E. Jongejans, H. Siepel, N. Hofland, H. Schwan, W. Stenmans, A. Müller, et al. 2017. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12: 10.
Hawkins, C.V. 2011. Smart Growth policy choice: A resource dependency and local governance explanation. Policy Studies Journal 39: 679–707.
Head, B.W., and W.N. Xiang. 2016. Why is an APT approach to wicked problems important? Landscape and Urban Planning 154: 4–7.
Hill, E., J.H. Dorfman, and E. Kramer. 2010. Evaluating the impact of government land use policies on tree canopy coverage. Land Use Policy 27: 407–414.
Homer, C.G., J.A. Dewitz, L. Yang, S. Jin, P. Danielson, G. Xian, J. Coulston, N. Herold, et al. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States: Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 81: 345–354.
Hurley, P.T., and P.A. Walker. 2004. Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A 36: 1529–1547.
IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved 29 July, 2019, from https://www.iucnredlist.org/.
Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. New York: Earthscan.
Joppa, L.N., B. O’Connor, P. Visconti, C. Smith, J. Geldmann, M. Hoffmann, J.E.M. Watson, S.H.M. Butchart, et al. 2016. Filling in biodiversity threat gaps. Science 352: 416–418.
Kidd, C. 1992. The evolution of sustainability. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5: 1–26.
Leonard, P.B., R.W. Sutherland, R.F. Baldwin, D.A. Fedak, R.G. Carnes, and A.P. Montgomery. 2017. Landscape connectivity losses due to sea level rise and land use change. Animal Conservation 20: 80–90.
Martinuzzi, S., J.C. Withey, A.M. Pidgeon, A.J. Plantinga, A.J. McKerrow, S.G. Williams, D.P. Helmers, and V.C. Radeloff. 2015. Future land-use scenarios and the loss of wildlife habitats in the southeastern United States. Ecological Applications 25: 160–171.
Mauser, W., G. Klepper, M. Rice, B.S. Schmalzbauer, H. Hackmann, R. Leemans, and H. Moore. 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5: 420–431.
McDonough, W., and M. Braungart. 2002. Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
McNie, E.C. 2007. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: An analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy 10: 17–38.
Meadow, A.M., D.B. Ferguson, Z. Guido, A. Horangic, G. Owen, and T. Wall. 2015. Moving toward the deliberate coproduction of climate science knowledge. Weather Climate and Society 7: 179–191.
Miller, J.R., M. Groom, G.R. Hess, T. Steelman, D.L. Stokes, J. Thompson, T. Bowman, L. Fricke, et al. 2009. Biodiversity conservation in local planning. Conservation Biology 23: 53–63.
Nassauer, J.I., and P. Opdam. 2008. Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology 23: 633–644.
Nel, J.L., D.J. Roux, A. Driver, L. Hill, A.C. Maherry, K. Snaddon, C.R. Petersen, L.B. Smith- Adao, et al. 2016. Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology 30: 176–188.
OECD. 2017. Land-use planning systems in the OECD: Country fact sheets. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Orr, D.W. 2011. Two meanings of sustainability (1988). In Hope is an imperative, ed. D.W. Orr, 93–111. Washington: Island Press.
Pimm, S.L., C.N. Jenkins, R. Abell, T.M. Brooks, J.L. Gittleman, L.N. Joppa, P.H. Raven, C.M. Roberts, et al. 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344: 1246752.
Portney, K.E. 2013. Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Pullin, A.S., T.M. Knight, D.A. Stone, and K. Charman. 2004. Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation 119: 245–252.
Qualtrics. 2017. Qualtrics software, version 2017. Provo: Qualtrics.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rees, W.E. 1995. Achieving sustainability: Reform or transformation? Journal of Planning Literature 9: 343–361.
Robinson, J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48: 369–384.
Rosenberg, K.V., J.A. Kennedy, R. Dettmers, R.P. Ford, D. Reynolds, J.D. Alexander, C.J. Beardmore, P.J. Blancher, et al. 2016. Partners in Flight landbird conservation plan: 2016 revision for Canada and continental United States. Partners in Flight Science Committee.
Saha, D., and R.G. Paterson. 2008. Local government efforts to promote the “Three Es” of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 21–37.
Sandström, U.G., P. Angelstam, and A. Khakee. 2006. Urban comprehensive planning: Identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landscape and Urban Planning 75: 43–57.
Schwartz, K.Z.S. 2013. Panther politics: Neoliberalizing nature in Southwest Florida. Environment and Planning A 45: 2323–2343.
Steelman, T.A., and G.R. Hess. 2009. Effective protection of open space: Does planning matter? Environmental Management 44: 93–104.
Steiner, F. 2016. Opportunities for urban ecology in community and regional planning. Journal of Urban Ecology 2: juv004.
Stokes, D.L., M.F. Hanson, D.D. Oaks, J.E. Straub, and A.V. Ponio. 2010. Local land-use planning to conserve biodiversity: Planners’ perspectives on what works. Conservation Biology 24: 450–460.
Stokols, D. 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology 38: 79–93.
Tan, K.W. 2006. A greenway network for Singapore. Landscape and Urban Planning 76: 45–66.
US Census Bureau. 2016. 2012–2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Retrieved 1 April, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/american-factfinder/.
US Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Program (GAP). 2016. Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US), version 1.4 Combined Feature Class. Retrieved 1 April, 2018, from https://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/download/.
Walsh, J.C., L.V. Dicks, and W.J. Sutherland. 2015. The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions. Conservation Biology 29: 88–98.
Webler, T., S. Tuler, I. Shockey, P. Stern, and R. Beattie. 2003. Participation by local governmental officials in watershed management planning. Society & Natural Resources 16: 105–121.
Wickson, F., A.L. Carew, and A.W. Russell. 2006. Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries, and quality. Futures 38: 1046–1059.
World Commission on the Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
WWF. 2016. Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era. Gland: WWF International.
Yli-Pelkonen, V., and J. Niemelä. 2006. Use of ecological information in urban planning: Experiences from the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Urban Ecosystems 9: 211–226.
This research was made possible by a University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte Research Scholars award to KBS. We profusely thank the planners who took time out of their busy schedules to answer our survey questions. We also thank the reviewers of our manuscript whose comments have significantly improved our work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Gagné, S.A., Bryan-Scaggs, K., Boyer, R.H.W. et al. Conserving biodiversity takes a plan: How planners implement ecological information for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 49, 1490–1505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01281-z
- Conservation policy
- Ecological guidelines
- Land use planning
- Socio-ecological systems