Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 711–720 | Cite as

The monkey is not always a God: Attitudinal differences toward crop-raiding macaques and why it matters for conflict mitigation

  • Shaurabh Anand
  • Vilakkathala Vijayan Binoy
  • Sindhu Radhakrishna
Research Article

Abstract

Attitudinal differences toward wildlife have important implications for conflict management and when the species in question have strong cultural and religious associations, conflict mitigation becomes a challenging endeavor. We investigated farmers’ attitudes toward two different crop-raiding macaque species, the rhesus macaque in northern India, and the bonnet macaque in southern India. Apart from regional differences in attitudes, we also assessed temporal changes in attitude toward the rhesus macaque. We carried out household surveys using a semistructured questionnaire to collect data. Our findings reveal that respondents in southern and northern India differ significantly in their views regarding species sanctity and preference for mitigation options. Although people’s perceptions of the rhesus macaques had changed over time in northern India, farmers were still unwilling to cause harm to the macaques. We discuss the underlying causes of these observed differences in attitude and their impact on the management of human–macaque conflict.

Keywords

Bonnet macaque (Macaca radiataConflict India Management Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Vijay Rajput, Sumith Lal, and Girija for their assistance in the field. They would also like to thank Neha Lakhani for insightful discussions on the subject matter of the manuscript. Shaurabh Anand was supported by an institutional fellowship during the course of this study.

Supplementary material

13280_2017_1008_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (45 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 46 kb)

References

  1. Anand, S., and S. Radhakrishna. 2017. Investigating trends in human–wildlife conflict: Is conflict escalation real or imagined? Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 10: 154–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2017.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch-Mordo, S., S.W. Breck, K.R. Wilson, and J. Broderick. 2009. A tool box half full: How social science can help solve human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 219–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200902839324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisht, G. 2017. Monkeys again declared vermin in Shimla. Hindustan Times, March 22.Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, E.J., J.G. Else, and J. Altmann. 1985. Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: Vervet monkeys in a tourist-lodge habitat. African Journal of Ecology 23: 35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1985.tb00710.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell-Smith, G., H.V.P. Simanjorang, N. Leader-Williams, and M. Linkie. 2010. Local attitudes and perceptions toward crop-raiding by orangutans (Pongo abelii) and other nonhuman primates in Northern Sumatra, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology 72: 866–876.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Census of India. 2011. Primary Census Abstract Data Tables - Himachal Pradesh. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  7. Dandy, N., S. Ballantyne, D. Moseley, R. Gill, A. Peace, and C. Quine. 2011. Preferences for wildlife management methods among the peri-urban public in Scotland. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57: 1213–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0534-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernando, P., E. Wikramanayake, D. Weerakoon, L.K.A. Jayasinghe, M. Gunawardene, and H.K. Janaka. 2005. Perceptions and patterns of human–elephant conflict in old and new settlements in Sri Lanka: Insights for mitigation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2465–2481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0216-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fooden, J. 2000. Systematic review of the Rhesus Macaque, Macaca mulatta (Zimmerman, 1780). Fieldiana Zoology 96: 1–192.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7192.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, J.R. 1999. Gods, groves and the culture of nature in Kerala. Modern Asian Studies 33, 257–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Himachal Pradesh Forest Department. 2016. Order for payment of incentive for killing of monkeys. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://hpforest.nic.in/files/orderforpaymentofincentiveforkillingofmonkey.pdf.
  12. Indian Express. 2017. Soon, special task force to cull vermin monkeys in Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from http://indianexpress.com/article/india/soon-special-task-force-to-cull-vermin-monkeys-in-himachal-pradesh-4608168/.
  13. Jardhari, V., P. Rao, and A. Choudhary. 2008. Crop damage by wildlife in a Garhwal Himalayan village. Pune: Kalpvriksha.Google Scholar
  14. Jayson, E. A. 1998. Studies of Man-Wildlife Conflict in Peppara Wildlife Sanctuary And Adjacent Areas. KFRI Research Report No 140:1-71.Google Scholar
  15. Jayson, E. A. 1999. Studies on crop damage by wild animals in Kerala and evaluation of control measures. KFRI Research Report No. 169: 1–48.Google Scholar
  16. Kansky, R., and A.T. Knight. 2014. Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans. Biological Conservation.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.008.Google Scholar
  17. Knight, J. 1999. Monkeys on the Move: The Natural Symbolism of People-Macaque Conflict in Japan. Journal of Asian Studies 58: 622–647.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2659114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, J. 2000. Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kruse, C.K., and J.A. Card. 2004. Effects of a Conservation Education Camp Program on Campers’ self-reported knowledge, attitude, and behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education 35: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, T.M., N.S. Sodhi, and D.M. Prawiradilaga. 2009. Determinants of local people’s attitude toward conservation and the consequential effects on illegal resource harvesting in the protected areas of Sulawesi (Indonesia). Environmental Conservation 36: 157–170.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892909990178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madden, F. 2004. Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: Global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 247–257.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200490505675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malone, N., A.H. Wade, A. Fuentes, E.P. Riley, M. Remis, and C.J. Robinson. 2014. Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinarity and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology 34: 8–29.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X13510188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manfredo, M.J., and A.A. Dayer. 2004. Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human–wildlife conflict in a global context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200490505765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marchal, V., and C. Hill. 2009. Primate crop-raiding: a study of local perceptions in four villages in north Sumatra, Indonesia. Primate Conservation 24: 107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1896/052.024.0109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mateo-Tomás, P., P.P. Olea, I.S. Sánchez-Barbudo, and R. Mateo. 2012. Alleviating human–wildlife conflicts: Identifying the causes and mapping the risk of illegal poisoning of wild fauna. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 376–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McLennan, M.R. 2008. Beleaguered chimpanzees in the Agricultural District of Hoima, Western Uganda. Primate Conservation 23: 45–54.  https://doi.org/10.1896/052.023.0105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, K., and D. Jones. 2006. Gender differences in the perceptions of wildlife management objectives and priorities in Australasia. Wildlife Research 33: 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change. 2016. Gazette Notification No. S.O. 1922 (E) dated 26.05.2016 regarding listing of Rhesus Macaque in Schedule-V of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 in the State of Himachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
  29. Mishra, C. 1997. Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environmental Conservation 24: 338–343.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Naughton-Treves, L., and A. Treves. 2005. Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: Crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. In People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence, ed. R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz, 253–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nyhus, P.J., H. Fischer, F. Madden, and S. Osofsky. 2003. Taking the bite out of wildlife damage: The challenges of wildlife compensation schemes. Conservation in Practice 4: 37–40.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4629.2003.tb00061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ogra, M.V. 2008. Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum 39: 1408–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pirta, R.S., M. Gadgil, and A. Kharshikar. 1997. Management of the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta and Hanuman langur Presbytis entellus in Himachal Pradesh, India. Biological Conservation 79: 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Radhakrishna, S. 2013. Songs of monkeys: representation of macaques in classical Tamil poetry. In The Macaque Connection: Cooperation and conflict between humans and macaques, ed. S. Radhakrishna, M. A. Huffman, and A. Sinha, 53–68. Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  35. Radhakrishna, S., and T.R.S. Raman. 2016. Get the monkey off the back. The Tribune, August 23.Google Scholar
  36. Rao, K.S., R.K. Maikhuri, S. Nautiyal, and K.G. Saxena. 2002. Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: A case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 66: 317–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)90587-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rattan, S. 2011. Managing human–macaque conflict in Himachal, India. In Monkeys on the edge: ecology and management of long-tailed macaques and their interface with humans, ed. M. Gumert, A. Fuentes, and L. Jones-Engel, 283–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Riley, E.P. 2007. The human–macaque interface: Conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist 109: 473–484.  https://doi.org/10.1525/AA.2007.109.3.473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rust, N.A., J. Tzanopoulos, T. Humle, and D.C. MacMillan. 2016. Why has human–carnivore conflict not been resolved in Namibia? Society and Natural Resources 29: 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saraswat, R., A. Sinha, and S. Radhakrishna. 2015. A god becomes a pest? Human–rhesus macaque interactions in Himachal Pradesh, northern India. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0913-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sengupta, A., and S. Radhakrishna. 2013. Of concern yet? Distribution and conservation status of the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) in Goa, India. Primate Conservation 27: 109–114.  https://doi.org/10.1896/052.027.0113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh, M., and N.R. Rao. 2004. Population dynamics and conservation of commensal bonnet macaques. International Journal of Primatology 25: 847–859.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000029125.54747.ee.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh, V., and M. Thakur. 2012. Rhesus macaque and associated problems in Himachal Pradesh-India. TAPROBANICA: The Journal of Asian Biodiversity 4: 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh, M., A. Kumar, and S. Molur. 2008. Macaca radiata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Google Scholar
  45. Singh, M., J.J. Erinjery, T.S. Kavana, K. Roy, and M. Singh. 2011. Drastic population decline and conservation prospects of roadside dark-bellied bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata radiata) of southern India. Primates 52: 149–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-011-0234-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Suryawanshi, K.R., Y.V. Bhatnagar, S. Redpath, and C. Mishra. 2013. People, predators and perceptions: Patterns of livestock depredation by snow leopards and wolves. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 550–560.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas, L.K., and D.N. Jones. 1999. Management options for a human–wildlife conflict: Australian magpie attacks on humans. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 4: 93–95.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209909359160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Treves, A. 2009. The human dimensions of conflicts with wildlife around protected areas. In Wildlife and society: The science of human dimension, ed. M.J. Manfredo, J.J. Vaske, P.J. Brown, D. Decker, and E.A. Duke, 214–228. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  49. Treves, A., R.B. Wallace, L. Naughton-Treves, and A. Morales. 2006. Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: A review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11: 383–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200600984265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vasan, S. 2001. Community forestry: Historical legacy of Himachal Pradesh. Himalaya 21: 36–45.Google Scholar
  51. Watkins, C. 2006. Local ecological perceptions of chimpanzees and forest resources: A case study near Budongo Forest, Uganda. In Primates of Western Uganda, ed. N.E. Newton-Fisher, H. Notman, J.D. Paterson, and V. Reynolds, 423–437. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams, R. 2006. The analysis of culture. In Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader, 2nd ed, ed. J. Storey, 32–40. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural Sciences and EngineeringNational Institute of Advanced StudiesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations