, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 78–85 | Cite as

Effects of scarcity, aesthetics and ecology on wildlife auction prices of large African mammals

  • Fredrik Dalerum
  • María Miranda
  • Cristina Muñiz
  • Plácido Rodríguez


For successful integration of biological conservation into economic markets, economic processes need to capture ecological values. South African wildlife ranching is a tourist-based activity that generates unique information on the economic value of wildlife species. We used public data from South African wildlife auctions to evaluate if annual prices 1991–2012 related to species characteristics associated with scarcity, aesthetics and ecology of South African carnivores and ungulates. While none of the species characteristics influenced carnivore prices, ungulate prices were related to characteristics associated with novelty and aesthetics, which relative importance had increased over time. We raise both ecological and economic concerns for this apparent focus. Our results also suggest a potential importance of non-species-related factors, such as market and buyer characteristics. We encourage further evaluation of the relative influences of species characteristics versus factors that are intrinsically linked to economic processes on price variations in South African wildlife.


Consumer preferences Ecological economics, Ecotourism Game farming Hedonic pricing Wildlife 



Ben Oban kindly provided compiled data on game prices for 1991–2011. FD received financial support from a Ramón y Cajal fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Supplementary material

13280_2017_937_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (189 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 189 kb)


  1. Antelope Specialist Group. 2015. IUCN SSC ASG Position Statement on the Intentional Genetic Manipulation of Antelopes Ver. 1.0 (30 April 2015). IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group.
  2. Amin, A. 2016. Exploring the role of economic incentives and spillover effects in biodiversity conservation policies in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecological Economics 127: 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayele, G., M.A. Jabbar, H. Teklewold, E. Mulugeta, and G. Kebede. 2006. Seasonal and inter-market differences in prices of small ruminants in Ethiopia. Journal of Food Products Marketing 12: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmford, A., A. Bruner, P. Cooper, R. Costanza, S. Farber, R.E. Green, M. Jenkins, P. Jefferiss, V. Jessamy, J. Madden, K. Munro, N. Myers, S. Naeem, J. Paavola, M. Rayment, S. Rosendo, J. Roughgarden, K. Trumper, and R.K. Turner. 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297: 950–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjaminsen, T.A., and I. Bryceson. 2012. Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania. Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bothma, J.P., J.G. du Toit, and J. van Rooyen. 2010. Buying and selling wild animals. In Game Ranch Management, ed. J.P. Bothma, 619–639. Johannesburg: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, E., S.E. Baker, and D.W. Macdonald. 2014. Global trades in exotic pets 2006–2013. Conservation Biology 28: 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, S.R., H.A. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R.S. DeFries, S. Díaz, T. Dietz, A.K. Duraiappah, A. Oteng-Yeboah, H. Miguel Pereira, C. Perrins, W.V. Reid, J. Sarukhan, R.J. Scholes, and A. Whyte. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 106: 1305–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Courchamp, F., E. Angulo, P. Rivalan, R.J. Hall, L. Signoret, L. Bull, and Y. Meinard. 2006. Rarity value and species extinction: The anthropogenic Allee effect. PLoS Biology 4: e415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farberk, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Suttonkk, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coursey, D.L. 1998. The revealed demand for a public good: Evidence from endangered and threatened species. New York University Environmental Law Journal 6: 411–449.Google Scholar
  12. Court, A.T. 1939. Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples. The Dynamics of Automotive Demand, 98–119. New York: General Motors.Google Scholar
  13. Cousins, J.A., J.P. Sadler, and J. Evans. 2008. Exploring the role of private wildlife ranching as a conservation tool in South Africa: Stakeholder perspectives. Ecology and Society 13: 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czech, B., P.R. Krausman, and R. Borkhartaria. 1998. Social construction, political power, and allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conservation Biology 12: 1103–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalerum, F. 2013. Phylogenetic and functional diversity in large carnivore assemblages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B Biology 280: 20130049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalerum, F. 2014. Identifying the role of conservation biology for solving the environmental crisis. Ambio 43: 839–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalerum, F., and M. Miranda. 2016. Game auction prices are not related to biodiversity contributions of southern African ungulates and large carnivores. Scientific Reports 6: 21922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalerum, F., M.J. Somers, K.E. Kunkel, and E.Z. Cameron. 2008. The potential for large carnivores to act as biodiversity surrogates in southern Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 2939–2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards, L.J., K.E. Muller, R.D. Wolfinger, B.F. Qaqish, and O. Schabenberger. 2008. An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine 27: 6137–6157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrlich, P.R., and A.H. Ehrlich. 2013. Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B Biology 280: 20122845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray, G.G. 1995. The Human Dimensions to Wildlife Ecology. Champaign: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hector, A., S. Felten, and B. Schmid. 2010. Analysis of variance with unbalanced data: An update for ecology and evolution. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 308–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honey, M. 2008. Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise?, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jaeger, B. 2016. r2glmm: Computes R squared for mixed (multilevel) models. R package version 0.1.1.
  25. Johnson, P.C.D. 2014. Extension of Nakagawa and Schielzeth’s RGLMM2 to random slopes models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5: 944–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, P.J., R. Kansky, A.J. Loveridge, and D.W. Macdonald. 2010. Size, rarity and charisma: Valuing African wildlife trophies. PLoS ONE 5: e12866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, K.E., J. Bielby, M. Cardillo, S.A. Fritz, J. O’Dell, C.D.L. Orme, K. Safi, W. Sechrest, E.H. Boakes, C. Carbone, C. Connolly, M.J. Cutts, J.K. Foster, R. Grenyer, M. Habib, C.A. Plaster, S.A. Price, E.A. Rigby, J. Rist, A. Teacher, O.R.P. Bininda-Emonds, J.L. Gittleman, G.M. Mace, and A. Purvis. 2009. PanTHERIA: A species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90: 2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kassie, G.T., A. Abdulai, and C. Wollny. 2011. Heteroscedastic hedonic price model for cattle in the rural markets of central Ethiopia. Applied Economics 43: 3459–3464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kellert, S.R. 1996. The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lancaster, K. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mace, G.M. 2014. Whose conservation? Science 345: 1558–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakagawa, S., and H. Schielzeth. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, and D. Sarkar. 2016. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R package version 3.1-127.
  34. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82: 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shiller, R.J. 2016. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Skinner, J.D., and C. Chimimba. 2005. Mammals of the Southern African Subregion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snijders, D. 2012. Wild property and its boundaries: On wildlife policy and rural consequences in South Africa. Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stokes, D. 2007. Things we like: Human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Human Ecology 35: 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, A., P. Lindsey, and H. Davies-Mostert, H. (2016). An assessment of the economic, social and conservation value of the wildlife ranching industry and its potential to support the green economy in South Africa. Green economy research report, Development Bank of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
  40. Terfa, Z.G., A. Haile, D. Baker, and G.T. Kassie. 2013. Valuation of traits of indigenous sheep using hedonic pricing in Central Ethiopia. Agricultural and Food Economics 1: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turnhout, E., C. Waterton, K. Neves, and N. Buizer. 2014. Rethinking biodiversity: From goods and services to “living with”. Conservation Letters 6: 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Val-Ilosera, M., and P. Cassey. 2017. Physical attractiveness, constraints to the trade and handling requirements drive the variation in species availability in the Australian cagebird trade. Ecological Economics 131: 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van der Merwe, P., M. Saayman, and W. Krugell. 2004. Factors that determine the price of game. Koedoe 47: 105–113.Google Scholar
  44. Veblen, T. 1889. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. UNEP. 2011. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication—a synthesis for policy makers. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit of Biodiversity (UO-CSIC-PA)University of OviedoMieresSpain
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and EntomologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OviedoOviedoSpain
  5. 5.Sports Economics Observatory Foundation (FOED)University of OviedoGijonSpain

Personalised recommendations