, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 25–30 | Cite as

Delivering on seafood traceability under the new U.S. import monitoring program

  • Demian A. Willette
  • Samantha H. Cheng


The United States is the world’s largest fish importer. Recent reports, however, indicate that 25–30% of wild-caught seafood imported into the US is illegally caught, heightening concerns over the country’s significant role in driving Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. In January 2017, NOAA enacted the Seafood Import Monitoring Program in an effort to combat IUU fishing through mandating improved seafood traceability requirements. This program requires reporting of fisheries data from harvest to arrival at the US border. Given the role of the US as a major global importer of seafood, this regulation could be a transformative action on fisheries worldwide if implementation includes two key components—(1) applying best available and most appropriate technologies and (2) building monitoring and enforcement capacity among trading nations. This paper provides insightful commentary on the potential for this US policy to lead by example and improve an essential natural resource that over a billion people worldwide depend on for nutrition and livelihoods.


Fisheries IUU fishing Marine Policy Seafood Import Monitoring Program Seafood mislabeling Traceability 



We thank participants of the LMU-UCLA Seafood Traceability Forum who made generous contributions to discussions reflected in this manuscript. Thank you to four anonymous reviewers for their valuable perspectives and suggestions in improving this manuscript. D.A. Willette would like to thank M.J.L. Joaquin for valuable logistics support. The manuscript was completed while D.A. Willette was a visiting U.S. Fulbright scholar at the University of the Philippines’ Marine Science Institute (Philippines) and at the Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral's Centro de Agua y Desarrollo Sustentable (Ecuador).


  1. Barber, P.H., M.C.A. Ablan-Lagman, Ambariyanto, R.G.S. Berlinck, D. Cahyani, E.D. Crandall, R. Ravago-Gotanco, M.A. Juinio-Menez, et al. 2014. Advancing biodiversity research in developing countries: The need for changing paradigms. Bulletin of Marine Science 90: 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, N.J., L. Teh, Y. Ota, P. Christie, A. Ayers, J.C. Day, P. Franks, D. Gill, et al. 2017. An appeal for a code of conduct for marine conservation. Marine Policy 81: 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman, M. 2013. A tale of two CITES: Divergent perspectives upon the effectiveness of the wildlife trade convention. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 22: 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradsher, K. 2005. Disneyland in China offers a soup and lands in a stew. The New York Times, New York, NY, 17 June.
  5. Challender, D.W.S., and D.C. MacMillan. 2014. Poaching is more than an enforcement problem. Conservation Letters 7: 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Challender, D.W.S., S.R. Harrop, and D.C. MacMillan. 2015. Towards informed and multi-faceted wildlife trade interventions. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeSombre, E.R., and J.S. Barkin. 2011. Fish in water. Cmbridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eyes on the Seas. 2015. Project Brief, The Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
  9. Fisheries of the United States. 2015. ed. A. Lowther, MM. Liddel. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA.Google Scholar
  10. Huxley-Jones, E., J.L.A. Shaw, C. Fletcher, J. Parnell, and P.C. Watts. 2012. Use of DNA barcoding to reveal species composition of convenience seafood. Conservation Biology 26: 367–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Global Dietary Database. 2017. Global Nutrition and Policy Consortium. Retrieved 1 June 2017, from
  12. Hallstein, E., and S.B. Villas-Boas. 2013. Can household consumers save the wild fish? Lessons from a sustainable seafood advisory. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66: 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilborn, R., P. Arcese, M. Borner, J. Hando, G. Hopcraft, M. Loibooki, S. Mduma, and A.R. Sinclair. 2006. Effective Enforcement in a Conservation Area. Science 314: 1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houssa, R., and M. Verpoorten. 2015. The unintended consequences of an export ban: Evidence from Benin’s shrimp sector. World Development 67: 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jablonicky, C., D. McCauley, D. Kroodsma, K. Boerder, and D. Dunn. 2016. Satellite tracking to monitor area-based management tools and identify governance gaps in fisheries beyond national jurisdiction. Policy Brief, Nereus Program. P 4.Google Scholar
  16. Jacquet, J., J. Hocevar, S. Lai, P. Majluf, N. Pelletier, T. Pitcher, E. Sala, R. Sumaila, and D. Pauly. 2009. Conserving wild fish in a sea of market-based efforts. Oryx 44: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly, R.P., J.A. Port, K.M. Yamahara, and L.B. Crowder. 2014. Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLoS ONE 9: e86175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kroodsma, D.A., N.A. Miller, and A. Roan. 2017. The global view of transshipments: Preliminary findings. Global Fish Watch, SkyTruth.Google Scholar
  19. Lubchenco, J., E.B. Cerny-Chipman, J.N. Reimer, and S.A. Levin. 2016. The right incentives enable ocean sustainability successes and provide hope for the future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 14507–14514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 MSA § 2.Google Scholar
  21. Maralit, B.A., R.D. Aguila, M.F.H. Ventolero, S.K.L. Perez, D.A. Willette, and M.D. Santos. 2013. Detection of mislabeled commercial fishery by-products in the Philippines using DNA barcodes and its implications to food traceability and safety. Food Control 33: 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCauley, D.J., P. Wood, B. Sullivan, B. Bergman, C. Jablonicky, A. Roan, M. Hirshfield, K. Boerder, and B. Worm. 2016. Ending hide and seek at sea. Science 351: 1148–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendoza, M., R. McDowell, M. Mason, and E. Htusan. 2016. Fishermen slaves: Human trafficking and the seafood we eat. Albuquerque: Associated Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mora, C., R.A. Myers, M. Coll, S. Libralato, T.J. Pitcher, R.U. Sumaila, D. Zeller, R. Watson, et al. 2009. Management effectiveness of the world’s marine fisheries. PLoS Biology 7: e1000131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morgan, G.R., D. Staples, and S. Funge-Smith. 2007. Fishing capacity management and IUU fishing in Asia. FAO RAP Publication 2007/16.Google Scholar
  26. Newton, K., I.M. Cote, G.M. Pilling, S. Jennings, and N.K. Dulvy. 2007. Current and future sustainability of island coral reef fisheries. Current Biology 17: 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NOAA 2017. Fishwatch. US Seafood facts Retrieved 1 June 2017, from
  28. Parreno-Marchante, A., A. Alvarez-Melcon, M. Trebar, and P. Filippin. 2014. Advanced traceability system in aquaculture supply chain. Journal of Food Engineering 122: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phelps, J., E. Webb, D. Bickford, V. Nijman, and N.S. Sodhi. 2010. Boosting CITES. Science 330: 1752–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pramod, G., K. Nakuma, T.J. Pitcher, and L. Delagran. 2014. Estimates of illegal and unreported fish in seafood imports to the USA. Marine Policy 48: 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosen, G.E., and K.F. Smith. 2010. Summarising the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife. EcoHealth 7: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sigsgaard, E.E., I.B. Nielsen, S.S. Bach, E.D. Lorenzen, D.P. Robinson, S.W. Knudsen, M.W. Pedersen, M.A. Jaidah, et al. 2016. Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 1: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomsen, P., J.O.S. Kielgast, L.L. Iversen, C. Wiuf, M. Rasmussen, M.T.P. Gilbert, L. Orlando, and E. Willerslev. 2012. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology 21: 2565–2573. USDA Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) regulations 7 CFR Part 60.Google Scholar
  34. Vandergrift, J. 2013. Note: Elephant poaching: CITES failure to combat the growth in Chinese demand for ivory. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 31: 102–135.Google Scholar
  35. Walsh, M.L., G.R. Tromble, W.S. Patrick, and W.E. Morrison. 2015. Comparative analysis of U.S. Federal fishery management to the FAO ecolabelling guidelines: A self-assessment. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OSF-1, 152 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Ward, T.J. 2008. Barriers to biodiversity conservation in marine fisheries certification. Fish and Fisheries 9: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warner, K., W. Timme, B. Lowell, and M. Hirshfield. 2013. Oceana study reveals seafood fraud nationwide. Oceana 11: 1–69.Google Scholar
  38. Weber, D.S., T. Mandler, M. Dyck, P.J. Van Coeverden De Groot, D.S. Lee, and D.A. Clark. 2015. Unexpected and undesired conservation outcomes of wildlife trade bans—An emerging problem for stakeholders? Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Willette, D.A., F.A. Allendorf, P.H. Barber, D.J. Barshis, K.E. Carpenter, E.D. Crandall, W.A. Cresko, I. Fernandez-Silva, et al. 2014. So, you want to use next-generation sequencing in marine systems? Insight from the Pan-Pacific Advanced Studies Institute. Bulletin of Marine Science 90: 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willette, D.A., S.E. Simmonds, S.H. Cheng, S. Esteves, T.L. Kane, H. Nuetzel, N. Pilaud, R. Rachmawati, et al. 2017. Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants. Conservation Biology. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12888.Google Scholar
  41. NOAA Seafood Import Monitoring Program, 15 CFR part 902, Vol 81, No. 237.Google Scholar
  42. US FWS Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3371–3378.Google Scholar
  43. World Wildlife Fund. 2016. An Analysis of the Impact of IUU Imports on U.S. Fishermen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyLoyola Marymount UniversityLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.National Center for Ecological Analysis & SynthesisUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations