Mapping policies for surface water protection zones on forest land in the Nordic–Baltic region: Large differences in prescriptiveness and zone width
- 315 Downloads
The forest landscape across the Nordic and Baltic regions hosts numerous lakes and watercourses, which must be included in forest management. In this study, national policy designs regarding protection zones for surface waters on forest land were reviewed and compared for the Nordic countries, Estonia and Latvia. The focus was how each country regulates protection zones, whether they are voluntary or mandatory, and the rationale behind adopting a low or high degree of prescriptiveness. Iceland and Denmark had a low degree of policy prescriptiveness, whereas Norway, Estonia and Latvia had a high degree of prescriptiveness. Sweden and Finland relied to a large extent on voluntary commitments. The prescribed zone widths within the region ranged from 1 m to 5 km. The results indicated that land-use distribution, forest ownership structure and historical and political legacies have influenced the varying degrees of prescriptiveness in the region.
KeywordsBuffer Certification Forestry Guidelines Legislation Riparian
This study was made possible by the network Centre of Advanced Research on Environmental Services from Nordic Forest Ecosystems (CAR-ES), which was funded by the Nordic Forest Research Co-operation Committee (SNS). Eva Ring, Johanna Johansson and Camilla Sandström gratefully acknowledge funding from the interdisciplinary research programme Future Forests financed by MISTRA (The Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research), the Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogforsk), the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) and Umeå University. Zane Lībiete acknowledges funding from the Latvian Forest Sector Competence Centre project “Methods and technologies to increase forest value” (L-KC-11-0004). Magne Sætersdal acknowledges funding from the Norwegian Ministry of Food and Agriculture. We would also like to thank the Estonian Environmental Agency, Ministry of Environment and State Forest Management Centre (particularly K. Kohv) for providing valuable information about Estonia.
- Ahtiainen, M., and P. Huttunen. 1999. Long-term effects of forestry managements on water quality and loading in brooks. Boreal Environment Research 4: 101–114.Google Scholar
- Andersson, E., M. Andersson, Y. Birkne, S. Claesson, O. Forsberg, and G. Lundh. 2013. Target goals for good environmental consideration. A part delivery from Dialog om miljöhänsyn. Swedish Forest Agency, Report 5, Jönköping, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Cashore, B. 1997. Governing forestry: environmental group influence in British Columbia and the US Pacific Northwest. Ph.D. Thesis. Canada: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Esseen, P.-A., A. Glimskär, and G. Ståhl. 2004. Linear landscape elements in Sweden: estimates from the NILS-data of year 2003. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Arbetsrapport 127 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- EEA. 2016. European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/countries/is/land-use-state-and-impacts-iceland. Accessed 8 Apr 2016.
- FAO. 2015. FAO’s Global Forest Resource Assessment 2015. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/current-assessment/en/.
- Forest and Nature Agency. 2010. Forest and nature in numbers 2010. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Nature Agency. http://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/Attachments/SkovognaturiTal2010.pdf (in Danish).
- FSC. 2015. FSC® International Standard, FSC principles and criteria for forest stewardship, FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN. Forest Stewardship Council.Google Scholar
- FSC. 2016. FSC Facts & Figures March 1, 2016. Forest Stewardship Council. https://ic.fsc.org/.
- Friberg, N. 1998. Forest and forest streams. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser (now Danish Centre for Environment and Energy), Temarapport from DMU 21/1998 (in Danish).Google Scholar
- Friis-Møller, P., J. Bigler, B.O. Nielsen, I.M. Thomsen, R.M. Buttenschøn, and J. Heilmann-Clausen. 2010. Dynamics and disturbances in the forest. In Naturen i Danmark. Skovene, ed. P. Friis-Møller, 271–303. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel og Nordisk Forlag A/S. (in Danish).Google Scholar
- Johansson, J. 2013. Constructing and contesting the legitimacy of private forest governance: the case of forest certification in Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis. Sweden: Umeå University.Google Scholar
- Joensuu, S., M. Kauppila, M. Lindén, and T. Tenhola. 2012. Guidelines for good forestry practices—water protection. Helsinki: Publications of Tapio. (in Finnish).Google Scholar
- Latvian Ministry of Agriculture. 1923. Instruction for forest inventory. Riga: Latvian Ministry of Agriculture. (in Latvian).Google Scholar
- Latvian Ministry of Agriculture. 1937. Instruction for forest protection. Valdibas Vestnesis 260: 1–4. (in Latvian).Google Scholar
- McDermott, C.L., B. Cashore, and P. Kanowski. 2009. Setting the bar: An international comparison of public and private forest policy specifications and implications for explaining policy trends. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 6: 217–237. doi: 10.1080/19438150903090533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mårald, E., C. Sandström, L. Rist, O. Rosvall, L. Samuelsson, and A. Idenfors. 2015. Exploring the use of a dialogue process to tackle a complex and controversial issue in forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 30: 749–756. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1065343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NCM. 2017. Nordic Council of Ministers. http://www.norden.org/en/om-samarbejdet-1/formal-nordic-co-operation. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
- Päivinen, J., N. Björkqvist, L. Karvonen, M. Kaukonen, K.-M. Korhonen, P. Kuokkanen, H. Lehtonen, and A. Tolonen. 2011. Forestry and environmental management. Vantaa: Metsähallitus Publications of Forestry 67. (in Finnish).Google Scholar
- PEFC. 2010. Sustainable forest management—requirements. PEFC ST 1003:2010. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes.Google Scholar
- PEFC. 2015. PEFC Global Statistics: SFM & CoC Certification, Data: December 2015. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes. http://www.pefc.org/.
- Raatikainen, M., and E. Kuusisto. 1990. The number and surface area of the lakes in Finland. Terra 102: 97–110. (in Finnish).Google Scholar
- Swedish Forest Agency. 2014. Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry 2014. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.Google Scholar
- Tamre, R. 2006. List of lakes in Estonia. Natural and artificial lakes. Ministry of the Environment Information Centre. http://www.keskkonnainfo.ee/publications/113_PDF.pdf (in Estonian).
- The World Bank. 2016. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.AGRI.ZS. Accessed 8 Apr 2016.
- The World Bank. 2017. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GNIPC.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2017.