, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 190–200 | Cite as

Marine pollution originating from purse seine and longline fishing vessel operations in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, 2003–2015

  • Kelsey Richardson
  • David Haynes
  • Anthony Talouli
  • Michael Donoghue


Fisheries observer data recorded between 2003 and 2015 on-board purse seine and longline vessels operating in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean reported more than 10 000 pollution incidents within the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of 25 Pacific countries and territories, and in international waters. A majority of the reported purse seine pollution incidents related to dumping of plastics waste. Other common pollution incidents related to oil spillages and to abandoned, lost or dumped fishing gear. Data analysis highlighted the need for increased monitoring, reporting, and enforcement of pollution violations by all types of fishing vessels operating in the Pacific region; a regional outreach and compliance assistance programme on marine pollution prevention and improvements in Pacific port waste reception facilities.


Abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear Fisheries Marine pollution Pacific Ocean Plastic pollution 



The authors would like to acknowledge the support, co-operation and communication of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) and the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in helping to better understand the nature of these pollution incidents and work towards achievable solutions to mitigate this problem.

Supplementary material

13280_2016_811_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (189 kb)
Appendix S1 (PDF 190 kb)


  1. Ballance, A., P.G. Ryan, and J. Turpie. 2000. How much is a clean beach worth? The impact of litter on beach users in the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. South African Journal of Science 96: 210–213.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, D.K.A., F. Galgani, R.C. Thompson, and M. Barlaz. 2009. Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 1985–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, D.K.A. 2002. Biodiversity: Invasions by marine life on plastic debris. Nature 416: 808–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies, T.K., C.C. Mees, and E.J. Milner-Gulland. 2014. The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian Ocean. Marine Policy 45: 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donohue, M.J., R.C. Boland, C.M. Sramek, and G.A. Antonelis. 2001. Derelict fishing gear in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands: Diving surveys and debris removal in 1999 confirm threat to coral reef ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42: 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fonteneau, A., E. Chassot, and N. Bodin. 2013. Global spatio-temporal patterns in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries on drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs): Taking a historical perspective to inform current challenges. Aquatic Living Resources 26: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GEF-CReW. 2015. Caribbean regional fund for wastewater management, GEF-CReW (Global Environment Facility Caribbean Regional Fund for Wastewater Management). Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  8. GESAMP (Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution). 1991. The state of the marine environment. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Gregory, M.R. 2009. Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings—entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 2013–2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenpeace. 2015. Greenpeace warns of proposals that would pave the way for large increases in fishing capacity-Greenpeace Briefing to the 19th Annual Meeting of the IOTC. 19th Annual Meeting of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, Busan, Korea, 27 April-1 May, 2015. IOTC-2015-S19-NGO04.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, K. 2000. Impacts of marine debris and oil: Economic and social costs to coastal communities-report published by Kommunenes Internasjonale Kommunenes Internasjonale Miljøorganisasjon (KIMO), c/o Shetland Islands Council, Environment and Transportation Department, Grantfield, Lerwick, Shetland, ZE1 0NT, ISBN 0904562891.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, N.M., K.L.E. Berry, L. Rintoul, and M.O. Hoogenboom. 2015. Microplastic ingestion by scleractinian corals. Marine Biology 162: 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IMO. 2015. International convention for the prevention of pollution from ships (MARPOL). Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  14. IMO. 2015. Prevention of pollution by garbage from ships. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  15. IMO. 2015. Status of conventions. Retrieved July 10, 2015 from
  16. Jambeck, J.R., R. Geyer, C. Wilcox, T.R. Siegler, M. Perryman, A. Andrady, R. Narayan, and K.L. Law. 2015. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347: 768–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, M.M. 1995. Fishing debris in the Australian marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 30: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katsanevakis, S. 2008. Marine debris, a growing problem: Sources, distribution, composition, and impacts. In Marine pollution: New research, ed. T.N. Hofer, 53–100. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Laist, D.W. 1997. Impacts of marine debris: Entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. In Marine debris sources, impacts, and solutions, ed. J.M. Coe, and D. Rogers, 81–97. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Leggett, C., N. Sherer, M. Curry, R. Bailey, and T. Haab. 2014. Assessing the economic benefits of reductions in marine debris: A pilot study of beach recreation in Orange County, California-report for marine debris division, national oceanic and atmospheric administration. Industrial Economics, Incorporated, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Macfadyen, G., T. Huntington, and R. Cappell. 2009. Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 185; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, No. 523. Rome, UNEP/FAO.Google Scholar
  22. Nash, A.D. 1992. Impacts of marine debris on subsistence fishermen: An exploratory study. Marine Pollution Bulletin 24: 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Øhlenschlæger, J.P., S. Newman, and A. Farmer. 2013. Reducing ship generated marine litter—recommendations to improve the EU port reception facilities directive-report produced for seas at risk. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
  24. Rochman, C.M., E. Hoh, T. Kurobe, and S.J. Teh. 2013. Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. Scientific Reports 3: 3263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rochman, C.M., T. Kurobe, I. Flores, and S.J. Teh. 2014. Early warning signs of endocrine disruption in adult fish from the ingestion of polyethylene with and without sorbed chemical pollutants from the marine environment. Science of the Total Environment 493: 656–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Romeo, T., B. Pietro, C. Peda, P. Consoli, F. Andaloro, and M.C. Fossi. 2015. First evidence of presence of plastic debris in stomach of large pelagic fish in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 95: 358–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sagapolutele, F. 2015. FAD found at Fagaalu Bay destroyed fragile coral, Samoa News. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  28. Sherrington, C., C. Pitts-Tucker, and D. Hogg. 2014. Report II: Marine Debris and commercial vessel best practice-report for the secretariat of the convention on migratory species, 18th meeting of the scientific council, Bonn, Germany. Bristol: Eunomia Research & Consulting Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Schlining, K., S. von Thun, L. Kuhnz, B. Schlining, L. Lundsten, N.J. Stout, L. Chaney, and J. Connor. 2013. Debris in the deep: Using a 22-year video annotation database to survey marine litter in Monterey Canyon, central California, USA. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 79: 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SPC. 2010. Purse seine, tuna fisheries, oceanic fisheries programme. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  31. SPREP. 2014. World-first shipping plan to deliver cleaner oceans for the Pacific Region, Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  32. UNEP. 2009. Marine litter: A global challenge. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
  33. UNEP. 2014. Valuing plastics: The business case for measuring, managing and disclosing plastic use in the consumer goods industry.Google Scholar
  34. Van Cauwenberghe, L., and C.R. Janssen. 2014. Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. Environmental Pollution 193: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watkins E., P. ten Brink, S. Withana, K. Mutafoglu, J-P. Schweitzer, D. Russi, and M. Kettunen. 2015. Marine litter: Socio-economic study. Scoping Report, London.Google Scholar
  36. WCPFC. 2009. Fisheries to be monitored-report for regional observer programme third intercessional working group, Guam, 17th to 21st March, 2009. WCPFC/ROP-IWG3/2009-08. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.Google Scholar
  37. WCPFC. 2010. Conservation and management measure to establish a list of vessels presumed to have carried out illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities in the WCPO-report for seventh regular session, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 6–10 December, 2010. Conservation and Management Measure 2010-06. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.Google Scholar
  38. WCPFC. 2014. Status of observer data management-report for technical and compliance committee tenth regular session, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia, 25–30 September, 2014. WCPFC-TCC10-2014-IP05. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.Google Scholar
  39. WCPFC. 2015. Tuna fishery yearbook 2014. Oceanic Fisheries programme, secretariat of the pacific community, Noumea, New Caledonia. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.Google Scholar
  40. Winston, J.E., M.R. Gregory, and L.M. Stevens. 1997. Encrusters, epibionts, and other biota associated with pelagic plastics: A review of biogeographical, environmental and conservation issues. In Marine debris sources, impacts, and solutions, ed. J.M. Coe, and D. Rogers, 81–97. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. World Animal Protection. 2014. Fishing’s phantom menace: How ghost fishing gear is endangering our sea life. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from
  42. Zettler, E.R., T.J. Mincer, and L.A. Amaral-Zettler. 2013. Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environmental Science and Technology 47: 7137–7146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelsey Richardson
    • 1
  • David Haynes
    • 2
  • Anthony Talouli
    • 3
  • Michael Donoghue
    • 3
  1. 1.San DiegoUSA
  2. 2.South HobartAustralia
  3. 3.Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP)ApiaSamoa

Personalised recommendations