Skip to main content
Log in

Getting past the blame game: Convergence and divergence in perceived threats to salmon resources among anglers and indigenous fishers in Canada’s lower Fraser River

  • Report
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines threat perception as a potential dimension of inter-group conflict over salmon fisheries in Canada’s Fraser River watershed. Environmental changes and the entry of new user groups are putting pressure on both the resource and regulators, as well as threatening to exacerbate conflicts, notably between First Nation (indigenous) fishers and non-indigenous recreational anglers. While resource conflicts are often superficially conceptualized as cases of competing interests, we build on recent studies suggesting that conflicts are associated with deeper cognitive and perceptual differences among user groups. We report findings from 422 riverbank interviews with First Nation fishers and recreational anglers focusing on perceptions of threat to the fisheries. Responses reveal both substantial agreement and disagreement in threat perceptions between the two groups. These patterns provide a potential roadmap for consensus building, and suggest possible avenues for policy-makers to defuse the “blame game” that often dominates this type of conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Acheson, J.M. 1981. Anthropology of fishing. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 10: 275–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W.M., D. Brockington, J. Dyson, and B. Vira. 2003. Managing tragedies: Understanding conflict over common pool resources. Science 302: 1915–1916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allain, J., and J.D. Fréchette. 1993. The Aboriginal fisheries and the Sparrow decision. Ottawa: Library of Parliament, Research Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J.D., R. Abell, Z.E.B. Hogan, C. Revenga, B.W. Taylor, R.L. Welcomme, and K. Winemiller. 2005. Overfishing of inland waters. BioScience 55: 1041–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D., and R. Plummer. 2010. Adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Berlin: Springer-.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., R.J. Gowen, and D.S. McLusky. 1987. The effect of salmon farming on the benthos of a Scottish sea loch. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 109: 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, B.S., E. Nelson, and H.P. Schwarcz. 1983. Marine and terrestrial protein in prehistoric diets on the British Columbia Coast. Current Anthropology 24: 396–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B.I. 2012. The uncertain future of Fraser River Sockeye, vols. 1–3. Ottawa: Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River, Canada. Public Works and Government Services Canada.

  • Denzau, A.T., and D.C. North. 1994. Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47: 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFO. 2010. A vision for recreational fisheries in British Columbia, 2009–2013. Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFO. 2012. Aboriginal fisheries strategy. Retrieved January 20, 201, from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fm-gp/aboriginal-autochtones/afs-srapa-eng.htm.

  • English, K.K., T.C. Edgell, R.C. Bocking, M. Link, and S. Raborn. 2011. Fraser River sockeye fisheries and fisheries management and comparison with Bristol Bay Sockeye Fisheries. LGL Ltd. Cohen Commission Tech. Rept. 7: 190 pp and appendices, Vancouver, BC.

  • Evenden, M.D. 2004. Fish versus power: An environmental history of the Fraser River. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A.P., S.G. Hinch, S.J. Cooke, D.A. Patterson, G.T. Crossin, M. Lapointe, and M.T. Mathes. 2008. Pacific salmon in hot water: Applying aerobic scope models and biotelemetry to predict the success of spawning migrations. Physiological Biochemical Zoology 81: 697–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, S.P., K.H. Pollock, J.M. Lyle, J.G. Pepperell, M.L. Tonks, and W.W. Sawynok. 2010. Following the chain to elusive anglers. Fish and Fisheries 11: 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, H.L., and P.A. Loring. 2014. Larger than life: The emergent nature of conflict in Alaska’s Upper Cook Inlet Salmon Fisheries SAGE Open.. doi:10.1177/2158244014555112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A.D. 2011. Belief-oriented segregation in policy networks. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Science 22: 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A.D., and T. Dietz. 2012. Understanding environmental cognition. Organization & Environment 25: 238–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewes, G. 1973. Indian fisheries productivity in pre-contact times in the Pacific Salmon area. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 7: 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, H.C., D. Nohrstedt, C.M. Weible, and P.A. Sabatier. 2014. The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Theories of the policy process, ed. P.A. Sabatier, and C.M. Weible, 183–224. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., and R. Chuenpagdee. 2009. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy 33: 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.C., and D.C. Griffith. 2010. Finding common ground in the commons: Intracultural variation in users’ conceptions of coastal fisheries issues. Society and Natural Resources 23: 837–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. 2000. Cognitive conflict and consensus building in the National Estuary Program. American Behavioral Scientist 44: 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E.G., S.G. Hinch, D.A. Patterson, M.J. Hague, S.J. Cooke, K.M. Miller, M.F. Lapointe, K.K. English, and A.P. Farrell. 2011. Effects of river temperature and climate warming on stock-specific survival of adult migrating Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Global Change Biology 17: 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matti, S., and A. Sandstrom. 2011. The rationale determining advocacy coalitions: Examining coordination networks and corresponding beliefs. Policy Studies Journal 39: 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B.M. 2007. Be of good mind: Essays on the coast salish. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath, S.M., J. Young, A. Evely, W.A. Adams, W.J. Sutherland, A. Whitehouse, A. Amar, R.A. Lambert, J.D.C. Linnel, A. Watt, and R.J. Gutiérrez. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, D.W., and C. Pollen. 2010. Report cards for three BC recreational fisheries. Vancouver, BC: Watershed Watch Salmon Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5: 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaepe, D. 2007. Stó: lõ identity and the cultural landscape of S’olh Téméxw. In Be of good mind: essays on the coast salish, ed. B.G. Miller, 234–259. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D.P., B. Wee, M. Priddy, and J. Harbor. 2007. Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44: 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.R. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation. 27: 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. 1990. Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C.M. 2007. An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California Marine Protected Area Policy. Journal of Public Administration and Research and Theory 17: 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants who agreed to be interviewed and Department of Fisheries and Oceans for logistical support. We thank Eric Vogt, Natalie Sopinka, Katrina Cook, and Nolan Bett for field assistance and Murray Rudd for commenting and providing perspectives on this article. We also thank Ravi Pendakur and Phyllis Rippey for their advice on statistics. This research was supported b the Ocean Tracking Network through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada with additional support from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Cooke is additionally supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian M. Nguyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, V.M., Young, N., Hinch, S.G. et al. Getting past the blame game: Convergence and divergence in perceived threats to salmon resources among anglers and indigenous fishers in Canada’s lower Fraser River. Ambio 45, 591–601 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0769-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0769-6

Keywords

Navigation