Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers
- 652 Downloads
Managing invasive species is a major challenge for society. In the case of newly established invaders, rapid action is key for a successful management. Here, we develop, describe and recommend a three-step transdisciplinary process (the “butterfly model”) to rapidly initiate action for invasion management. In the framing of a case study, we present results from the first of these steps: assessing priorities and contributions of both scientists and decision makers. Both scientists and decision makers prioritise research on prevention. The available scientific knowledge contributions, however, are publications on impacts rather than prevention of the invasive species. The contribution of scientific knowledge does thus not reflect scientists’ perception of what is essentially needed. We argue that a more objective assessment and transparent communication of not only decision makers’ but also scientists’ priorities is an essential basis for a successful cooperation. Our three-step model can help achieve objectivity via transdisciplinary communication.
KeywordsConservation managers Decision makers Invasive species Round goby Strong objectivity Transdisciplinary
We thank all workshop participants and organisers, Catherine Cornaz for assistance with the literature review, Hannes Weigt, Philipp Mayer and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This project was funded by a special grant from the Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland, the Research Centre for Sustainable Energy and Water Supply (FoNEW), the canton BS, plus cantonal lottery funds of AG, BL, SO. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Barreteau, O., P. Bots, and K. Daniell. 2010. A framework for clarifying participation in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons. Ecology and Society 15.Google Scholar
- Bens, I. 2012. Facilitating with ease! Core skills for facilitators, team leaders and members, managers, consultants, and trainers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, A.F. 2013. What is this thing called science?. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
- DAISIE. 2015. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway: 100 of the worst. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesTheWorst.do.
- Dimond, P.E., N.E. Mandrak, and B. Brownson. 2010. Summary of the rapid response to Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Pefferlaw Brook with an evaluation of the national rapid response framework based on the Pefferlaw Brook experience. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2010/036. vi + 33 p.Google Scholar
- Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland. 2015. Strategie der Schweiz zu invasiven gebietsfremden Arten, Entwurf (Strategy on invasive alien species, Draft). Retrieved October 7, 2015, from https://www.admin.ch/ch/d/gg/pc/documents/2697/Strategie-zu-invasiven-gebietsfremden-Arten_Entwurf-Strategie_de.pdf.
- García-Llorente, M., B. Martín-López, P.A. Nunes, J.A. González, P. Alcorlo, and C. Montes. 2011. Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: Eradication and prevention. Environmental Management 48: 418–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Genovesi, P., and C. Shine. 2004. European strategy on invasive alien species: Convention on the conservation of european wildlife and habitats (Bern Convention). Council of Europe.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, P.E., A. N’Guyen, I. Kalchhauser, and P. Burkardt-Holm. 2015. What do we really know about the impacts of one of the 100 worst invaders in Europe? A reality check. Ambio. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0718-9.
- IKSR. 2015. The Rhine. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://www.iksr.org/en/rhine/index.html.
- Kettunen, M., P. Genovesi, S. Gollasch, S. Pagad, U. Starfinger, P. ten Brink, and C. Shine. 2009. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS). London: Institut for European Environnemental Policy (IEEP).Google Scholar
- Nentwig, W. (ed.). 2007. Biological invasions. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2005. Handbook of the convention on biological diversity including its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
- Swiss Federal Council. 2008. Verordnung über den Umgang mit Organismen in der Umwelt [Ordinance on the Release of Organisms into the Environment]: FrSV.Google Scholar