Skip to main content
Log in

Valuation of ecotoxicological impacts from tributyltin based on a quantitative environmental assessment framework

  • Report
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the scientific literature, few valuations of biodiversity and ecosystem services following the impacts of toxicity are available, hampered by the lack of ecotoxicological documentation. Here, tributyltin is used to conduct a contingent valuation study as well as cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of measures for improving the environmental status in Swedish coastal waters of the Baltic Sea. Benefits considering different dimensions when assessing environmental status are highlighted and a quantitative environmental assessment framework based on available technology, ecological conditions, and economic valuation methodology is developed. Two scenarios are used in the valuation study: (a) achieving good environmental status by 2020 in accordance with EU legislation (USD 119 household−1 year−1) and (b) achieving visible improvements by 2100 due to natural degradation (USD 108 household−1 year−1) during 8 years. The later scenario was used to illustrate an application of the assessment framework. The CBA results indicate that both scenarios might generate a welfare improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlroth, S., and G. Finnveden. 2011. Ecovalue 08—a new valuation method for environmental systems analysis tools. Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 1994–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlroth, S., M. Nilsson, G. Finnveden, O. Hjelm, and E. Hochschorner. 2011. Weighting and valuation in environmental systems analysis tools. Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahtiainen, H., J. Artell, M. Czajkowski, B. Hasler, L. Hasselström, K. Hyytiänen, J. Meyerhoff, J.C.R. Smart, et al. 2013. Public preferences regarding use and condition of the Baltic Sea—an international comparison informing marine policy. Marine Policy 42: 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, G.W., P.E. Gibbs, G.R. Burt, and L.G. Hummerstone. 1987. The effects of tributyltin (TBT) accumulation on adult dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus: One level-term field and laboratory exposures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 67: 525–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CICES. 2013. Towards a common international classification of ecosystem services. Retrieved June 17, 2013, from http://cices.eu/.

  • Cornelissen, G., A. Pettersen, E. Nesse, A. Helland, and G.D. Breeveld. 2008. The contribution of urban runoff to organic contaminants levels in harbour sediments near two Norwegian cities. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56: 565–573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC. 2000. WFD (Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy).

  • EC. 2003. AFS (International Convention of the Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships 782/2003/EC).

  • EC. 2006. Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006.

  • EC. 2008. MSFD (Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC).

  • Eklund, B., M. Elfström, and H. Borg. 2008. Tributylin originates from pleasure boats in Sweden in spite of firm restrictions. Open Environmental Science 2: 124–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EU. 2005. Environmental Quality Standards (EQS). Substance Data Sheet. Priority Substance No. 30. Tributyltin Compunds (TBT-ion). CAS-No. 688-73-3 (36643-28-4).

  • Fisher, W.S., A. Wishkovsky, and F.L. Chu. 1990. Effects of tributyltin on defense-related activities of oyster hemocytes. Archives of Environmental Toxicology 19: 354–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, C. 2008. A new valuation question: Analysis of and insights from interval open-ended data in contingent valuation. Environmental & Resource Economics 39: 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, M.W. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., B. Kriström, and J. Shogren. 2009. Coherent arbitrariness: On value uncertainty for environmental goods. Land Economics 85: 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havs- och Vattenmyndigheten. 2012. Boat hull cleaning. Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Report 2012:1, Göteborg, Sweden (in Swedish, Båtbottentvättning av fritidsbåtar).

  • Helcom. 2010. Hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea—an integrated thematic assessment on hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea. Balt. Sea Environ. Proceedings No. 120B.

  • Holm, G., D. Bendz, L. Larsson, M. Leppänen, J. Mácsik, P. Pehrson, Y. Rogbeck, and B. Svedberg. 2007. Stabilisation and solidification of contaminated soil and dredge material. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 5696 (in Swedish, English summary: Stabilisering och solidifiering av förorenad jord och muddermassor—Lämplighet och potential för svenska förhållanden).

  • Johnston, R.J., K. Segerson, E.T. Schultz, E.Y. Besedin, and M. Ramachandran. 2011. Indices of biotic integrity in stated preference valuation of aquatic ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 70: 1946–1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosenius, A.-K. 2010. Heterogeneous preferences for water quality attributes: The case of eutrophication in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. Ecological Economics 69(3): 528–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhjem, H., and S. Navrud. 2008. Internet CV surveys—a cheap, fast way to get large samples of biased values? MPRA Paper 11469, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  • Magnusson, Y., B. Svedberg, J. Mácsik, A. Maijala, and H. Jyräva. 2006. Muddermassor med miljöfördelar. Bygg & teknik 2/06: 72–76.

  • Martin-Ortega, J., R. Brouwer, and H. Aiking. 2011. Application of a value-based equivalency method to assess environmental damage compensation under the European Environmental Liability Directive. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 1461–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., and M. Postle. 1994. Risk-benefit analysis and case study on tributyl tin. International Biodetoriation & Biodegradation 34: 401–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noring, M. 2014. Valuing ecosystem services—linking ecology and policy. PhD Thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.

  • Östberg, K., L. Hasselström, and C. Håkansson. 2012. Non-market valuation of the coastal environment—uniting political aims, ecological and economic knowledge. Journal of Environmental Management 110: 166–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prop 2009/10:155 Svenska miljömål—för ett effektivare miljöarbete.

  • Sarradin, P.M., Y. Lapaquellerie, A. Astruc, C. Latouche, and M. Austruc. 1995. One level term behavior and degradation kinetics of tributyltin in a marina sediment. Science of the Total Environment 170: 59–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SCB. 2013. Retrieved December 11, 2013, from http://www.scb.se.

  • SOU 2011:34 Etappmål i miljömålssystemet.

  • Sweco. 2007. In-depth investigation of dredging and disposal of dredged material (in Swedish,‡ Fördjupad utredning gällande muddring och omhändertagande av muddermassor).

  • UN. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity.

  • Viglino, L., E. Pelletier, and R. St-Louis. 2004. Highly persistent butylins in northern marine sediments: A one level-term threat for the Saguenay Fjord (Canada). Environmental Toxicological Chemistry 23: 2673–2681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was gratefully supported by the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration, FMV.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Noring.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 825 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noring, M., Håkansson, C. & Dahlgren, E. Valuation of ecotoxicological impacts from tributyltin based on a quantitative environmental assessment framework. Ambio 45, 120–129 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0682-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0682-4

Keywords

Navigation