, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 275–284 | Cite as

Vulnerability of coastal livelihoods to shrimp farming: Insights from Mozambique

  • Jessica Blythe
  • Mark Flaherty
  • Grant Murray


Millions of people around the world depend on shrimp aquaculture for their livelihoods. Yet, the phenomenal growth of shrimp farming has often given rise to considerable environmental and social damage. This article examines the impacts of commercial, export-oriented shrimp aquaculture on local livelihood vulnerability by comparing the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity of shrimp farm employees with non-farm employees in rural Mozambique. Exposure to stressors was similar between the two groups. Shrimp farm employees had higher assets and higher adaptive capacity than non-farm employees. However, because their income is heavily dependent on a single commodity, shrimp farm employees were highly susceptible to the boom crop nature of intensive shrimp farming. The implications for aquaculture policy and vulnerability research are discussed. The article argues that coastal vulnerability is dynamic, variable, and influenced by multiple processes operating at multiple scales.


Vulnerability Livelihood Shrimp farming Mozambique Africa 


  1. Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, E.H., and F. Ellis. 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 25: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, N.J., P. Dearden, and A.M. Peredo. 2014. Vulnerability to multiple stressors in coastal communities: a study of the Andaman Coast of Thailand. Climate and Development 6: 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke, (ed.). 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blythe, J.L. 2013. Social-ecological analysis of integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems in Dedza, Malawi. Environment, Development and Sustainability 15: 1143–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brummett, R.E., J. Lazard, and J. Moehl. 2008. African aquaculture: Realizing the potential. Food Policy 33: 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush, S.R., B. Belton, D. Hall, P. Vandergeest, F.J. Murray, S. Ponte, P. Oosterveer, M.S. Island, A.P.J. Mol, M. Hatanake, F. Kruijssen, T.T.T. Ha, D.C. Little, and R. Kusumawati. 2013. Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science 341: 1067–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, M.R., P.D. Little, and T. Mogues. 2007. Poverty traps and natural disasters in Ethiopia and Honduras. World Development 35: 835–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cinner, J.E., T.R. McClanahan, N.A.J. Graham, T.M. Daw, J. Maina, S.M. Stead, A. Wamukota, K. Brown, et al. 2012. Vulnerability of coastal communities to key impacts of climate change on coral reef fisheries. Global Environmental Change 22: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diana, J.S., H.S. Egna, T. Chopin, M.S. Peterson, L. Cao, R. Pomweroy, M. Vergegem, W.T. Slack, M.G. Bondad-Reantaso, and F. Cabello. 2013. Responsible aquaculture in 2050: Valuing local conditions and human innovations will be key to success. BioScience 63: 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, F. 2000. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. FAO. 2006. National aquaculture sector overview: Mozambique. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  13. FAO. 2011. FishStat Plus: Capture production 1950–2009. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  14. FAO. 2012. Fishery and aquaculture statistics 2010. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  15. FAO. 2013. Development of a sub-regional strategy for improving biosecurity (aquatic animal health) in the sub-regional countries of the Mozambique Channel. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  16. Füssel, H.-M., and R.J.T. Klein. 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climate Change 75: 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallopín, G.C. 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 16: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Government of Mozambique (GoM). 2011. Poverty Reduction Action Plan (PARP) 2011–2014. Maputo: Government of Mozambique.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, D. 2011. Land grabs, land control and southeast Asian crop booms. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38: 837–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lebel, L., R. Mungkung, S.H. Gheewala, and S.H. Lebel. 2010. Innovation cycles, niches and sustainability in the shrimp aquaculture industry in Thailand. Environmental Science & Policy 13: 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lightner, D.V., R.M. Rednam, C.R. Pantoja, K.F. Tang, B.L. Noble, P. Schofield, L.L. Mohney, L.M. Nunan, and S.A. Navarro. 2012. Historic emergence, impact and current status of shrimp pathogens in the Americas. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 110: 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marshall, N.A., P.A. Marshall, J. Tamelander, D. Obura, D. Malleret-King, and J.E. Cinner. 2010. A framework for social adaptation to climate change: Sustaining tropical coastal communities and industries. New York: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN).Google Scholar
  23. Mills, D., C. Béné, S. Ovie, A. Tafida, F. Sinaba, A. Kodio, A. Russell, N. Andrew, P. Morand, and J. Lemoalle. 2011. Vulnerability in African small-scale fishing communities. Journal of International Development 23: 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Brien, K., S. Eriksen, L.P. Nygaard, and A. Schjolden. 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy 7: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Omar, I., and T. Hecht. 2011. A synopsis of the current status of mariculture in Mozambique. In Mariculture in the WIO regionChallenges and prospects, ed. M. Troell, T. Hecht, M. Beveridge, S. Stead, I. Bryceson, N. Kautsky, A. Mmochi, and F. Ollevier, 13–14. WIOMSA Book Series No. 11. Stone Town: WIOMSA.Google Scholar
  26. Parry, M., O. Canziani, J. Palutikof , O. van der Linden, and C. Hanson (ed.). (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 982 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Paul, B.G., and C.R. Vogl. 2011. Impacts of shrimp farming in Bangladesh: challenges and alternatives. Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Primavera, J.H. 2006. Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean and Coastal Management 49: 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Responsible Aquaculture Foundation (RAF). 2013. Case study of the outbreak of white spot syndrome virus at shrimp farms in Mozambique and Madagascar: Impacts and management recommendations. St. Louis, USA: Responsible Aquaculture Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, D., M.C. Simpson, and R. Sim. 2012. The vulnerability of Caribbean coastal tourism to scenarios of climate change related sea level rise. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 20: 883–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner, B.L., R.E. Kapserson, P.A. Matson, J.J. McCarthy, R.W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J.X. Kasperson, et al. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2013. Human development report 2013. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  33. Vandergeest, P. 2007. Certification and communities: alternatives for regulating the environmental and social imapcts of shrimp farming. World Development 35: 1152–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veuthey, S., and J.-F. Gerber. 2012. Accumulation by dispossession in coastal Ecuador: Shrimp farming, local resistance and the gender structure of mobilizations. Global Environmental Change 22: 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Bank. 2011. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. World Bank. 2013. Fish to 2030—Prospects for fisheries and aquaculture. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of VictoriaBCCanada
  2. 2.ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook UniversityQLDAustralia
  3. 3.WorldFishHoniaraSolomon Islands
  4. 4.Vancouver Island UniversityNanaimoCanada

Personalised recommendations