Abstract
The use of forest land for ecotourism has been well accepted due to its ability to provide income to local people and to conserve the forest. Preparing the forest with infrastructure to attract and educate visitors has been reported of importance. This study applied Q methodology in a small rural community of the State of Puebla, Mexico, to reveal forest owners’ perceptions to build infrastructure in their forest as part of their ecotourism project. It also discloses forest owners’ underlying motives to use their forest for ecotourism. Ecotourism is perceived as a complementary activity to farming that would allow women to be involved in community development. Low impact infrastructure is desired due to forest owners’ perception to preserve the forest for the overall community well-being.
Notes
According to 2006 statistics, 32 % of the population of the village, in particularly young adults, migrated to the United States.
This forest land is separated from the land (ejido) that the government granted to farmers, which is called “tierra ejidal or ejido.”
Due to migration of some of the principal and secondary owners, it was necessary to include immediately family members who are empowered by forest owners to participate in meetings and projects, while they are away.
References
Adam, J.H., S.T. Chong, A.C. Er, N. Lyndon, R. Moorthy, and S. Selvadurai. 2012. Perception of local community towards community-based ecotourism. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 6: 213–218.
Barbosa-Polanco, S., D. Molina, G. Escalona-Segura, and E. Bello. 2010. Organization and ecotourism in ejidos of the Mexican southeast region. Revista Estudio Agrarios 44: 141–160 (In Spanish).
Batta, R.N. 2006. Evaluating ecotourism in mountain areas: A study of three Himalayan destinations. International Review of Environmental Strategies 6: 41–62.
Berninger, K., W. Adamowicz, D. Keeshaw, and C. Messier. 2010. Sustainable forest management preferences of interest groups in three regions with different levels of industrial forestry: An exploratory attribute-based choice experiment. Environmental Management 46: 117–133.
Bhuiyan, M.A.H., S. Chamhuri, I. ShaharuddinMohamad, and I. Rabiul. 2012. Environmental ecotourism for sustainable development in Sekayu Recreational Forest, Malaysia: Perception from the local communities. Advances in Environmental Biology 6: 2553–2557.
Brandon, K., and R. Margoluis. 1996. Opening address: The bottom line: Getting biodiversity conservation back into ecotourism. In The ecotourism equation: Measuring the impacts, ed. E. Malek-Zadeh, 28–38. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Broadbent, E.N., A.M. ZambranoAlmeyda, R. Dirzo, W.H. Durham, L. Driscoll, P. Gallagher, R. Salters, J. Schultz, A. Colmenares, and R.G. Randolph. 2012. The effects of land use change and ecotourism on biodiversity: A case study of Manuel Antonio, Costa Rica, from 1985 to 2008. Landscape Ecology 27: 731–744.
Brown, S.R. 1980. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Brown, S.R. 1986. On the ratio of Q sorts to statements. Operant subjectivity 9: 96–98.
Chin, C.L.M., S.A. Moore, T.J. Wallington, and R.K. Dowling. 2000. Ecotourism in Bako National Park, Borneo: Visitors’ perspectives on environmental impacts and their management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8: 20–35.
Cunha Costa, C.C., I.S. Sobral Oliveira, and L.J. Gomes. 2010. Environmental perception as strategy for ecotourism in protected areas. Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo 19: 1121–1135. (In Spanish, English Summary).
De Hegedus, P., and M. Vassallo. 2005. Systematization of rural development experiences with emphasis on land use in the municipalities of Montevideo, Paysandu y Tacuarembo. Montevideo, Uruguay: UDELAR-FIDA Mercosur—IICA (In Spanish).
Dietz, T. 2013. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(13): 14081–14087.
Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P.C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1907.
DOF. 2013. Federal Official Gazette. Mexico: Department of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fishing, and Food. Fourth Section, Executive Branch, December 13 (In Spanish).
Fairweather, J.R., and S.R. Swaffield. 2002. Visitors’ and locals’ experiences of Rotorua, New Zealand: An interpretative study using photographs of landscapes and Q method. International Journal of Tourism Research 4: 283–297.
Font, X., and J. Tribe. 2000. Recreation, conservation and timber production: a sustainable relationship? In Forest, tourism and recreation case studies in environmental management, ed. X. Font and J. Tribe, 1–22. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
Foucat, V.S.A. 2002. Community-based ecotourism management moving towards sustainability, in Ventanilla, Oaxaca, Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Management 45: 511–529.
Hunter, W.C. 2013. Understanding resident subjectivities toward tourism using Q method: Orchid Island, Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21: 331–354.
Lai, Po-Hsin, and S.K. Nepal. 2006. Local perspectives of ecotourism development in Tawushan Nature Reserve, Taiwan. Tourism Management 27: 1117–1129.
Lee, C.F., H.I. Huang, and H.R. Yeh. 2010. Developing and evaluation model for destination attractiveness: sustainable forest recreation tourism in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18: 811–828.
Long, P.H. 2012. Tourism impacts and support for tourism development in Ha Long Bay, Vietnam: an examination of residents’ perceptions. Asian Social Science 8: 28–39.
Manning, R.E., and L.E. Anderson. 2012. Managing outdoor recreation. Case studies in National Parks. Cambridge: CABI.
McFarlane, B.L., T.M. Beckley, E. Huddart-Kennedy, S. Nadeau, and S. Wyatt. 2011. Public views on forest management: value orientation and forest dependency as indicators of diversity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 740–749. doi:10.1139/x11-003.
McKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1988. Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Menzies, N.K. 2007. Our forest, your ecosystem, their timber. New York: Columbia University Press.
Münster, D., and U. Münster. 2012. Consuming the forest in an environment of crisis: nature tourism, forest conservation, and neoliberal agriculture in South India. Development and Change 43: 205–227.
Pierce-Colfer, C.J. 2005. The equitable forest: Diversity, community, and resource management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and CIFOR.
Pinheiro, I.d.F.S., V.L.A. Lima, E.M.X. Freire, and A.A. Melo. 2011. Perceptions of a community environmental caatinga on tourism: visions and prospects for tourism planning toward sustainability. Sociedade & Natureza 23: 467–482.
Previte, J., B. Pini, and F. Haslam-McKenzie. 2007. Q methodology and rural research. Sociologia Ruralis 47: 135–147.
Ravnborg, H.M. 2003. Poverty and environmental degradation in the Nicaraguan Hillsides. World Development 31(11): 1933–1946.
Richardson, R.B. 2010. The contribution of tourism to economic growth and food security. Mali: Office of Economic Growth, USAID Mali—Accelarated economic growth team.
Rodriguez-Piñeros, S., and D.K. Lewis. 2013. Analysis and deliberation as a mechanism to assess changes in preferences for indicators of sustainable forest management: A case study in Puebla, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 128: 52–61.
Rodriguez-Piñeros, S., W. Focht, D. Lewis, and D. Montgomery. 2012. Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: An application of Q methodology. Small-scale Forestry 11: 167–183.
SECTUR 2011. Sixth Report. Mexico Secretary of Tourism. Federal Government. Retrieved March 01, 2014, from www.sectur.gob.mx.
Shuifa, K., P. Chenguang, P. Jiahua, Z. Yan, and Z. Ying. 2011. The multiplier effect of the development of forest park tourism on employment creation in China. Journal of Employment Counseling 48: 136–144.
Stem, C.J., J.P. Lassoie, D.R. Lee, D.D. Deshler, and J.W. Schelhas. 2003. Community participation in ecotourism benefits: The link to conservation practices and perspectives. Society and Natural Resources 16: 387–413.
Swinton, S.M., and R. Quiroz. 2003. Is poverty to blame for soil, pasture and forest degradation in Peru’s Altiplano? World Development 31: 1903–1919.
TIES. 1990. The definition. Retrieved March 01, 2014, from http://www.ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism.
Tsaur, S.-H., Y.-C. Lin, and J.-H. Lin. 2006. Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism. Tourism Management 27(4): 640–653.
Van Exel, N.J.A., and G. de Graaf. 2005. Q methodology: A sneak preview. http://www.jobvanexel.nl. Accessed Dec 2012.
Vugteveen, P., H.J. Rob, L.A. Devilee, S.E.W. Leuven, J.H.M. van der Veeren, A. Wiering, and A. Hendriks. 2010. Stakeholder value orientations in water management. Society and Natural Resources 23: 805–821.
Webler, T., S. Danielson, and S. Tuler. 2009. Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
Wunder, S. 2000. Ecotourism and economic incentives: An empirical approach. Ecological Economics 32: 465–479.
XOLA. 2009. Adventure travel assessment report in Mexico. México: Adventure Industry Consultants (In Spanish).
Yanza, E.A., 2012. Designing a model for comunity-based ecotourism development in the rural area of Coroneo, Guanajuato. Revista Electrónica de Divulgación de la Investigación, 03: junio–noviembre (In Spanish).
Acknowledgments
We want to express our gratitude to El Programa Profesor Humanista Internacional Multidisciplinario and the Posgrados en Agronegocios y Dirección de Organizaciones at UPAEP for sponsoring this project. Special thanks to the members of the community La Preciosita for their willingness to participate. We also thank our anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that greatly improved this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez-Piñeros, S., Mayett-Moreno, Y. Forest owners’ perceptions of ecotourism: Integrating community values and forest conservation. AMBIO 44, 99–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0544-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0544-5