Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forest owners’ perceptions of ecotourism: Integrating community values and forest conservation

  • Report
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of forest land for ecotourism has been well accepted due to its ability to provide income to local people and to conserve the forest. Preparing the forest with infrastructure to attract and educate visitors has been reported of importance. This study applied Q methodology in a small rural community of the State of Puebla, Mexico, to reveal forest owners’ perceptions to build infrastructure in their forest as part of their ecotourism project. It also discloses forest owners’ underlying motives to use their forest for ecotourism. Ecotourism is perceived as a complementary activity to farming that would allow women to be involved in community development. Low impact infrastructure is desired due to forest owners’ perception to preserve the forest for the overall community well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. According to 2006 statistics, 32 % of the population of the village, in particularly young adults, migrated to the United States.

  2. This forest land is separated from the land (ejido) that the government granted to farmers, which is called “tierra ejidal or ejido.”

  3. Due to migration of some of the principal and secondary owners, it was necessary to include immediately family members who are empowered by forest owners to participate in meetings and projects, while they are away.

References

  • Adam, J.H., S.T. Chong, A.C. Er, N. Lyndon, R. Moorthy, and S. Selvadurai. 2012. Perception of local community towards community-based ecotourism. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 6: 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa-Polanco, S., D. Molina, G. Escalona-Segura, and E. Bello. 2010. Organization and ecotourism in ejidos of the Mexican southeast region. Revista Estudio Agrarios 44: 141–160 (In Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Batta, R.N. 2006. Evaluating ecotourism in mountain areas: A study of three Himalayan destinations. International Review of Environmental Strategies 6: 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, K., W. Adamowicz, D. Keeshaw, and C. Messier. 2010. Sustainable forest management preferences of interest groups in three regions with different levels of industrial forestry: An exploratory attribute-based choice experiment. Environmental Management 46: 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, M.A.H., S. Chamhuri, I. ShaharuddinMohamad, and I. Rabiul. 2012. Environmental ecotourism for sustainable development in Sekayu Recreational Forest, Malaysia: Perception from the local communities. Advances in Environmental Biology 6: 2553–2557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, K., and R. Margoluis. 1996. Opening address: The bottom line: Getting biodiversity conservation back into ecotourism. In The ecotourism equation: Measuring the impacts, ed. E. Malek-Zadeh, 28–38. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, E.N., A.M. ZambranoAlmeyda, R. Dirzo, W.H. Durham, L. Driscoll, P. Gallagher, R. Salters, J. Schultz, A. Colmenares, and R.G. Randolph. 2012. The effects of land use change and ecotourism on biodiversity: A case study of Manuel Antonio, Costa Rica, from 1985 to 2008. Landscape Ecology 27: 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.R. 1980. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.R. 1986. On the ratio of Q sorts to statements. Operant subjectivity 9: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C.L.M., S.A. Moore, T.J. Wallington, and R.K. Dowling. 2000. Ecotourism in Bako National Park, Borneo: Visitors’ perspectives on environmental impacts and their management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8: 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha Costa, C.C., I.S. Sobral Oliveira, and L.J. Gomes. 2010. Environmental perception as strategy for ecotourism in protected areas. Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo 19: 1121–1135. (In Spanish, English Summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hegedus, P., and M. Vassallo. 2005. Systematization of rural development experiences with emphasis on land use in the municipalities of Montevideo, Paysandu y Tacuarembo. Montevideo, Uruguay: UDELAR-FIDA Mercosur—IICA (In Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T. 2013. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(13): 14081–14087.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P.C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DOF. 2013. Federal Official Gazette. Mexico: Department of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fishing, and Food. Fourth Section, Executive Branch, December 13 (In Spanish).

  • Fairweather, J.R., and S.R. Swaffield. 2002. Visitors’ and locals’ experiences of Rotorua, New Zealand: An interpretative study using photographs of landscapes and Q method. International Journal of Tourism Research 4: 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Font, X., and J. Tribe. 2000. Recreation, conservation and timber production: a sustainable relationship? In Forest, tourism and recreation case studies in environmental management, ed. X. Font and J. Tribe, 1–22. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucat, V.S.A. 2002. Community-based ecotourism management moving towards sustainability, in Ventanilla, Oaxaca, Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Management 45: 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W.C. 2013. Understanding resident subjectivities toward tourism using Q method: Orchid Island, Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21: 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Po-Hsin, and S.K. Nepal. 2006. Local perspectives of ecotourism development in Tawushan Nature Reserve, Taiwan. Tourism Management 27: 1117–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.F., H.I. Huang, and H.R. Yeh. 2010. Developing and evaluation model for destination attractiveness: sustainable forest recreation tourism in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18: 811–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, P.H. 2012. Tourism impacts and support for tourism development in Ha Long Bay, Vietnam: an examination of residents’ perceptions. Asian Social Science 8: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R.E., and L.E. Anderson. 2012. Managing outdoor recreation. Case studies in National Parks. Cambridge: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, B.L., T.M. Beckley, E. Huddart-Kennedy, S. Nadeau, and S. Wyatt. 2011. Public views on forest management: value orientation and forest dependency as indicators of diversity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 740–749. doi:10.1139/x11-003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1988. Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, N.K. 2007. Our forest, your ecosystem, their timber. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münster, D., and U. Münster. 2012. Consuming the forest in an environment of crisis: nature tourism, forest conservation, and neoliberal agriculture in South India. Development and Change 43: 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce-Colfer, C.J. 2005. The equitable forest: Diversity, community, and resource management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, I.d.F.S., V.L.A. Lima, E.M.X. Freire, and A.A. Melo. 2011. Perceptions of a community environmental caatinga on tourism: visions and prospects for tourism planning toward sustainability. Sociedade & Natureza 23: 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Previte, J., B. Pini, and F. Haslam-McKenzie. 2007. Q methodology and rural research. Sociologia Ruralis 47: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravnborg, H.M. 2003. Poverty and environmental degradation in the Nicaraguan Hillsides. World Development 31(11): 1933–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.B. 2010. The contribution of tourism to economic growth and food security. Mali: Office of Economic Growth, USAID Mali—Accelarated economic growth team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Piñeros, S., and D.K. Lewis. 2013. Analysis and deliberation as a mechanism to assess changes in preferences for indicators of sustainable forest management: A case study in Puebla, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 128: 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Piñeros, S., W. Focht, D. Lewis, and D. Montgomery. 2012. Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: An application of Q methodology. Small-scale Forestry 11: 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SECTUR 2011. Sixth Report. Mexico Secretary of Tourism. Federal Government. Retrieved March 01, 2014, from www.sectur.gob.mx.

  • Shuifa, K., P. Chenguang, P. Jiahua, Z. Yan, and Z. Ying. 2011. The multiplier effect of the development of forest park tourism on employment creation in China. Journal of Employment Counseling 48: 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stem, C.J., J.P. Lassoie, D.R. Lee, D.D. Deshler, and J.W. Schelhas. 2003. Community participation in ecotourism benefits: The link to conservation practices and perspectives. Society and Natural Resources 16: 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S.M., and R. Quiroz. 2003. Is poverty to blame for soil, pasture and forest degradation in Peru’s Altiplano? World Development 31: 1903–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TIES. 1990. The definition. Retrieved March 01, 2014, from http://www.ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism.

  • Tsaur, S.-H., Y.-C. Lin, and J.-H. Lin. 2006. Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism. Tourism Management 27(4): 640–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Exel, N.J.A., and G. de Graaf. 2005. Q methodology: A sneak preview. http://www.jobvanexel.nl. Accessed Dec 2012.

  • Vugteveen, P., H.J. Rob, L.A. Devilee, S.E.W. Leuven, J.H.M. van der Veeren, A. Wiering, and A. Hendriks. 2010. Stakeholder value orientations in water management. Society and Natural Resources 23: 805–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webler, T., S. Danielson, and S. Tuler. 2009. Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S. 2000. Ecotourism and economic incentives: An empirical approach. Ecological Economics 32: 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • XOLA. 2009. Adventure travel assessment report in Mexico. México: Adventure Industry Consultants (In Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanza, E.A., 2012. Designing a model for comunity-based ecotourism development in the rural area of Coroneo, Guanajuato. Revista Electrónica de Divulgación de la Investigación, 03: junio–noviembre (In Spanish).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to express our gratitude to El Programa Profesor Humanista Internacional Multidisciplinario and the Posgrados en Agronegocios y Dirección de Organizaciones at UPAEP for sponsoring this project. Special thanks to the members of the community La Preciosita for their willingness to participate. We also thank our anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that greatly improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez-Piñeros, S., Mayett-Moreno, Y. Forest owners’ perceptions of ecotourism: Integrating community values and forest conservation. AMBIO 44, 99–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0544-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0544-5

Keywords

Navigation