Linking Cellulose Fiber Sediment Methyl Mercury Levels to Organic Matter Decay and Major Element Composition
Methylation of mercury (Hg) to highly toxic methyl Hg (MeHg), a process known to occur when organic matter (OM) decomposition leads to anoxia, is considered a worldwide threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health. We measured temporal and spatial variations in sediment MeHg, total Hg (THg), and major elements in a freshwater lagoon in Sweden polluted with Hg-laden cellulose fibers. Fiber decomposition, confined to a narrow surface layer, resulted in loss of carbon (C), uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulfur (S), and increased MeHg levels. Notably, fiber decomposition and subsequent erosion of fiber residues will cause buried contaminants to gradually come closer to the sediment–water interface. At an adjacent site where decomposed fiber accumulated, there was a gain in C and a loss of S when MeHg increased. As evidenced by correlation patterns and vertical chemical profiles, reduced S may have fueled C-fixation and Hg methylation at this site.
KeywordsMercury Methylation Cellulose fiber Decomposition Major element cycles
This study was part of a project initiated and run by the Kalmar County Administration and financed by the Swedish EPA. We thank the project manager Anna Aleljung and also Tommy Hammar, Kalmar County Administration and Bo Troedsson, Eman Catchment Management Association for taking part in the planning of the project and for providing equipment for field measurement and field sampling. As always, the mercury laboratory at IVL, Gothenburg determined mercury and methyl mercury with high accuracy and precision.
- Bertics, V.J., J.A. Sohm, T. Treude, C.-E.T. Chow, D.G. Capone, J.A. Fuhrman, and W. Ziebis. 2010. Burrowing deeper into benthic nitrogen cycling: The impact of bioturbation on nitrogen fixation coupled to sulfate reduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 409: 1–15. doi: 10.3354/meps08639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Compeau, G.C., and R. Bartha. 1985. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: Principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 50: 498–502.Google Scholar
- Fenchel, T., and B.J. Finlay. 1995. Ecology and evolution in anoxic worlds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Handley, K.M., N.C. VerBerkmoes, C.I. Steefel, K.H. Williams, I. Sharon, C.S. Miller, K.R. Frischkorn, K. Chourey, et al. 2013. Biostimulation induces syntrophic interactions that impact C, S and N cycling in a sediment microbial community. The ISME Journal 7: 800–816. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hultgren, P. 2000. Maringeologisk undersökning av Nötöfjärden, Oskarshamns kommun. Department of Marine Geology. Göteborg University (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Naturvårdsverket. 1995. Branschkartläggningen: en översiktlig kartläggning av efterbehandlingsbehovet i Sverige. Rapport 4393. Naturvårdsverkets förlag. ISBN 91-620-4393-5 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Pak, K.-R., and R. Bartha. 1998. Mercury methylation by interspecies hydrogen and acetate transfer between sulfidogens and methanogens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 1987–1990.Google Scholar
- Rozan, T.F., M. Taillefert, R.E. Trouwborst, B.T. Glazer, S. Ma, J. Herszage, L.M. Valdes, K.S. Price, et al. 2002. Iron–sulfur–phosphorus cycling in the sediment of a shallow coastal bay: Implications for sediment nutrient release and benthic macroalgal blooms. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1346–1354. doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.5.1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skyllberg, U. 2008. Competition among thiols and inorganic sulfides and polysulfides for Hg and MeHg in wetlands soils and sediments under suboxic conditions: Illumination of controversies and implications for MeHg net production. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: G00C03. doi: 10.1029/2008JG000745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Travnikov, O., I. Ilyin, O. Rozovskaya, M. Varygina, W. Aas, H.T. Uggerud, K. Mareckova, and R. Wankmueller. 2012. Long-term changes of heavy metal transboundary pollution of the environment (1990–2010). EMEP contribution to the revision of the heavy metal protocol. EMEP Status Report 2/2012.Google Scholar