, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 770–778 | Cite as

Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions

  • Kathleen Carmel Buckingham
  • Liangru Wu
  • Yiping Lou


Over the centuries, governments and international agencies have developed a wide range of institutions to manage timber resources and conserve values provided by treed lands. Concerns regarding the sustainable supply of timber have provided opportunities for the development of substitute resources; however, bamboo and other non-timber forest resources have not been a part of the development of these institutions. Bamboo is a unique Non-Timber Forest Product, as it is often classified as forest or timber, and therefore must adhere to the same regulations as timber. Given the recent global expansion of bamboo, it is timely to examine the interplay between bamboo and the traditional institutions of forest governance. This paper aims to contribute to debates regarding cognitive institutional constraints on the development of substitute natural resources using bamboo as a case study, with specific focus on the applicability of Forest Stewardship Council certification, timber legality verification and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to bamboos.


Bamboo Forestry Forest certification REDD+ Timber legality verification Institutions 



With thanks to Paul Jepson, Graeme Auld and Constance McDermott for their input into the DPhil thesis version of this article.


  1. Adamson, W.C., G.A. White, H.T. Derigo, and W.O. Hawley. 1978. Bamboo Production Research at Savannah, Georgia, 1956–77. USDA-ARS-S-176. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
  2. Arts, B., and M. Buizer. 2009. Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 11: 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, R. 2012. Andrex rolls out bamboo toilet tissue, Marketing Week. Retrieved 20 March, 2012, from
  4. Bieri, M., and A. Nygren. 2011. The challenges of certifying tropical community forests: A case study from Honduras. The Journal of Environment and Development 20: 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckingham, K., P. Jepson, L. Wu, I.V. Rao, S. Jiang, W. Liese, Y. Lou, and M. Fu. 2011. The potential of bamboo is constrained by outmoded policy frames. AMBIO 40: 544–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cashore, B., and M.W. Stone. 2012. Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy and Economics 18: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cashore, B., G. Galloway, F. Cubbage, D. Humphreys, P. Katila, K. Levin, A. Maryundi, C. McDermott, et al. 2010. Chapter 23: Ability of institutions to address new challenges. In Forests and society—Responding to global drivers of change, ed. G. Mery, P. Katila, G. Galloway, R.I. Alfaro, M. Kanninen, M. Lobovikov, and J. Varjo. Vienna: IUFRO-WFSE Publication.Google Scholar
  8. Crosby, A.W. 2004. Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe. Studies in Environment and History, 2nd ed, 900–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cubbage, F., S. Koesbandana, P. MacDonagh, R. Rubilar, G. Balmelli, V.M. Olmos, R. De la Torre, M. Murara, et al. 2010. Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 1667–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eggleston, H.S., L. Buendia, et al. (eds.). 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Institute for Global Environmental Studies (IGES). Hayama, Japan: IGES.Google Scholar
  11. FAO. 2009. Meeting the challenge of timber legality verification. FAO and VERIFOR.Google Scholar
  12. FAO. 2011. State of the World’s Forests. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. 1966. The order of things. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. FSC. 2005. Minutes of the 4th FSC General Assembly of the Forest Stewardship Council, Manaus, Brazil 7–9 December, 2005. Forest Stewardship Council, BonnGoogle Scholar
  15. FSC. 2010. FSC-DIR-20-007–FSC Directive on FSC Forest Management Evaluations. Forest Stewardship Council Report, BonnGoogle Scholar
  16. FSC. 2012. Retrieved February 21, 2013, from
  17. Fu, M., and Y.P. Lou. 2002. Prospects of research on sustainable management techniques of bamboo forests in China. In Bamboo for sustainable development, ed. A. Kumar, R. Rao, and C. Sastry. Zeist: INBAR/VSP.Google Scholar
  18. Halsey, M. 1997. The wood for the paper: Old-growth forest, hemp and environmental harm Australian & New Zealand. Journal of Criminology 30: 121–148.Google Scholar
  19. Head, L., and J. Atchinson. 2008. Cultural ecology: Emerging human–plant geographies. Progress in Human Geography 33(2): 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinrichs, A. 2011. Illegal logging and changing markets: The need for timber legality assurance systems, 2nd Sub-Regional Training Workshop on Timber Legality Assurance Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 25–27 October 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Hobhouse, H. 2004. Seeds of wealth: Four plants that made men rich. London: Pan Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffman, A.J., and M.J. Ventresca. 1999. The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. American Behavioral Scientist 42(8): 1368–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter, I.R. 2002. Bamboo—Solution to problems. Journal of Bamboo and Rattan 1(2): 101–107. doi: 10.1163/156915902760181577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. INBAR. 2003. Greening Red Earth. Beijing: INBAR.Google Scholar
  25. INBAR. 2012. Bamboo value chains and inclusive green growth. In World Bamboo Congress, ed. C. Hoogendorn, Antwerp, 12th April 2012.Google Scholar
  26. James, N.D.G. 1990. A history of English forestry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Jiang, Z. (ed.). 2007. Bamboo and rattan in the world, 86. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.Google Scholar
  28. Kanowski, P.J., C.L. McDermott, and B.W. Cashore. 2011. Implementing REDD+: Lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science & Policy 14: 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klooster, D. 2010. Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council’s plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum 41: 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar, A., and C. Sastry. 1999. The International Network for Bamboo and Rattan. Non-wood Forest Products and Income Generation (FAO), vol. 50, No. 198.Google Scholar
  31. Li, Z.H., and M. Kobayashi. 2004. Plantation future of bamboo in China. Journal of Forestry Research 15: 233–242. (in Chinese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lobovikov, M., D. Schoene, and Y. Lou. 2012. Bamboo in climate change and rural livelihoods. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17: 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McClure, F.A. 1966. The bamboos: A fresh perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. PR Newswire. 2013. Pendrell Acquires Majority Stake In Biosciences Innovator Booshoot. Retrieved February 2, 2013, from
  36. Radkau, J. 1997. The wordy worship of nature and the tacit feeling for nature in the history of German forestry. In Nature and society in historical context, ed. M. Teich, R. Porter, and B. Gustafsson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rao, I.V.R., B. Motukuri, and S. Karpe. 2009. Breaking barriers and creating capital: Sustainable development with bamboo in the Konkan Region. India: Maharashtra.Google Scholar
  38. Schiebinger, L. 2004. Plants and empire: Colonial bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sethi, N. 2011. It’s a grass, not a tree Bamboo off-shoots. The Times of India, January 21.Google Scholar
  42. Shananker, R.U., K.N. Ganeshaiah, K. Srinivasan, V.R. Rao, and L.T. Hong. 2004. Bamboos and rattans of the Western Ghats. Population Biology, Socio-economics and Conservation Strategies, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE).Google Scholar
  43. Sutton, W.R.J. 1999. The need for planted forests and the example of radiate pine. New Forests 17: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, J.T. 1994. Introduction. In Priority species of bamboo and rattan, ed. A.N. Rao, V.R. Rao, and J.T. Williams. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR), Biodiversity International.Google Scholar
  45. Woodridge, M. 2012. Booming bamboo: The next super-material? BBC News Magazine, BBC News, Nicaragua, 3 April 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Xu, Q., and P. Jiang. 2008. Soil microbial functional diversity under intensively managed bamboo plantations in southern China. Journal of Soils and Sediments 8(3): 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang, Y., and C. Hui. 2010. China’s Bamboo: Culture/Resources/Cultivation/Utilization; INBAR Technical Report No. 33. INBAR, Southwest Forestry University.Google Scholar
  48. Young, E.M. 2005. Revival of industrial hemp: A systematic analysis of the current global industry to determine limitations and identify future potentials within the concept of sustainability. Master’s Degree of International Environmental Science. Sweden: Lund University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Carmel Buckingham
    • 1
  • Liangru Wu
    • 2
  • Yiping Lou
    • 3
  1. 1.World Resources InstituteWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.China National Bamboo Research CentreHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.The International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR)BeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations