Exploring Patterns of Seafood Provision Revealed in the Global Ocean Health Index
- 511 Downloads
Sustainable provision of seafood from wild-capture fisheries and mariculture is a fundamental component of healthy marine ecosystems and a major component of the Ocean Health Index. Here we critically review the food provision model of the Ocean Health Index, and explore the implications of knowledge gaps, scale of analysis, choice of reference points, measures of sustainability, and quality of input data. Global patterns for fisheries are positively related to human development and latitude, whereas patterns for mariculture are most closely associated with economic importance of seafood. Sensitivity analyses show that scores are robust to several model assumptions, but highly sensitive to choice of reference points and, for fisheries, extent of time series available to estimate landings. We show how results for sustainable seafood may be interpreted and used, and we evaluate which modifications show the greatest potential for improvements.
KeywordsIndicator Status Assessment Fisheries Mariculture Aquaculture Seafood FAO
Beau and Heather Wrigley provided the founding grant for the original Ocean Health Index work. Additional financial and in-kind support was provided by the Pacific Life Foundation, the Thomas W. Haas Fund, the Oak Foundation, the Akiko Shiraki Dynner Fund, Darden Restaurants Inc. Foundation, Conservation International, New England Aquarium, National Geographic, and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS). This is a contribution from the NCEAS Ecosystem Health Working Group and the Sea Around Us project, a collaboration between The University of British Columbia and The Pew Charitable Trusts. We thank A. Tavakolie for assistance with some of the indices. MC was supported by a Marie-Curie CIG Fellowships and a research contract of the Ramon y Cajal program of the Spanish Government.
- Branch, T.A., D.J. Hively, and R. Hilborn. 2013. Is the ocean food provision index biased? Nature 495: E5–E6.Google Scholar
- Charles, A.T., R.F. Agbayani, E.C. Agbayani, M. Agüero, E.T. Belleza, E. González, B. Stomal, and J.-Y. Weigel. 1997. Aquaculture economics in developing countries: Regional assessments and an annotated bibliography. FAO Fisheries Circular No 932, Rome, Italy, FAO, 401 pp.Google Scholar
- CIESIN. 2012. National aggregates of geospatial data collection: Population, landscape, and climate estimates, Version 3 (PLACE III). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NYGoogle Scholar
- Edwards, P. 1997. Sustainable food production through aquaculture. Aquaculture Asia 2: 4–7.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 197 pp.Google Scholar
- Halpern, B.S., C. Longo, D. Hardy, K.L. McLeod, J.F. Samhouri, S.K. Katona, K. Kleisner, S.E. Lester, et al. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488: 615–620.Google Scholar
- Link, J.S., S. Gaichas, T.J. Miller, T. Essington, A. Bundy, J. Boldt, K.F. Drinkwater, and E. Moksness. 2012. Synthesizing lessons learned from comparing fisheries production in 13 northern hemisphere ecosystems: Emergent fundamental features. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 459: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martell, S., and R. Froese. 2012. A simple method for estimating MSY from catch and resilience. Fish and Fisheries. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00485.x.
- Mora, C., R.A. Myers, M. Coll, S. Libralato, T.J. Pitcher, R.U. Sumaila, D. Zeller, R. Watson, et al. 2009. Management effectiveness of the world’s marine fisheries. PLoS Biology 7: e1000131.Google Scholar
- Pauly, D., D. Belhabib, R. Blomeyer, W.W.L. Cheung, A.M. Cisneros-Montemayor, D. Copeland, S. Harper, V.W.Y. Lam, et al. 2013a. China’s distant-water fisheries in the 21st century. Fish and Fisheries. doi: 10.1111/faf.12032.
- Trujillo, P. 2008. Using a mariculture sustainability index to rank countries’ performances. In A comparative assessment of biodiversity, fisheries, and aquaculture in 53 countries’ Exclusive Economic Zones Fisheries Centre Research Reports 16(7), ed. J. Alder, and D. Pauly. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
- UNDP. 2011. Human Development Report 2011, sustainability and equity: A better future for all, 178 pp. New York: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
- Zeller, D., and D. Pauly (eds.). 2007. Reconstruction of marine fisheries catches for key countries and regions (1950–2005). Fisheries Centre Research Reports 15(2): 163.Google Scholar