Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial Assessment of Attitudes Toward Tigers in Nepal

  • Report
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many regions around the world, wildlife impacts on people (e.g., crop raiding, attacks on people) engender negative attitudes toward wildlife. Negative attitudes predict behaviors that undermine wildlife management and conservation efforts (e.g., by exacerbating retaliatory killing of wildlife). Our study (1) evaluated attitudes of local people toward the globally endangered tiger (Panthera tigris) in Nepal’s Chitwan National Park; and (2) modeled and mapped spatial clusters of attitudes toward tigers. Factors characterizing a person’s position in society (i.e., socioeconomic and cultural factors) influenced attitudes toward tigers more than past experiences with tigers (e.g., livestock attacks). A spatial cluster of negative attitudes toward tigers was associated with concentrations of people with less formal education, people from marginalized ethnic groups, and tiger attacks on people. Our study provides insights and descriptions of techniques to improve attitudes toward wildlife in Chitwan and many regions around the world with similar conservation challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Agrawal, A., and E. Ostrom. 2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society 29: 485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar, G.D., and M.J. Farnworth. 2012. Stray cats in Auckland, New Zealand: Discovering geographic information for exploratory spatial analysis. Applied Geography 34: 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjunan, M., C. Holmes, J.P. Puyravaud, and P. Davidar. 2006. Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 188–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W.G., and D.J. Ghimire. 2007. Social organization, population, and land use. Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, MI, USA.

  • Barber, J.S., G.P. Shivakoti, W.G. Axinn, and K. Gajurel. 1997. Sampling strategies for rural settings: A detailed example from the Chitwan Valley Family Study, Nepal. Nepal Population Journal 6: 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearer, S., M. Linderman, J. Huang, L. An, G. He, and J. Liu. 2008. Effects of fuelwood collection and timber harvesting on giant panda habitat use. Biological Conservation 141: 385–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddlecom, A.E., W.G. Axinn, and J.S. Barber. 2005. Environmental effects on family size preferences and subsequent reproductive behavior in Nepal. Population and Environment 26: 583–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke, T., J. Vitterso, and B.P. Kaltenborn. 2000. Locus of control and attitudes toward large carnivores. Psychological Reports 86: 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohra, P., and D.S. Massey. 2009. Processes of internal and international migration from Chitwan, Nepal. International Migration Review 43: 621–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, J.L., B.D. Leopold, F.J. Vilella, D.A. Gill, and H.A. Jacobson. 2001. Attitudes of landowners toward American black bears compared between areas of high and low bear populations. Ursus 12: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, J.L., B.D. Leopold, F.J. Vilella, and D.A. Gill. 2004. A spatially explicit model, derived from demographic variables, to predict attitudes toward black bear restoration. Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.H., S.J. Riley, and J. Liu. 2012a. Utility of a psychological framework for carnivore conservation. Oryx 46: 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.H., B.K. Shrestha, J.B. Karki, N.M.B. Pradhan, and J. Liu. 2012b. Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 15360–15365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chardonnet, P., B. Soto, H. Fritz, W. Crosmary, N. Drouet-Hoguet, P. Mésochina, M. Pellerin, D. Mallon, L. Bakker, and H. Boulet. 2010. Managing the conflicts between people and lion: Review and insights from the literature and field experience. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Wildlife Management Working Paper 13.

  • Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, A.J., E.A. Macdonald, and D.W. Macdonald. 2011. A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 13937–13944.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirgha, J., and W.G. Axinn. 2006. Family change in Nepal: Evidence from western Chitwan. Contributions to Nepalese Studies 33: 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, G., and T.A. Heberlein. 2003. Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biological Conservation 111: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, D.C., M.J. Manfredo, and J. Lipscomb. 1996. Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd, M.E. 2005. Conservation outside of parks: Attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32: 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A., and J. Ord. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 24: 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, S., and P.C. Lee. 1999. The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 26: 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Nepal. 1993. Fourth amendment to the national parks and wildlife conservation act (2029). Nepal Gazette, 43(Suppl.).

  • Gurung, B., J.L.D. Smith, C. McDougal, J.B. Karki, and A. Barlow. 2008. Factors associated with human-killing tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Biological Conservation 141: 3069–3078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurung, B., K.C. Nelson, and J.L.D. Smith. 2009. Impact of grazing restrictions on livestock composition and husbandry practices in Madi Valley, Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 36: 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J.T. 1993. Park-people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: A socio-economic analysis. Environmental Conservation 20: 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inskip, C., and A. Zimmermann. 2009. Human-felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx 43: 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, J., and M. Sjöström. 2007. Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biological Conservation 137: 610–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, J., and M. Sjöström. 2011. Subsidized fencing of livestock as a means of increasing tolerance for wolves. Ecology and Society 16: 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S.R., and J.K. Berry. 1987. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15: 363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissui, B.M. 2008. Livestock predation by lions, leopards, spotted hyenas, and their vulnerability to retaliatory killing in the Maasai steppe, Tanzania. Animal Conservation 11: 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurie, A. 1982. Behavioural ecology of the Greater one horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Journal of Zoology 196: 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk, C.A., C.H. Flather, V.C. Radeloff, A.M. Pidgeon, R.B. Hammer, and J. Liu. 2008. Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance. Conservation Biology 22: 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman, M.A., L. An, S. Bearer, G. He, Z. Ouyang, and J. Liu. 2005. Modeling the spatio-temporal dynamics and interactions of households, landscapes, and giant panda habitat. Ecological Modelling 183: 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., T. Dietz, S.R. Carpenter, M. Alberti, C. Folke, E. Moran, A.N. Pell, P. Deadman, et al. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317: 1513–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., V. Hull, A.T. Morzillo, and J.A. Wiens (eds.). 2011. Sources, sinks and sustainability. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., N. Williams, W.G. Axinn, and D.J. Ghimire. 2010. Community services and out-migration. International Migration 48: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., and J.A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, J.N., and S.R. Kellert. 1998. Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: A case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environmental Conservation 25: 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, T., R.H. Emslie, and B. Talukdar. 2009. African and Asian Rhinoceroses—Status, conservation and trade. IUCN Species Survival Commission Report (CoP15 Doc. 45.1 Annex).

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morzillo, A.T., and M.D. Schwartz. 2011. Landscape characteristics affect animal control by urban residents. Ecosphere 2. doi:10.1890/ES1811-00120.00121.

  • Morzillo, A.T., A.G. Mertig, N. Garner, and J. Liu. 2007. Spatial distribution of attitudes toward proposed management strategies for a wildlife recovery. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12: 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morzillo, A.T., A.G. Mertig, J.W. Hollister, N. Garner, and J. Liu. 2010. Socioeconomic factors affecting local support for black bear recovery strategies. Environmental Management 45: 1299–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muter, B.A., M.L. Gore, and S.J. Riley. 2013. Social contagion of risk perceptions in environmental management networks. Risk Analysis. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01936.x.

  • Naughton-Treves, L., and A. Treves. 2005. Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: Crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. In People and wildlife: Conflict or co-existence?, ed. R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz, 252–277. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves, L., R. Grossberg, and A. Treves. 2003. Paying for tolerance: Rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conservation Biology 17: 1500–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal Central Bureau of Statistics. 2012. Nepal census information site. https://sites.google.com/site/nepalcensus. Accessed 1 Aug 2011.

  • Nepal, S.K., and K.E. Weber. 1995. Prospects for coexistence: Wildlife and local people. AMBIO 24: 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal Survey Department. 1996. Ministry of land reform and management. Survey Department. http://www.dos.gov.np. Accessed 15 May 2012.

  • Newmark, W.D., N.L. Leonard, H.I. Sariko, and D.-G.M. Gamassa. 1993. Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 63: 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus, P.J., S.A. Osofsky, P. Ferraro, F. Madden, and H. Fischer. 2005. Bearing the costs of human–wildlife conflict: The challenges of compensation schemes. In People and wildlife: Conflict or co-existence?, ed. R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz, 107–121. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R.M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41: 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogada, M.O., R. Woodroffe, N.O. Oguge, and L.G. Frank. 2003. Limiting depredation by African carnivores: The role of livestock husbandry. Conservation Biology 17: 1521–1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S.J., and D.J. Decker. 2000a. Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S.J., and D.J. Decker. 2000b. Wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 931–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romañach, S.S., P.A. Lindsey, and R. Woodroffe. 2007. Determinants of attitudes towards predators in central Kenya and suggestions for increasing tolerance in livestock dominated landscapes. Oryx 41: 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberwal, V.K., J.P. Gibbs, R. Chellam, and A.J.T. Johnsingh. 1994. Lion–human conflict in the Gir forest, India. Conservation Biology 8: 501–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, U.R. 1990. An overview of park–people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning 19: 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirkin, R.M. 2005. Statistics for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitati, N.W., M.J. Walpole, R.J. Smith, and N. Leader Williams. 2003. Predicting spatial aspects of human–elephant conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. 2007. Final evaluation: Landscape-scale conservation of the endangered tiger and rhino populations in and around Chitwan National Park. United Nations Development Programme.

  • United Nations. 2010. World population prospects: The 2010 revision. http://esa.un.org/wpp/unpp/panel_population.htm. Accessed 1 Aug 2012.

  • Walston, J., J.G. Robinson, E.L. Bennett, U. Breitenmoser, G.A.B. da Fonseca, J. Goodrich, M. Gumal, L. Hunter, A. Johnson, and K.U. Karanth. 2010. Bringing the tiger back from the brink—The six percent solution. PLoS Biology 8: 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.W., J.P. Lassoie, and P.D. Curtis. 2006. Farmer attitudes towards conservation in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Environmental Conservation 33: 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikramanayake, E., E. Dinerstein, J. Seidensticker, S. Lumpkin, B. Pandav, M. Shrestha, H. Mishra, J. Ballou, et al. 2011. A landscape based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population. Conservation Letters 4: 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.K., G. Ericsson, and T.A. Heberlein. 2002. A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972–2000). Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 575–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe, R. 2001. Strategies for carnivore conservation: Lessons from contemporary extinctions. In Carnivore conservation, ed. J.L. Gittleman, S. Funk, D.W. Macdonald, and R.K. Wayne, 61–92. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe, R., and J.R. Ginsberg. 1998. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280: 2126–2128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe, R., S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz (eds.). 2005. People and wildlife: Conflict or co-existence?. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2011. World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

  • Yabiku, S.T. 2005. The effect of non-family experiences on age of marriage in a setting of rapid social change. Population Studies 59: 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., N. Baker, C. Inskip, J.D.C. Linnell, S. Marchini, J. Odden, G. Rasmussen, and A. Treves. 2010. Contemporary views of human–carnivore conflicts on wild rangelands. In Wild rangelands: Conserving wildlife while maintaining livestock in semi-arid ecosystems, eds. J. du Toit, R. Kock, and J. Deutsch, 129. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Zimmermann, A., M. Walpole, and N. Leader-Williams. 2005. Cattle ranchers’ attitudes to conflicts with jaguars in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx 39: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H.C., M.J. Manfredo, and J.J. Vaske. 2000. Social psychological bases for stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge our colleagues in the Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability at Michigan State University and the Institute for Social and Environmental Research-Nepal in Chitwan for their contributions to this article. Research was supported by a grant from the US Fish and Wildlife Service Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Fund, National Science Foundation (Partnerships in International Research and Education, Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program), and fellowships from Michigan State University and NASA’s Earth and Space Science program. We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil H. Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, N.H., Riley, S.J., Shortridge, A. et al. Spatial Assessment of Attitudes Toward Tigers in Nepal. AMBIO 43, 125–137 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0421-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0421-7

Keywords

Navigation