Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 260–274 | Cite as

The Historical Dynamics of Social–Ecological Traps

  • Wiebren J. Boonstra
  • Florianne W. de Boer
Review

Abstract

Environmental degradation is a typical unintended outcome of collective human behavior. Hardin’s metaphor of the “tragedy of the commons” has become a conceived wisdom that captures the social dynamics leading to environmental degradation. Recently, “traps” has gained currency as an alternative concept to explain the rigidity of social and ecological processes that produce environmental degradation and livelihood impoverishment. The trap metaphor is, however, a great deal more complex compared to Hardin’s insight. This paper takes stock of studies using the trap metaphor. It argues that the concept includes time and history in the analysis, but only as background conditions and not as a factor of causality. From a historical–sociological perspective this is remarkable since social–ecological traps are clearly path-dependent processes, which are causally produced through a conjunction of events. To prove this point the paper conceptualizes social–ecological traps as a process instead of a condition, and systematically compares history and timing in one classic and three recent studies of social–ecological traps. Based on this comparison it concludes that conjunction of social and environmental events contributes profoundly to the production of trap processes. The paper further discusses the implications of this conclusion for policy intervention and outlines how future research might generalize insights from historical–sociological studies of traps.

Keywords

Social–ecological traps Path dependency Agricultural involution Gilded trap Dryland poverty trap Lock-in trap 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Oonsie Biggs and Elin Enfors for taking the time to discuss ideas for this article with us. Florianne de Boer also wants to thank Oonsie Biggs for inviting her to the Stockholm Resilience Centre in May 2012. We also would like to thank Aron Hejdstöm for making Figs. 37, and Fredrik Moberg for Fig. 8. Wiebren Boonstra is supported by a FORMAS Project Grant (No. 2009-252). Mistra supported the research for this paper through a core grant to the Stockholm Resilience Centre. The article is based on Florianne de Boer’s BSc honours thesis “Social ecological traps and agricultural involution – Comparison of their historical establishment and reinforcing mechanisms” which she completed June 2012 at University College Utrecht, the Netherlands.

References

  1. Acheson, J.M. 1984. Government regulation and exploitive capacity: The case of the New England groundfishery. Human Organization 43: 319–329.Google Scholar
  2. Acheson, J.M. 2003. Capturing the commons: Devising institutions to manage the Maine lobster fisheries. Lebanon: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  3. Acheson, J.M. 2011. Coming up empty: Management failure of the New England groundfishery. Maritime Studies 10: 57–86.Google Scholar
  4. Acheson, J.M., and R. Gardner. 2011. Modelling disaster: The failure of the management of the New England groundfish industry. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 31: 1005–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agrawal, A. 2003. Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allison, H., and R. Hobbs. 2004. Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecology and Society 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art3.
  7. Apollonio, S., and J. Dykstra. 2008. An enormously complicated intervention: Groundfish, the New England Fishery Management Council, and the world fishery crisis. Montgomery: E-book Time.Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, C.B. 2008. Poverty traps and resource dynamics in smallholder agrarian systems. In Economics of poverty, environment and natural-resource use, ed. R.B. Dellink, and A. Ruijs, 212 pp. Ithaca: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Barrett, C.B., and B.M. Swallow. 2006. Fractal poverty traps. World Development 34: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter, S., and W. Brock. 2008. Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecology and Society 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art40/.
  11. Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
  12. David, P. 2007. Path dependence—A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica 1: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Swaan, A. 1996. De mensenmaatschappij [Human Societies]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct. An introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N. 1978. What is sociology? London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  16. Elias, N. 1994 [1939]. The civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Enfors, E. 2012. Social–ecological traps and transformations in dryland agro-ecosystems: Using water system innovations to change the trajectory of development. Global Environmental Change 23: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enfors, E., and L. Gordon. 2007. Analysing resilience in dryland agro-ecosystems: A case study of the Makanya catchment in Tanzania over the past 50 years. Land Degradation and Development 18: 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enfors, E., and L. Gordon. 2008. Dealing with drought: The challenge of using water system technologies to break dryland poverty traps. Global Environmental Change 18: 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enfors, E., Gordon, L., Peterson, G., and D. Bossio. 2008. Making investments in dryland development work: Participatory scenario planning in the Makanya catchment Tanzania, Ecology and Society 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art42/.
  21. Falleti, T.G. 2006. Theory-guided process-tracing: Something old, something new. APSA-CP, Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the APSA 17: 9–14.Google Scholar
  22. Geertz, C. 1963. Agricultural involution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Geist, H.J., and E.F. Lambin. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52: 143–150.Google Scholar
  24. Gelcich, S., T.P. Hughes, P. Olsson, C. Folke, O. Defeo, M. Fernández, et al. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 16794–16799.Google Scholar
  25. George, A., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goldstone, J. 1991. Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Goldstone, J. 1998. Initial conditions, general laws, path dependence and explanation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology 104: 829–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardeman, E., and H. Jochemsen. 2012. Are there ideological aspects to the modernization of agriculture? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25: 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Healey, T., and M. Hennessey. 2000. Ludwig’s ratchet and the collapse of New England groundfish stocks. Coastal Management 28: 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hedström, P., and P. Ylikoski. 2010. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber, E., and J.D. Stevens. 2001. Development and crisis of the welfare state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Janssen, M.A., and M. Scheffer. 2004. Overexploitation of renewable resources by ancient societies and the role of sunk-cost effects. Ecology and Society 9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art6/.
  35. Johnson, C. 2004. Uncommon ground: The poverty of history in common property discourse. Development and Change 35: 407–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Layzer, J. 2006. Fish stories: Science, advocacy, and policy change in New England fishery management. Policy Studies Journal 34: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahoney, J. 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29: 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahoney, J. 2001. Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahoney, J., and D. Rueschemeyer. 2003. Historical comparative analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2007. The dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mills, C.W. 2000 [1959]. The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review 94: 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Piore, M.J., and C.F. Sabel. 1984. The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Platt, J. 1973. Social traps. American Psychologist 28: 641–651.Google Scholar
  47. Scheffer, M. 2009. Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Steneck, R.S., T.P. Hughes, J.E. Cinner, W.N. Adger, S.N. Arnold, F. Berkes, S.A. Boudreau, K. Brown, et al. 2011. Creation of a gilded trap by the high economic value of the Maine lobster fishery. Conservation Biology 25: 904–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stockholm Resilience Centre. 2011. Interaction between social and ecological feedbacks can push a system toward an undesirable state, a social–ecological trap. Retrieved 3 September, 2012, from http://www.stockholmresilience.org/news/researchinsights/insights/insight5socialecologicaltraps.5.33db2ae01355ec8e8f227d4.html.
  51. Thelen, K. 1999. Historical institutionalism and comparative politics. Annual review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thelen, K. 2003. How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, ed. J. Mahoney, and D. Rueschemeyer, 468. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Ploeg, J.D. 1991. Landbouw als mensenwerk [Agriculture as human work]. Couthino: Muiderberg.Google Scholar
  54. Van der Ploeg, J.D. 2006. Agricultural production in crisis. In Handbook of rural studies, ed. P. Cloke, T. Marsden, and P. Money, 528 pp. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  55. Von Brandt, A. 1972. Revised and enlarged fish catching methods of the world. Margate: Eyre & Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
  56. Weber, M. 1949 [1904]. The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Whitehead, A. 1967 [1925]. Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wiebren J. Boonstra
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Florianne W. de Boer
    • 4
  1. 1.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Baltic Nest InstituteStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Nordic Centre for Research on Marine Ecosystems and Resources Under Climate Change (NorMER)University of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.University College UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations