Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 344–356 | Cite as

Drivers of Forest Cover Dynamics in Smallholder Farming Systems: The Case of Northwestern Vietnam

  • Isaline Jadin
  • Veerle Vanacker
  • Huong Thi Thu Hoang
Report

Abstract

The national-scale forest recovery of Vietnam started in the early 1990s and is associated with a shift from net deforestation to net reforestation. Large disparities in forest cover dynamics are, however, observed at the local scale. This study aims to unravel the mechanisms driving forest cover change for a mountainous region located in northwest Vietnam. Statistical analyses were used to explore the association between forest cover change and household characteristics. In Sa Pa district, deforestation rates are decreasing, but forest degradation continues at similar rates. Deforestation is not necessarily associated with impoverished ethnic communities or high levels of subsistence farming, and the largest forest cover dynamics are found in villages with the best socio-economic conditions. Our empirical study does not provide strong evidence of a dominant role of agriculture in forest cover dynamics. It shows that empirical studies on local-scale forest dynamics remain important to unravel the complexity of human–environment interactions.

Keywords

Forest transition Vietnam Ethnic minorities Subsistence agriculture Poverty 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was part of the bilateral scientific project on ‘Land-use change under impact of socio-economic development and its implications on environmental services in Vietnam’ funded by the Belgian Science Policy (Grant SPP PS BL/00/V26) and the Vietnamese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). We thank Eric Lambin, Nguyen Hieu, Patrick Meyfroidt and Kim Chi Vu for their very useful suggestions.

References

  1. Angelsen, A. 1999. Agricultural expansion and deforestation: Modeling the impact of population, market forces and property rights. Journal of Development Economics 58: 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahadur, K.C. 2011. Linking physical, economic and institutional constraints of land use change and forest conservation in the hills of Nepal. Forest Policy Economics 13: 603–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier, E.B., and J.C. Burgess. 2001. The economics of tropical deforestation. Journal of Economics Surveys 15: 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beguin, H. 1979. Quantitative methods of geographic analysis. Paris: LITEC (in French).Google Scholar
  5. Castella, J.-C., T.N. Trung, and S. Boissau. 2005. Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the Northern Mountains of Vietnam: The combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system. Ecology and Society 10: 27.Google Scholar
  6. Coulibaly-Lingani, P., T. Mulualem, P. Savadogo, P.-C. Oden, and J.-M. Ouadba. 2009. Determinants of access to forest products in southern Burkina Faso. Forest Policy and Economics 11: 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawley, M.J. 2005. Statistics: An introduction using R. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delang, C.O. 2002. Deforestation in Northern Thailand: The result of Hmong Farming Practices or Thai development strategies? Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 15: 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunteman, G.H. 1989. Principal components analysis. California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), and Telapak. 2008. Borderlines: Vietnam’s booming furniture industry and timber smuggling in the Mekong region. London: EIA–Telapak, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Fox, J., D.M. Truong, A.T. Rambo, N.P. Tuyen, L.T. Cuc, and S. Leisz. 2000. Shifting cultivation: A new old paradigm for managing tropical forests. BioScience 50: 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frontier Vietnam. 1997. Biodiversity value of Hoang Lien Mountains and strategies for conservation. In Proceedings of Seminar and Workshop 7–9th, ed. R. Sobey. Frontier Vietnam Environmental Research, Report 13, Hanoi, Vietnam, 27 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Frontier Vietnam. 1999. Hoang Lien nature reserve—conservation evaluation 1997/98, ed. A. Tordoff, S. Swan, M. Grindlry, and H. Siurua. Frontier Vietnam Environmental Research, Report 17, Hanoi, Vietnam, 107 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Geist, H.J., and E.F. Lambin. 2001. What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) International Project Office, LUCC Report Series No. 4, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 136 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs, H.K., A.S. Ruesch, F. Achard, M.K. Clayton, P. Holmgren, N. Ramankutty, and J.A. Foley. 2010. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 16732–16737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glewwe, P., and H.-A. Hoang Dang. 2008. The impact of decentralized data entry on the quality of household survey data in developing countries: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Vietnam. The World Bank Economic Review 22: 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Global Witness. 1999. Made in Vietnam—Cut in Cambodia: How the garden furniture trade is destroying rainforests. Retrieved 31 May, 2012, from http://www.globalwitness.org/library/made-vietnam-cut-cambodia.
  18. Hamilton, A.C., and R. Bensted-Smith (ed.). 1989. Forest conservation in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 392 pp.Google Scholar
  19. IUCN. 2010. Buddha’s Footprint—Central Highlands of Sri Lanka World Heritage Site. Retrieved 31 May, 2012, from http://cms.dev.getunik.net/iucn/WEB001_WWW/about/work/programmes/pa/pa_paday/?5876/Buddhas-Footprint.
  20. Jarvis, A., H.I. Reuter, A. Nelson, and E. Guevara. 2008. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4. Retrieved 2 January, 2011, from http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org.
  21. Lambin, E.F., H.J. Geist, and E. Lepers. 2003. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28: 205–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mather, A.S. 1992. The forest transition. Area 24: 367–379.Google Scholar
  23. Meyfroidt, P., and E.F. Lambin. 2008a. Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts. Global Change Biology 14: 1319–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyfroidt, P., and E.F. Lambin. 2008b. The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 25: 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyfroidt, P., and E.F. Lambin. 2009. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 16139–16144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michaud, J., and S. Turner. 2000. The Sa Pa marketplace, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 41: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reyes, T., O. Luukkanen, and Q. Roberto. 2006. Small cardamom—Precious for people, harmful for mountain forests. Mountain Research and Development 26: 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richter, R. 2011. Atmospheric/Topographic Correction for Satellite ImageryATCOR-2/3 User Guide, Version 8.0. Switzerland: ReSe Applications Schläpfer.Google Scholar
  29. Saint-Macary, C., A. Keil, M. Zeller, F. Heidhues, and P.T.M. Dung. 2010. Land tilting policy and soil conservation in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam. Land Use Policy 27: 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shortle, J.S., and D.G. Abler. 1999. Agriculture and the environment. In Handbook of environmental and resource economics, ed. J.C. van den Bergh, 159–176. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Tugault-Lafleur, C. 2007. Diversifying livelihoods: Hmong use and trade of forest products in Northern Vietnam. PhD Thesis. McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  32. Tugault-Lafleur, C., and S. Turner. 2009. The price of spice: Ethnic minority livelihoods and cardamom commodity chains in upland northern Vietnam. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 30: 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). 2011. Ethnic Groups in Vietnam: An analysis of key indicators from the 2009 Viet Nam Population and Housing Census. UNFPA, Ha Noi, Vietnam, 33 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Van Lanh, L. 2004. Hoang Lien National Park. Hanoi: National Culture Publishing House.Google Scholar
  35. Vanacker, V., G. Govers, S. Barros, J. Poesen, and J. Deckers. 2003. The effect of short-term socio-economic and demographic change on landuse dynamics and its corresponding geomorphic response with relation to water erosion in a tropical mountainous catchment, Ecuador. Landscape Ecology 18: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vu, K.C., A. Van Rompaey, G. Govers, V. Vanacker, and N. Hieu. 2012. An integrated analysis of biophysical and socio-cultural controlling factors of land-use transitions in NW-Vietnam. Human Ecology (in review).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaline Jadin
    • 1
  • Veerle Vanacker
    • 1
  • Huong Thi Thu Hoang
    • 2
  1. 1.Earth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate ResearchUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Geography, Hanoi University of SciencesVietnam National University (VNU)HanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations