, Volume 41, Issue 8, pp 900–903 | Cite as

Slow Money for Soft Energy: Lessons for Energy Finance from the Slow Money Movement

  • Beaudry E. Kock


Energy infrastructure is decarbonizing, shifting from dirty coal to cleaner gas- and emissions-free renewables. This is an important and necessary change that unfortunately risks preserving many problematic technical and institutional properties of the old energy system: in particular, the large scales, high aggregation, and excessive centralization of renewable energy infrastructure and, importantly, its financing.

Large-scale renewables carry environmental, social and political risks that cannot be ignored, and more importantly they may not alone accomplish the necessary decarbonization of the power sector. We need to revive a different approach to clean energy infrastructure: a “softer” (Lovins 1978), more distributed, decentralized, local-scale strategy. To achieve this, we need a fundamentally different approach to the financing of clean energy infrastructure. I propose we learn from the “Slow Money” approach being pioneered in sustainable agriculture (Tasch 2010),...


Wind Farm Energy Investment Energy Infrastructure Technological Path Large Wind Farm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was supported by a EPSRC Supergen grant.


  1. Abbasi, T., and S. Abbasi. 2010. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 14: 919–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akorede, M., and H. Hizam. 2010. Distributed energy resources and benefits to the environment. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 14: 724–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, M., and A. McHughen. 2011. Solar power in the desert: Are the current large-scale solar developments really improving California’s environment? Gaps in desert research. Riverside, CA: UC Riverside.Google Scholar
  4. Birol, F. 2003. World energy investment outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).Google Scholar
  5. BNEF (Bloomberg New Energy Finance). 2011. Global renewable energy market outlook. New York: Bloomberg New Energy Finance.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, M. 2012. Nuclear socialism comes to the heartland of America: Early cost recovery for new nuclear reactors in Iowa and the return of electricity rate shock. South Royalton, VT: Institute for Energy and the Environment, Vermont Law School.Google Scholar
  7. Erkens, D., and M. Hung. 2012. Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance 18: 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jamasb, T., and M. Pollitt. 2010. Electricity sector liberalisation and innovation: An analysis of the UK’s patenting activities. Research Policy 40: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lovins, A.B. 1978. Soft energy technologies. Annual Review of Energy 3: 477–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McCrone, A., Usher, E., Sonntag-O’Brien, V., Moslener, U., Andreas, J. G., and C. Gruning. 2011. Global trends in renewable energy investment 2011. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Accessed June 2012
  11. Sharif, D. 2011. The return—and returns—of tax equity for US renewable projects. New York: Bloomberg New Energy Finance.Google Scholar
  12. SMA (Slow Money Alliance). 2011. Financial tools for slow money investors. Accessed 8 Dec 2011.
  13. Sonntag-O’Brien, V., and E. Usher. 2004. Mobilising finance for renewable energies: Thematic background paper. Secretariat of the International Conference for Renewable Energies, ed., International conference for renewable energies, Bonn. Accessed June 2012.
  14. Tasch, W. 2010. Inquiries into the nature of slow money: Investing as if food, farms, and fertility mattered. New York: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. WEF (World Economic Forum). 2011. Green investing 2011. New York: World Economic Forum. Accessed June 2012.
  16. Wüstenhagen, R. 2011. Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy 40: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Change InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations