Treelines Will be Understood Once the Functional Difference Between a Tree and a Shrub Is
- 575 Downloads
Trees are taller than shrubs, grasses, and herbs. What is the disadvantage of being tall so that trees are restricted to warmer regions than low stature life forms? This article offers a brief review of the current state of biological treeline theory, and then explores the significance of tallness from a carbon balance, freezing resistance, and microclimatological perspective. It will be argued that having of a woody stem is neither a burden to the carbon balance nor does it add to the risk of freezing damage. The physiological means of trees to thrive in cold climates are similar to small stature plants, but due to their size, and, thus, closer aerodynamic coupling to air circulation, trees experience critically low temperatures at lower elevation and latitude than smaller plants. Hence, trees reach a limit at treeline for physical reasons related to their stature.
KeywordsClimate Forest limit Growth Stress Temperature Timberline
With great pleasure I dedicate this article to Professor Terry Callaghan as part of the festschrift at the occasion of his retirement from directorship at the Abisko Research Station. Much of the treeline theory presented here developed during my sabbatical stays at the station. I thank Jens Paulsen for providing his unpublished statistics on global treeline climatology and Susanna Riedl for the artwork. This paper developed while funded by the European Research Council, advanced Grant 233399, TREELIM.
- Bernoulli, M., and C. Körner. 1999. Dry matter allocation in treeline trees. Phyton 39: 7–12.Google Scholar
- Björklund, L. 1999. Identifying heartwood-rich stands or stems of Pinus sylvestris by using inventory data. Silva Fennica 33: 119–129.Google Scholar
- Bosshard, H.H. 1984. Holzkunde, vol. II. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
- Callaghan, T.V., R.M.M. Crawford, M. Eronen, A. Hofgaard, S. Payette, W.G. Rees, O. Skre, B. Sveinbjörnsson, et al. 2002. The dynamics of the tundra-taiga boundary: An overview and suggested coordinated and integrated approach to research. AMBIO 12: 3–5.Google Scholar
- Gould, P.J., and C.A. Harrington. 2008. Extending sapwood—Leaf area relationships from stems to roots in Coast Douglas-fir. Annals of Forest Science. doi: 10.1051/forest:2008067.
- Grace, J. 1988. The functional significance of short stature in montane vegetation. In Plant form and vegetation structure, ed. M.J.A. Werger, P.J.M. Van der Aart, H.J. During, and J.T.A. Verhoeven, 201–209. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hoch, G., and C. Körner. 2003. The carbon charging of pines at the climatic treeline: A global comparison. Oecologia 135: 10–21.Google Scholar
- Hoch, G., and C. Körner. 2011. Global patterns of mobile carbon stores in trees at high elevation treeline. Global Ecology and Biogeography. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00731.x.
- Hoch, G., A. Richter, and C. Körner. 2003. Non-structural carbohydrates in temperate forest trees. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1067–1081.Google Scholar
- Holtmeier, F.-K. 2009. Mountain timberlines. Ecology, patchiness, and dynamics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Körner, C. 1994. Biomass fractionation in plants: A reconsideration of definitions based on plant functions. In A whole plant perspective on carbon–nitrogen interactions, ed. J. Roy, and E. Garnier, 173–185. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
- Körner, C. 1999. Alpine plants: Stressed or adapted? In Physiological plant ecology, ed. M.C. Press, J.D. Scholes, and M.G. Barker, 297–311. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Körner, C., J. Paulsen, and E.M. Spehn. 2011. A definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparison of biodiversity data. Alpine Botany 121: 73–78.Google Scholar
- Larcher, W. 1985. Winter stress in high mountains. In Establishment and tending of subalpine forest: Research and management, ed. H. Turner, and W. Tranquillini. Berichte der Eidgenössischen Anstalt für das forstliche Versuchswesen 270: 11–20.Google Scholar
- Matyssek, R. 1985. Der Kohlenstoff-, Wasser-, und Nahrstoffhaushalt der wechselgrünen und immergrünen Koniferen Lärche, Fichte, Kiefer. PhD thesis. Bayreuth, Germany: University of Bayreuth.Google Scholar
- Sakai, A., and W. Larcher. 1987. Frost survival of plants. Responses and adaptation. Ecological Studies 62. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Sakai, A., and S. Okada. 1971. Freezing resistance of conifers. Silvae Genetica 20: 91–97.Google Scholar
- Sala, A., W. Fouts, and G. Hoch. 2011. Carbon storage in trees: Does relative carbon supply decrease with tree size? In Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function (Tree Physiology 4), ed. F. C. Meinzer, B. Lachenbruch and T. E. Dawson, 287–306. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1242_11.
- Schulze, E.-D., J. Cermak, R. Matyssek, M. Penka, R. Zimmermann, F. Vasicek, W. Gries, and J. Kucera. 1985. Canopy transpiration and water fluxes in the xylem of the trunk of Larix and Picea trees—A comparison of xylem flow, porometer and cuvette measurements. Oecologia 66: 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stöcklin, J., and C. Körner. 1999. Recruitment and mortality of Pinus sylvestris near the nordic treeline: The role of climatic change and herbivory. Ecological Bulletins 47: 168–177.Google Scholar
- Sveinbjörnsson, B., A. Hofgaard, and A. Lloyd. 2002. Natural causes of the tundra-taiga boundary. AMBIO 12: 23–29.Google Scholar
- Tranquillini, W. 1979. Physiological ecology of the Alpine Timberline. Tree existence at high altitudes with special references to the European Alps. Ecological Studies 31. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Troll, C. 1973. The upper timberlines in different climatic zones. Arctic and Alpine Research 5: A3–A18.Google Scholar
- von Humboldt, A., and A. Bonpland. 1807. Ideen zu einer Geographie der Pflanzen nebst einem Naturgemälde der Tropenländer. Tübingen: F.G. Cotta; Paris: F. Schoell.Google Scholar
- Wieser, G., and M. Bahn. 2004. Seasonal and spatial variation of woody tissue respiration in a Pinus cembra tree at the alpine timberline in the central Austrian Alps. Trees - Structure and Function 18: 576–580.Google Scholar