, Volume 41, Supplement 1, pp 46–55 | Cite as

The Legitimacy of Leadership in International Climate Change Negotiations

  • Christer KarlssonEmail author
  • Mattias Hjerpe
  • Charles Parker
  • Björn-Ola Linnér


Leadership is an essential ingredient in reaching international agreements and overcoming the collective action problems associated with responding to climate change. In this study, we aim at answering two questions that are crucial for understanding the legitimacy of leadership in international climate change negotiations. Based on the responses of three consecutive surveys distributed at COPs 14–16, we seek first to chart which actors are actually recognized as leaders by climate change negotiation participants. Second, we aim to explain what motivates COP participants to support different actors as leaders. Both these questions are indeed crucial for understanding the role, importance, and legitimacy of leadership in the international climate change regime. Our results show that the leadership landscape in this issue area is fragmented, with no one clear-cut leader, and strongly suggest that it is imperative for any actor seeking recognition as climate change leader to be perceived as being devoted to promoting the common good.


Climate change Leadership Legitimacy Followers Views on leadership COP 



We gratefully acknowledge the support for this research from Mistra—the Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research, through the Climate Policy Research Program, Clipore.


  1. AFP. 2009. Obama pledges US lead on climate change. Accessed 5 Apr 2009.
  2. Bodansky, D. 1999. The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law? The American Journal of International Law 93: 596–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, A., and R.O. Keohane. 2006. The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics and International Affairs 20: 405–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carin, B., and A. Mehlenbacher. 2010. Constituting global leadership: Which countries need to be around the summit table for climate change and energy security? Global Governance 16: 21–37.Google Scholar
  5. Christoff, P. 2010. Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics 19: 637–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Council of the European Union. 2007. Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, 9 March.Google Scholar
  7. Elgström, O. 2007. The European Union as a leader in international multilateral negotiations—a problematic aspiration? International Relations 21: 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Groenleer, M.L.P., and L.G. Van Schaik. 2007. United we stand? The European Union’s international actorness in the cases of the international criminal court and the Kyoto protocol. Journal of Common Market Studies 45: 969–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta, J., and L. Ringius. 2001. The EU’s climate leadership: Reconciling ambition and reality. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, J., and N. van der Grijp. 1999. Leadership in the climate change regime: The European Union in the looking glass. International Journal of Sustainable Development 2: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta, J., and N. van der Grijp. 2000. Perceptions of the EU’s role. In Climate change and European leadership: A sustainable role for Europe?, ed. J. Gupta, and M. Grubb, 67–82. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academich Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Karlsson, C. 2001. Democracy, legitimacy and the European Union. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  13. Karlsson, C., C. Parker, M. Hjerpe, and B. Linnér. 2011. Looking for leaders: Perceptions of climate change leadership among climate change negotiation participants. Global Environmental Politics 14: 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kilian, B., and O. Elgström. 2010. Still a green leader: The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations. Cooperation and Conflict 45: 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malnes, R. 1995. “Leader” and “Entrepreneur” in international negotiations: A conceptual analysis. European Journal of International Relations 1: 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell, R.B. 2010. International politics and the environment. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Nye, J.S. 2010. The future of American power. Foreign Affairs 89: 2–12.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, C., and C. Karlsson. 2010. Climate change and the European Union’s leadership moment: An inconvenient truth? Journal of Common Market Studies 48: 923–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ringius, L. 1999. Differentiation, leaders and fairness: Negotiating climate commitments in the European community. International Negotiation 4: 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schirm, S.A. 2009. Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global governance. European Journal of International Relations 16: 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schreurs, M., and Y. Tiberghien. 2007. Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics 7: 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sjöstedt, G. 1994. Negotiating the Uruguay round of the general agreement on tariffs and trade. In International multilateral negotiation: Approaches to the management of complexity, ed. W.I. Zartman, 44–69. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Tallberg, J. 2006. Leadership and negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Underdal, A. 1994. Leadership theory: Rediscovering the arts of management. In International multilateral negotiation: Approaches to the management of complexity, ed. W.I. Zartman, 178–197. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Vogler, J. 2005. The European contribution to global environmental governance. International Affairs 81: 835–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vogler, J. 2009. Climate change and EU foreign policy: The negotiation of burden sharing. International Politics 46: 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weiler, J.H.H. 1991. The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal 100: 2405–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Young, O. 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization 45: 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christer Karlsson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mattias Hjerpe
    • 2
  • Charles Parker
    • 1
  • Björn-Ola Linnér
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic StudiesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations