How Should Support for Climate-Friendly Technologies Be Designed?
- 298 Downloads
Stabilizing global greenhouse gas concentrations at levels to avoid significant climate risks will require massive “decarbonization” of all the major economies over the next few decades, in addition to the reduced emissions from other GHGs and carbon sequestration. Achieving the necessary scale of emissions reductions will require a multifaceted policy effort to support a broad array of technological and behavioral changes. Change on this scale will require sound, well-thought-out strategies. In this article, we outline some core principles, drawn from recent social science research, for guiding the design of clean technology policies, with a focus on energy. The market should be encouraged to make good choices: pricing carbon emissions and other environmental damage, removing distorting subsidies and barriers to competition, and supporting RD&D broadly. More specific policies are required to address particular market failures and barriers. For those technologies identified as being particularly desirable, some narrower RD&D policies are available.
KeywordsClimate-friendly technologies Carbon pricing Technology policies Barriers
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Mistra Foundation’s Climate Policy Research Program (Clipore). Thanks also to two anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This article expands upon an earlier issue brief, Fischer (2009).
- ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2009. Improving energy security and reducing carbon intensity in Asia and the Pacific. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Fell, H., D. Burtraw, R. Morgenstern, K. Palmer, and L. Preonas. 2009. Soft and hard price collars in a cap-and-trade system. A comparative analysis. Discussion paper 10-27-REV. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C. 2009. The role of technology policies in climate mitigation. RFF issue brief 09–08. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C., and T. Sterner. forthcoming. Climate policy, uncertainty, and the role of technological innovation. Journal of Public Economic Theory.Google Scholar
- GCN (Global Climate Network). 2009. Breaking through on technology: Overcoming the barriers to the development and wide deployment of low-carbon technology. Global climate network discussion paper no. 2. Global climate network. http://www.globalclimatenetwork.info.
- GCN (Global Climate Network). 2010. Investing in clean energy: How can developed countries best help developing countries finance climate-friendly energy investments? Discussion paper 4. http://www.globalclimatenetwork.info/ecomm/files/Investing%20in%20Clean%20Energy%20Nov2010.pdf.
- Gerlagh, R., S. Kverndokk, and K.E. Rosendahl. 2008. Linking environmental and innovation policy. FEEM working paper no. 53. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
- IEA (International Energy Agency). 2002. Reforming energy subsidies. Paris: IEA and UNEP Division of Technology, Industry and Economics.Google Scholar
- IEA (International Energy Agency). 2006. Carrots and sticks: Taxing and subsidising energy. Economic analysis division note on energy subsidies and taxes. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
- Lindman, Å., and P. Söderholm. 2011. Wind power learning rates: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Energy Economics. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.007.
- Newell, R.G., and N.E. Wilson. 2005. Technology prizes for climate change mitigation. Discussion paper 05-33. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- OECD and IEA (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Energy Agency). 2003. Technology innovation, development and diffusion. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2003)4. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
- OECD and IEA (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Energy Agency). 2008. CO 2 capture and storage—A key abatement technology: Energy technology analysis. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
- Popp, D. 2011, Winter. International technology transfer for climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(1): 131–152.Google Scholar
- Shapira, P., and S. Rosenfeld. 1996. An overview of technology diffusion policies and programs to enhance the technological absorptive capabilities of small and medium enterprises. Background paper prepared for the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Paris. http://ciber.gatech.edu/papers/workingpaper/1997/shapira2.pdf.
- Shrivastava, M.K. 2008. Climate change and technology: Building capabilites. TERI viewpoint paper 1. New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Shrivastava, M.K. 2009. Towards a green techno-economic paradigm. Resources, Energy and Development 6: 67–80.Google Scholar
- Shrivastava, M.K., and H. Upadhyay. 2009. Climate change and technology: Perceptions from India. Discussion paper TERI/GCN-2009:1. New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sterner, T. 2012. Fuel taxes and the poor: The distributional effects of gasoline taxation and their implications for climate policy. New York and London: RFF Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A., M. Bramley, and M. Winfield. 2005. Government spending on Canada’s oil and gas industry: Undermining Canada’s Kyoto commitment. Pembina Institute Report. AB, Canada: Climate Action Network.Google Scholar